Jump to content

billd766

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    32,539
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by billd766

  1. On 11/9/2024 at 2:38 PM, herfiehandbag said:

    Guns and butter eh?

     

    Now who said that?

    IIRC it was old Adolf who said something like guns before butter, but I can't find the quote on the internet.

     

    Found it. It was actually "Uncle Herman".

     

    “Guns before butter” was a slogan used by the Nazis to describe their policy of prioritizing military goods over civilian goods in preparation for war. The phrase was popularized by Hermann Göring, a Nazi leader, in a 1936 speech in Hamburg. Göring said, “guns will make us powerful; butter will only make us fat”.

    • Thumbs Up 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. 52 minutes ago, Captor said:

    It's a helicopter. Landing area not needed.

    So how big an area is needed to lift a stretchered casualty and a crewman through a treeline that maybe 30 or 40 metres high and which tree would the casualty be under?

     

    If you are going to use a helicopter for a mission like that you need at least 3 or 4 fully trained crews and at least 2 dedicated helicopters  for the task, and who are familiar with the area. The alternative is the risk of losing a helicopter and its crew and the casualty.

     

    When I worked on 22 Sqn air/sea rescue, each flight had 2 helicopters, 4 aircrews and 3 ground crews who were available 24/7/365.

    • Thanks 1
  3. 10 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

    Depends. For those who claim he is  a victim of Israeli occupation and subject to apartheid, he is a Palestinian holding an Israeli passport. If he is a citizen of Israel, he is an Israeli.

    The reality is that there was a crude attempt to label Israelis as lawless, assuming the person was  juden. The attempt fell flat when it turns out the accused was a man did not qualify. When similar people  from France, Australia etc do such things, the attempt to link  nationality to behavior is not as forceful.

     

    It would be nice if you could answer a simple yes/no question with a simple yes/no answer.

     

    But he is still an Israeli citizen, Yes or no?

     

    https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=can+palestinians+hold+a+passport&sca_esv=43a9cf8e007740e6&sxsrf=ADLYWIIrBNYSNkzkt2KjeURwJ0uEPeaAsQ%3A1731034199056&source=hp&ei=V3wtZ_o06r7Q8Q_M2LGwBQ&iflsig=AL9hbdgAAAAAZy2KZxeWjFF8WEQQVRKwtModHZzwTJ31&oq=Can+Palestinians+hold+a&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6IhdDYW4gUGFsZXN0aW5pYW5zIGhvbGQgYSoCCAAyBhAAGBYYHkjUvAFQAFjwiAFwAHgAkAEAmAHUAaABzxyqAQYwLjIyLjG4AQHIAQD4AQGYAhegAoMewgIMECMYgAQYExgnGIoFwgIEECMYJ8ICBxAAGIAEGBPCAgkQABiABBgTGArCAggQABiABBjLAZgDAJIHBjAuMjEuMqAH5IoB&sclient=gws-wiz

     

    It is considered one of the lowest ranking passports in the world. Palestinian passport holders have visa-free access to only 35 destinations including Sri Lanka, Dominica, and the Seychelles. There are 193 destinations for which a Palestinian passport holder requires to obtain a visa prior to traveling.

     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_citizenship_law#:~:text=While pre-1948 Palestinian Arab,Strip are largely considered stateless.

     

    While pre-1948 Palestinian Arab residents of the former mandate and their descendants who remained living in Israel were granted Israeli citizenship in 1980, those resident in the West Bank and Gaza Strip are largely considered stateless.

  4. 5 hours ago, hkt83100 said:

    That's fine, normally it takes me about one minute. The only problem is wasting hours on the road going on a roundtrip of about 200kms for this st**id procedure.

    My round trip is about 140km and I usually combine it with a bulk shop on the same day. I also find the Immigration staff at the Kamphaeng Phet Immigration are farang friendly and very helpful.

    • Thumbs Up 2
  5. 13 minutes ago, topt said:

    Agreed.

     

    it may not have made any difference but due to the remoteness was wondering if they could have used a helicopter. 

     

    IMHO a helicopter could have been quicker, assuming that a helicopter was available  and a landing area could be cleared in time. I suspect that you would need an area about 20 or 30 metres wider than the span of the rotor blades to be on the safe side.

     

    A Bell 212 has a rotor span of 14.63 metres so you would need to clear an area of perhaps 35 to 45 metres in diameter and that will take some time. Alternatively the helicopter could hover above the tree line and winch the casualty up, which would require less clearance but it would still take time and a well trained rescue helicopter crew.

     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Thai_Army_Aviation_Center

     

    Helicopters in the Thai military.

     

     

     

    Thailand does not seem to have a helicopter Air/Sea rescue service. The army do have helicopters, but I am not sure if they have dedicated and trained rescue crews available.

  6. 1 hour ago, mogandave said:

    I know there is no genocide going on in Gaza, Greta believes there is. Not the scarf she is wearing, and remember her “cute” octopus. 

     

    The thread is about Greta stumping for Democrats in the US. I do not think that she being an antisemite is off topic.

     

     

    No it is NOT about Greta Thunberg in Georgia, USA, but a completely different country in Europe bordered by Russia.

     

    Please try to read the topic carefully, comprehend what and where it is about and then post.

  7. 1 hour ago, mogandave said:

    Which Georgia are yiu talking about?

    Try slowly reading the OP.

     

    Here is a quote from the first line of the text.

     

    "Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg joined a political demonstration in Tbilisi, Georgia".

     

    2 hours ago, Woke to Sounds of Horking said:

    Ms Greta walked all the way to Tbilisi?

    Also in the thread.

     

    Do you think that she walked across the Atlantic?

  8. 6 hours ago, RayC said:

     

    Although we hold diametrically opposite views of the monarchy, I agree with everything you say except for the bit about tourists travelling to the UK to meet members of the Royal Family.

     

    Surely only the most ardent of (overseas) monarchists would plan a trip with the sole purpose of being part of a royal walkabout and nothing else? The number of such people must be so miniscule as to make no discernable difference to tourist numbers or the revenue generated.

    This is about all I could find about tourists from offshore.

     

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/373081/uk-royal-tourism-admission-numbers-by-establishment/

     

    Number of admissions to the Royal Estate in the United Kingdom from 2019/20 to 2023/24, by establishment, (in 1,000s).

     

    Characteristic                                         2019/20    2020/21    2021/22    2022/23    2023/24
    Windsor Castle and Frogmore House    1,592       104            426           1,092         1,402
    Buckingham Palace                                    578            -               121             304           530
    Palace of Holyrood house                         496           31              129            329           443
    The Royal Mews                                          237           5                    -               90            182
    The Queen's Gallery, London                   266            9                 49              97             -
    The Queen's Gallery, Edinburgh              116             6                 12              34             -
    Showing entries 1 to 6 (6 entries in total)

     

    1.   2020 to 2022 were the covid years and some places may have been shut down.

    2.   I have no idea of the breakdown between the number of offshore and domestic tourists.

    3.   Each of the numbers must be multiplied by 1,000 according to the link.

    4.   I have no idea of the admission charges and would have no idea of the revenue generated, nor where the revenue actually goes to.

     

     

    There is more information in the link and further breakdown of costs if you want to dig further, but at this time of night, my brain cells are giving up and my aged body is telling me that enough is enough for today.

     

    Thank you for making me do some research.

  9. 1 hour ago, RayC said:

     

    On one point, I think that you are being overly generous: Currently, I would imagine that if Republic fielded candidates in a General Election they would have no chance of winning any seats. 

     

    However, that is not the point. Imo - although it is not flawless - the Republic report does a very good job of puncturing this myth that the Royal Family is somehow a revenue generating machine, that ploughs profits back into the UK - which if the institution did not exist - would otherwise somehow be 'lost': You are, of course, welcome to accept and believe the alternative view which the likes of Brand Communications - a PR company - peddles about the monarchy.

     

    I also agree that, currently, republicans are very much in the minority in the UK. I hope that, in time, this situation will change.

    I do admit to being polite and generous in thinking that they may win one or 2 seats.

     

    Well at the age of 80, I very much doubt that it will ever change in my lifetime. Perhaps in my UK son's lifetime, though he is 46 and I doubt it, but maybe in my grandchildren's lifetime as they are 9 and 13.

     

    OTOH the republican movement may die out itself during that time.

     

    I also doubt that many overseas or even domestic tourists would travel to the UK just to see some person as a republican leader as they do no to see members of the Royal Family.

     

    Besides as most of the Sovereign Grant is spent on salaries for the staff and maintenance for the buildings, leiitle if ant monet would be saved anyway.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...