Gaccha

Wrong. "A second UK passport is when an individual has two separate British passports simultaneously and can use both of them at that same time. This is different from dual citizenship and is also known as “concurrent passports”." Source.

If you ever want the Elite Visa (a pricey but convenient visa for long-term touristic visits) in the future then be warned, they do take past overstays into account.

This is an issue of control norms and not an issue of deprivation or cruelty or incompetence. Please see the substantive comment by Nurse Sheryl ( @Sheryl) in another recent topic on palliative care in a forum post by a member who is about to die.

Allow me to answer your question. I've read the indictment and the case against him is watertight and he is obviously going to be found guilty. But, as your own article says, he is getting the public onto his side. He's not trying to argue the law, he is arguing in the realm of politics. His aim is to gain so much political capital from appearing as a victim as to then escape the legal conviction. After all, in the last instant, will America really jail and ex-President? This is a political question.

>Walks out the building to a barren wasteland of car parks and 8-lane roads. >Screams to the concrete building 3 km away: "what massage options are there?" >Hears but his echo and the passing tumbleweed

I've experienced exactly the same scenario. The issue of whether you need to present a new TM30 when you move within the exact same apartments to a different room causes friction within the immigration police. If you telephone the immigration police they will tell you it is not a requirement, but there are officers who will say it is a requirement. This has been the case since the immigration officers presented a notice requiring the TM30 for extensions to visas in around 2020. My impression is that it has relaxed again.

This is very accurate. Until Berloscuni, politicians covered up their dirty private lives and demanded journalists not intrude into them. Berloscuni was an innovator. He grasped that the best way in hedonistic modern times is to deflect attention from policies by encouraging the media to look at his naughty private life. The media would ask him serious economic questions, and he would ask why don't they talk about his naughty swimming pool party. You can see that Boris and Trump took notice of this new style.

The Friese-Greene Club, off Sukhumvit soi 22, is famous for having a tiny cinema with around a dozen seats. Perhaps they will let you use their screen.

In general, you can renew 6 months before expiry and up to one year after, without incident. After one year, there are annoying extra documents/tests required.

They siphon it out of their own foreign aid budget. That total budget amount has consistently been below the amount that the government promised for international aid. As a First World country, the UK sends development aid to the Third World. The government has simply deducted from that budget to pay the budget of asylum seekers. There is no net increase in cost to the taxpayer. You can imagine that a lot of left-wingers are rather upset about this as they already feel the international aid amount is unimpressive. Daily Mail readers, by contrast, are simply ignorant and feel there has been some extra cost incurred by the arrival of asylum seekers.

Cost of retirees in 2022: 112.5 billion British pounds Cost of unemployment benefits for all the unemployed in the UK, not only migrants, was 1.23 billion in 2022. Cost of asylum seekers was £3.7 billion, or 29% of its aid budget, in 2022. [Source: Statista, the UK government's own statistics unit] They are the simple statistics. Crucially, you will note, as I stated before, that the entire cost of asylum seekers come out of the foreign aid budget, so there has been not a single penny extra in cost to the taxpayers because of asylum seekers. I don't know how I can make this any clearer. You will also notice that the entire cost of all unemployment benefits in the UK is a rounding error compared with the cost of retirees. The facts don't care about your feelings. If you had actually used Google as I told you to I would not now have to waste my time pointing out that I was right on every point I made. •mic drop

Is this "somethings crawling on us" in the room with you right now? Is it talking to you? Is it trying to get you to do anything? I think the psychiatrist might be an option.

But make sure you select roaming on your phone before you take off from Thailand! (It is normally disabled on your phone's menu)

The cost of refugees comes out of the funds siphoned from the foreign aid budget. It actually has incurred no cost to taxpayers, but has worsened the suffering of desperate foreigners abroad. If you mean the cost of welfare for people of working age then I you are living in fantasies concocted by The Daily Mail and The Sun newspapers. The welfare budget is a rounding error compared with the astonishing cost of the pension budget. Please use Google. It is your friend.

Not only does that smog take our breath away but it creates a beautiful and mesmerising orangey aesthetic perfect for photos to show the grandkids.

This place looks promising, the Camillian Hospital.

This is the second case in a week where a hospital has informed the police of a wanted man. I'm impressed. This suggests decent and active communication between the police and the hospitals. Everyone eventually needs to see a doctor. A person can always be identified by dental records and other such means. This means they will always eventually be caught. As close to karma as we can get.

There are seemingly three different companies operating in Thailand in the money exchange business called "super rich". And all of them have highly competitive exchange rates. The largest two are the green ones ("Super Rich Thailand") and the orange ones ("Super Rich 1965") but you might find a gold one somewhere, although I cannot confirm this is separate to the orange ones.

I am in fact doing the exact opposite; I am being very precise and on point.

It was not Thailand related. He simply expresses the general claim-- a legal claim-- that since it is his property he can do what he wants. This is an interesting assertion based on his misunderstanding of the concept of ownership of property. I have helped remedy his misunderstanding.

Okay. This is another learning opportunity for you. The English statutory law which I quote uses the example of a mortgage (it literally says in the statute that it is an example) to show that where somebody else has a proprietary interest besides the owner of the property, then criminal damage is a legal possibility. It is irrelevant to my point that it is a mortgage. It is irrelevant to my point that it is English law.

This is is a great learning opportunity for you, as you have struggled to grasp the reason why I mentioned a point of English Law. I am going to assume you raise the question in good faith. The point that I was responding to was the disbelief on the other commentator that a person could be charged with criminal damage even against their own property. Their disbelief was unrelated to Thailand itself but simply a more general disbelief. Hence if I could show that a legal system recognises the idea of criminal damage to the person's own property then I would be able to disabuse the commentator of his false understanding of legal principles. I have done that. What I have not done is what you seem to believe I have done, which is to discuss the practical application of the law in this case. But I have helped clarify the legal issues surrounding the possible practical application, which makes my comment rather useful.

"Illegally" is by definition a matter for the courts, not for the landlord. The lessee has the normal protection from eviction and the normal remedies should the landlord struggle to understand the concept of lawful eviction.

You are the lessor! You created a lease on the property. That alienates you from the property for the duration of the lease.

This is a well established point of law. As an example, here is the English Law: "Meaning of Belonging to Another An owner can damage their own property if, at the same time, it belongs to someone else – s.10(2) CDA 1971. For example, if a person sets fire to their own house, which is subject to a mortgage, they can still be charged under s.1(1) and (3) CDA 1971 as the mortgagor will have a proprietary right or interest in the property." The lock is subject to the lease. He can be charged with criminal damage.