Jump to content

JonnyF

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    17,410
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

Everything posted by JonnyF

  1. I'm sure they'll be replaced by Rwandan refugees. We will all be culturally enriched until they breed and produce the likes of the "Welsh choirboy".
  2. Won't happen. The Thais are much smarter than Rachel from accounts.
  3. This little runt will be a marked man. I can only hope he serves a few years before someone finally gets to him. Given the history of Rwanda we should reconsider importing these people and the type of offspring they subsequently produce. Britain does not need them.
  4. Even the Libs are smart enough to see CNN's propaganda isn't worth watching.
  5. How many trans men demand to be in men's prisons? They'd find out pretty quickly if they were a "real man". This isn't about identity it's about pervs preferring to be surrounded by women. Get them out of women's jails immediately.
  6. Well done. I hope Starmer is watching. He might learn something.
  7. How were these gangsters ever allowed to run the US? Good riddance to this crime family and their pre emptive pardons.
  8. Rachel from accounts budget for recession seems to be having the desired effect. Labour damaging the country one policy at a time. Deliberately. Self loathing Luberals have no place running countries.
  9. What did she think was going to happen? They would all stay and happily hand their cash over to Rachel from accounts? Staggering incompetence.
  10. Hidden? They're everywhere. Can't miss them. The only thing hidden are the balls of those in charge.
  11. The freeloading party is over at the WHO. Well done Donald.
  12. This bloke is a bit of a legend. Good to see another international figure shaming Labour. They are a global joke.
  13. In other words, everyone agrees with his globalist agenda in Davos. Unlike Parliament, where his lies and deceit are called out (except when they are silenced to "protect the integrity of the trial").
  14. Well, DEI isn't "much like" racism. It is the very definition of racism. It prioritzes candidates for jobs/university places etc. based on race. Can't get much more racist than that. What next? The front seats on the bus? Like Liberals, the name "Progressives" and "anti-racists" chose for themselves is the exact opposite of what they are.
  15. No, like Chomps and RR said, Murdoch has a whole host of dirty secrets that Harry has allowed him to keep hidden in exchange for a few pieces of silver. Murdoch simply paid him to shut up about it. He claimed he was a dragon slayer, David vs Goliath. Instead, the simp ran away back to his wife to tell her they're OK to act like bigshot celebs for another 6 months.
  16. In order to find the cause of a problem, one must first admit the problem exists. Denial seems to be preferable to many. But yes, Blair's illegal war in the middle east did not help. We can agree on that.
  17. The massive foreign aid budget? Saying he prefers Davos to Parliament? Freezing the pensioners? Treating illegal immigrants with kid gloves? Screwing the farmers? Good enough? Or are you expecting a signed document "I, 2 Tier Keir do hereby declare that I detest Britain, especially the working class" with an official government stamp and certificate of authenticity?
  18. He wasn't smart. He lied to pretend to be the knight in shining armour and then bottled it and took the money when he had the chance to expose the people he claims to be taking on. They bought his silence. Harry's principles are for sale.
  19. They always say that at the start. Just like they said the Southport killing wasn't terror related. Despite the Al Qaeda material in his bedroom. Then he pleaded guilty to it. Most inconvenient for Labour. Some useful idiots believe/repeat it.
  20. But he said it wasn't about the money. Until it was. More lies from the perpetual victim.
  21. Not only the liar Starmer. Rayner also labelled people who correctly suggested links to terror as conspiracy theorists and spreaders of "fake news". Liars the lot of them. https://uk.news.yahoo.com/delayed-revelations-only-made-southport-070100282.html *** OVERSIZED text image removed.
  22. You can't really pick out individuals for comparison. I mean, Sadiq Khan was knighted for goodness sake.
  23. Educate Yo'self. https://www.awardsintelligence.co.uk/can-women-be-knighted-all-you-need-to-know/#:~:text=In short%2C yes%2C women can,' instead of 'Sir'.
  24. Strawman. I didn't say she should be referred to as a knight. Women who are knighted are Dames. No need for gender reassignment.
  25. Irrelevant. Women can be knighted so there would be no need for gender reassignment as suggested by WIll. Also incorrect. Dame is earned in their own right while Lady is just the result of marrying a Sir, so I think we would both agree that Dame is the greater honour since it is earnt, not a result of marrying someone who earnt it.
×
×
  • Create New...