Jump to content

JAG

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    12,760
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by JAG

  1. 13 minutes ago, Pattaya46 said:

    Do not generalize such rules;

    Only a few retirees of 3 countries need to bring 65k monthly.

     

    About the news, interesting to know who will be the new Immigration Chief and what he will do with existing rules...? :ermm:

    I doubt if he will do anything. Whoever inherits the post will have no real interest in the actual function of the department, it is merely his seat at a top table.

     

    The rules and practices introduced by the departed BJ ( largely to bolster what now seems evidently a somewhat shaky route to that top table) will, like so many such rules in this country, be filed, forgotten about and ignored, and business will resume as normal.

  2. 10 minutes ago, SammyT said:

    Sigh. The point clearly went over your head. I'm implying that the same people who would rather group purchase a hooker presumably arent big spenders. But in any case you also forgot the tax on condoms and lube

    And at the risk of being accused of posting in bad taste, given their - umh, reputed propensity for "four, one after each other" they probably spend a goodly amount on those two commodities!

    • Haha 1
  3. It is relatively low key here in Chiang Rai. I returned home last week, and went into Immigration to submit a TM30. The girl at the question ticket desk took my passport, looked at the receipt from last time, ran off an updated one and I was out a couple of minutes later.

     

    Yes, they have my name in the computer as living at this address, but no one has ever checked or bothered me. It is like having your name on the electoral register in the UK, except here they don't sell the information to any other Tom, Dick or Harry who wants to know where you live.

     

    I think you just have to accept that the beaurocracy here loves their records; they are an end in themselves, they don't really use them for anything else.

     

    I don't think it is unreasonable that immigration should know where foreigners are living. The rest of the "Operation X-ray"business is just hype for one individual's profile - it hasn't really achieved anything. With the exception of him, his immediate mates, and the firms that make those giant vinyl posters, no-one else really takes any notice.

    • Like 1
  4. 6 hours ago, dick dasterdly said:

    Something missing from this report?

     

    How did three teenagers manage to hijack a tanker that had rescued them?

     

    1 hour ago, puipuitom said:

    So, three youngsters, 15, 16 and 19, got such a ship in their power.

    OR... was it an agreement? Captain told, I cannot land you in Malta / Italy so MUST bring you back !

    Then, a new idea came up: we highjack the ship, 3 take up the responsability, and.. all 105 others can get landed in EU..

     

    Get awake… what YOU would have done to escape out of missery ! ! 

     

    Many modern merchant ships, particularly in the coastal trade, have very small crews, quite possibly only two on the bridge at any one time, one in the engine room, if that is not automated. The days of having lots of burly deckhands are over. Not that hard to "hijack" the ship.

    • Like 1
  5. I made a long (18+ hours each way) journey from Chiang Rai to Mukhadan and back this week. 16 hours on a bus ( operated by a reputable outfit) and the last/first leg  of the trip - Nakon Pathon to Mukdaharn - by white van of death, there was no alternative. On both trips I made sure to sit in the middle of the vehicle, seat belts worn.

     

    The bus drivers were fine, and the vehicles clearly had speed limiters fitted; the van drivers obviously had ambitions to be cast in a remake of "Mad Max"!

     

    I choose to sit in the middle because I reckon that is the safest place to be in the event of a collision. I may he wrong - the more knowledgeable will no doubt tell me.

  6. 7 minutes ago, DrTuner said:

    I submit the following evidence to support your claim:

     

    a) Few if any at immigration can speak, much less write fluent English (just see their posters)

    b) Immigration wouldn't hire foreign trolls, they'd use their own

     

    Hence, unless it's the equivalent of tourist police, i.e. a groupie, I call troll. A good one, gets a thumbs up from me.

    If a troll, he was aware that there would be an announcement which would lead to this thread - not impossible of course.

     

    I rather suspect he/she is a native speaker posting on behalf of the Immigration Bureau, along the lines of your "Tourist Police volunteer" suggestion, although more likely a simple commercial arrangement - as a spokesman.

  7. Well now, with the sudden interest and focus on the popular vote, I suppose that the Senate will feel duty bound to follow the will of the people.

     

    Quite a clever fix really.

     

    Best let sleeping dogs (spoilt ballots) lie. If they are looked at too closely they might not support the popular vote pronouncement...

  8. 7 hours ago, freedomnow said:

    I'm sure they will nail the regional exeption way of 'no show money' method for marriage visas that is known soon as well. That consulate seems to be getting deluged by applicants of all sorts now as a side effect of Vientiane's online booking system being tied up by those consulate agents. Queues ere cleared there after the first hour before, just walk up to the window....not now by the looks of things.

    I've just this week been there. Queues much the same as the last couple of times. As far as I could tell (from observation) the vast majority of those queing were tourist visa applicants ( young backpackers - they may have been displaced by the new Vientiane appointment syste) or newly hired teachers. Vientiane never did multiple entry O visas based on marriage anyway as I recall.

  9. 7 minutes ago, sjaak327 said:

     

    If he does block this coalition using the senate, he would indeed have more than enough senators to become PM, but to what purpose, those senators might be able to help him to become a PM, they will not be able to help him pass laws in the lower house, with a 255 MP majority in the lower house, he could and probably will be rendered teethless. 

    At which point, I suspect, Article 44 will be reintroduced in some form or another.

     

    I don't think that he will be able to resist the temptation to use the senate to put himself into power. Once in power he will be a unable to resist a mechanism to allow him to have his own way. And so the clown car will continue to trundle along, until that point (near or distant) when there is a loud bang and the wheels fall off...

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...