JonnyF

Yeah you'd love that Chomps. The foam from your mouth almost flew onto my screen. Locking her up again would be another massive own goal for Labour and Starmer knows it.

So good to see her doing interviews so soon. I heard she's meeting Trump soon. She's gonna be a star. I'll certainly be supporting her every way I can. What a brave woman. Cowardly Starmer will rue the day.

Yes. Eroded thanks to zealots like you.

She pled guilty because she was held on remand awaiting trial. Could have taken 12 months. She was promised a short sentence to plead guilty. Once she did that the trial was miraculously held in a couple of days and she got a lengthy sentence. A proper soviet style stitch up. Ricky Jones on the other hand was out on bail so more than happy to wait for his trial (which was delayed multiple times) from the comfort of his echo chamber. Then not guilty. 2 tier from start to finish. Not just the verdict.

According to the 2 tier justice system. Let me guess you will refer us to the court records like a good little apologist Commie. Just saw an interview with Lucy on Dan Wooton. What a lovely lady. Shame on the left for making her a political prisoner. Lets hope she sticks around and shames the pro censorship anti free speech leftists even more. It doesn't really matter at this point. Starmer and Labour are toast.

For the white wife of a Tory councillor? No chance. Bang her up.

There were no Nazis. Only Jones incitement to violence.

We all know what happened Chomps, sorry I mean Brewster. We've moved to on discuss the double standards.

But he is white and right wing.

Already replied to it. Put your glasses on.

It's me saying you can't get away with incitement to violence by labelling them "a Nazi" first.

I'm asking for your opinion. Not the jury's. What do you think Chomps? Do you have a mind of your own?

Which Nazis? 😄 I didn't see any Nazi's present. Can you provide a link to identify the Nazi's please. Even if they were "Nazi's", whatever Jones meant by that - does that mean the incitement to violence was not a crime?

Exactly. One a white Tory. The other a Labour minority. Hence the verdicts.

There's something very wrong about Ricky Jones being found not guilty after this. Do you think that represents incitement to violence Chomps?

Send them my sympathies. But if they vote for Sadiq Khan they deserve it.

Let's face it. Labour haven't got a clue what to do. They are unfit to govern. Britain is becoming a failed state.

It needs to be applied equally. If Lucy Connolly deserved a custodial sentence, then so did Ricky Jones. In fact I would argue his offense was worse, yet his case took 12 months to come to trial, during which time he was out on bail and then found not guilty. Lucy was arrested, charged, tried and sentenced within a week. The double standard is clear for all to see. It's money in the bank for Labour's opponents. A free hit. I see you're still refusing to answer whether you think Ricky Jones was actually inciting violence. 😃 I guess that would undermine your entire argument so you're refusing to answer like the other coward.

What's strange is celebrating the incarceration of a young mother for a social media post. Still, whatever makes you feel good about yourself...

Yep. Welcome back Lucy.

I don't feel the least bit threatened. I see you, like Chomps, are avoiding my question. I will ask again. Do you think this is incitement to violence?

You know, this could be a really interesting debate if you weren't so dishonest.

You're missing the "for all I care" part. You can't only quote half the sentence 😃. What do YOU think about Ricky Jones? Do you think this is incitement? Or are you taking the cowards route as well?

Exactly. That's why he's pretending he hasn't seen the actual video. 😄 He has to lie to maintain his position.

You (deliberately) missed the point. 😃 She wasn't inciting anything. She was stating she didn't care if someone else did something. If you want incitement you'll need to refer to Ricky Jones.