JonnyF

Back to where she started. Inane social media posts and California psycho babble delivered with that lovely vocal fry. Except now she is internationally despised and ridiculed. A chance to follow Diana with genuine humanitarian projects backed by royalty. Ruined by her ego and narcissim. What a fall from grace.

It took massive political and social pressure including Reform threatening a civil case to make this happen. Their hand was forced in the end. Months after the incident. Unlike the social media posters who were arrested charged and sentenced to multiple year jail sentences within a week (Chomper will shortly link to the court records). They tried to bury it and failed. They tried to silence the British public and failed. Shame on them.

Suspected? Until proven in a court of law this is nothing more than slurs on the dead and now their surviving families. Totally unnecessary and sure to promote more division and hatred. As if there weren't enough problems in the world today let's dig up some more from 70+ years ago. Pathetic.

Everyone knows this is what happened. The truth always comes out in the end. Well done Elon for bringing international attention to this shameful episode.

Ah, when all else fails, attack the source. Talking of history, maybe check out your beloved Guardian's links to the slave trade? https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-65113058

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5919415/One-14-rapists-spared-prison-past-decade.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2268395/Adil-Rashid-Paedophile-claimed-Muslim-upbringing-meant-didnt-know-illegal-sex-girl-13.html

I do not misrepresent factual records. I show how the sentences are totally inconsistent with the sentences handed out to other people for often more serious, violent crimes, often sexual in nature or involving children. I provide links to such more serious crimes where no jail term was imposed to highlight the 2 tier system. In response, you re-post a link back to the court records. 😆 Your argument is essentially to ignore the points being made and repeat ad nauseam "It's fair and just, because this is what happened in court and I have a link to prove it". Communist era stuff.

Politically speaking, yes. He has turned London into a crime ridden, violent cesspit, full of the type of people who will re-elect him.

He always uses the same circular argument. "The sentence is just and fair, because I have a link which shows that is the sentence that the court imposed." 😆

What on earth are you talking about? 😆 Spreading hate? 😆 I already provided the link. If you didn't want an example why did you ask for one? Spared by the judge because he went to an Islamic school. Now, continue defending the statutory rape of a 13 year old child. https://www.meforum.org/islamist-watch/muslim-abuser-who-didnt-know-that-sex-with-a-girl

She was 13. https://www.meforum.org/islamist-watch/muslim-abuser-who-didnt-know-that-sex-with-a-girl

Trying to justify and defend statutory rape is not really a good look Lou.

https://adleygray.com/what-is-statutory-rape-in-the-uk/

When you have a fictional black hole, why not use fictional investments to fill it? It's "his truth".

Firstly, he is an American citizen. Secondly he is one of the most influential men in US politics who just played a huge part in getting Trump re-elected. Thirdly, he is the owner of one of the biggest and most influential social media platforms in the world, a tech entrepeneur and the richest man in the world. So all things considered it's pretty difficult to ignore him. Who would you suggest we listen to? Kamala Harris making a speech about being unburdened by what has been, sounding like she's just polished off a bottle of Jack Daniels? 😆

Having sex with a minor is statutory rape. Please let's not go down the route of defending this. I'll need a shower...

That the best you got? 😆 You asked for an example, I provided one. There are many cases but I will not waste my day googling for you, I am not your PA. I suggest you do your own research, you might learn something and revise your opinion. Then again...

Again Chomper, deflecting and dodging the question. Why do you support self identification in some cases but refuse to in others. It's a simple question. Just answer it.

https://www.deccanherald.com/world/rapist-uk-spared-jail-being-2238153

Anything to deflect from the topic of the thread.

So presumably you refuse to refer to transwomen as "she" or use their chosen/preferred female name? If not, seems a tad hypocritical, no?

I'd imagine American Liberals will consider buying Chinese junk EV's instead. After all, they share the political philosophy of Xi's PRC far more than they do Musk's pro free speech anti censorship message. Musk won't care. He has shown time and time again that he cares mroe about free speech and liberty than he does making a few extra Billion. Besides, Trump might add huge tariffs to the imported Chinese EV's manufactured under terrible human rights conditions. Let's hope so.

Curious that you refuse to use the name he identifies by but believe men who wear dresses should be referred to as "she" and be allowed to compete in women's sports, including beating up women in a boxing ring. Double standards much?

Yes, an unusually long sentence for which he is spending his time in solitary confinement. Meanwhile convicted Paedophile Huw Edwards walks free among us and our children. 2 Tier Keir.