
JimGant
-
Posts
6,619 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Posts posted by JimGant
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
42 minutes ago, Mike Lister said:And expose yourself to 10 years of back audit instead of three!
Your fearmongering is unwarranted. If you have no taxable income, but you file a nil tax return, you're now on the TRD radar as a tax resident -- at least for the tax year of filing. Otherwise, they don't know if you're a tax resident, or ever have been. And, once you're on their radar screen as a tax resident -- because you filed a nil tax return -- well, you've now entered their "people of interest" data base. No thanks.
And I doubt that they have all the Thai banks report the names of all those with "exceptionally large" remittances. But, if they do -- for that year I sent a huge bundle for a new house -- I could survive a sit down to show it came from my savings account. Doubtful they would want to audit another 9 years of my remittances, if no bank reports of exceptionally large remittances were in evidence.
Anyway, this discussion is getting stale. Do what you're comfortable with. Analyze all the probabilities, particularly that TRD even knows that you're a tax resident, and that your remittances are even assessable income. And, in particular, don't let anyone suggest you're a "bad person," and that you're heading for ten years of back audits. Geez!
-
3
-
7 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said:
They will/may advise you filing is not required, but they WILL let you file if you desire. That is no indication that filing is necessary. Just that they don't want to argue. Easier to let crazy handsome man file his paperwork if he wants.
BINGO!
-
1
-
-
11 minutes ago, Mike Lister said:
The reality is that YOU have failed repeatedly to provide this forum with any credible substantiated facts that support your emotive opinion
Sigh. I'll just let it lie that others here have substantiated that TRD is not interested in folks filing tax returns where no taxes are owed. Again, let the reader decide on, whether reality or legality, makes more sense.
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
29 minutes ago, Mike Lister said:I wonder how many times we need to go round this loop before you realise that your opinion doesn't matter when it comes to what is required under Thai tax law:
Practicality vs reality. Sometimes we just have to move around a nonsensical decree -- and do the realistic thing. That this doesn't seem to bring law enforcement down upon anyone's head -- seems to state that the Thai govt realizes the stupidity of the existing decree.
Anyway, readers are, of course, allowed to make their own decisions -- based on the merits of this forum's discussions.
-
1
-
2
-
3 hours ago, oldcpu said:
With respect, the Royal Decree does not state the foreign source income is not assessable. Instead, it states it is exempt. Is 'exempt' and 'not assessable' the same?
If it was the same, why does Thailand have a form specifically where one must list their 'tax exemptions' as part of a tax return?
I believe the exemption lines on the tax return are for items -- like per diem -- to net out gross domestic income. Foreign source income is, of practicality, treated as already netted-out income. But, yeah, you could report foreign source income gross, then line item out exempt expenses. But why? The whole game is to not even report any foreign source income on the tax return -- it is -- by Royal Decree an "exempt", ergo, "not assessable" amount of income.
-
1 hour ago, Mike Lister said:
Frankly, I think it's nonsense of a degree, the like of which we've not seen here before.
The only nonsense is Mike Lister's constant drumbeat about having to file a tax return if your assessable income exceeds 60000, 120000, or 220000 -- depending on your status. All my workers -- probably all the workers in my Moo Baan -- exceed these numbers. But few, if any, have income that exceeds the taxable threshold. So, why in the world would TRD want to see any filings from them -- or from farangs also without taxable income.
QuoteI will calculate if I owe any income taxes (including the use of the DTA). If I do not have to pay any income taxes, then I will not lodge a tax return.
Thanks, T&G -- for the most sane utterance to come out of this discussion. Mike, not sure why you're such a troublemaker over this issue.....? Thailand -- and TRD -- are not interested in folks with no taxable income. Only you are, apparently.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:
They stated that there is no 'rule or regulation' in the Tax Code in that regards, but that TRD had advised in the past that PIT people do not have to lodge a return, if they do not work for a company OR if they do not have to pay any income taxes.
AMEN!
-
23 minutes ago, oldcpu said:
My wife then noted one can apply for a tax-ID online, and we are now investigating that.
Please report "no." I've got print outs from this forum, from two different sources, who reported they were denied a TIN, because they didn't have work permits. Those are in my file, should I ever be audited about taking a tax credit against my US taxes, for the piddly amount I pay in taxes against my Bangkok Bank savings account interest.
Why? Because I'm supposedly not allowed a credit -- if I'm able to have the Thai taxes refunded. But, of course, for that refund -- I need a TIN. And, since I got advice on an upscale forum, like Asean Now -- that I can't get a TIN -- and thus can't get a refund -- well, hey Uncle Sam, there you have it.
Anyway, nitnoy credit. But minimum effort, as only an entry of the credit on one line of my US tax return (the more involved Form 1116 is only required for tax credit amounts exceeding $600 -- married, filing jointly).
So, happy not to have a TIN, nor, apparently, required to have one.
-
14 minutes ago, oldcpu said:
It reads like a lot of effort to fill in a form for no tax due ?? But maybe I am missing something??
No, you've just been brainwashed by reading too much on this forum, about having to file a tax return, because your assessable income is 60000 baht (about one/third of what my gardener is paid -- and who, of course, files no income tax form). Ludicrous. Worse that can happen is a 2000 baht fine - and the chance of that happening is zilch.
Time to grow a set -- and read the royal decree literally -- your foreign source income is NOT assessable. Yes, this was written when remitted income was the flavor of the day. But, I would bet a bundle that this will extend to worldwide income, should that come about.
Frustrating that BoI won't say: I don't know. But, have you ever gotten such an answer from a Thai? Nope. They're maddeningly adept at not losing face, by admitting they don't know. Department store clerks are the worst. But, that's part of the price we pay for living here -- and it pales in comparison to the good aspects.
-
2
-
-
2 hours ago, stat said:
Thailand stated explicitly that once income is taxed somewhere else it will not be taxed again in TH.
There were rumblings of that, early in this game, that had said something like, "If your home country has a DTA with Thailand, any you pay taxes to your home country, then Thailand will not tax same income." And a recent article in the Pattaya rag, without reference, said basically the same. Such language would make matters much easier on both you and me, as well as TRD. However, it would also cost Thailand lost tax revenue, by cutting Thailand out of the pattern, where the DTA gives it primary taxation rights.
And primary taxation rights mean Thailand keeps all the taxes, and doesn't have to absorb a credit. Only the home country absorbs a credit. Don't really believe Thailand wants to forgo a taxation windfall by saying, "pay taxes to home country, forget paying full fare taxes to Thailand, per DTA."
-
2
-
1
-
-
You can give up your Virginia residency -- for tax purposes -- but still keep your current drivers license. However, should you renew that license, that's prima facie proof that you're still a resident of Virginia -- and thus subject to Virginia income tax.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
39 minutes ago, stat said:It is even simpler then that because your UK rental income is just taxable in the UK. Apparently you did not look it up in the DBA...
Wrong. Here from the Thai-UK DTA:
QuoteIncome from immovable property may be taxed in the Contracting State in which
such property is situated.The term "may be taxed" is OECD speak for: Country A has primary taxation rights, but Country B has secondary taxation rights. If the treaty had said, "may ONLY be taxed", then Country A has exclusive taxation rights.
The US-UK DTA also has the "may be taxed" language for rental income. However, the technical explanation for this treaty goes on to explain:
QuoteThis Article does not grant an exclusive taxing right to the situs State; the situs State is
merely given the primary right to tax.So, for the UK-Thai DTA: The UK has primary taxation rights, and thus gets to keep all the taxes collected; while Thailand, with secondary rights, can also tax the rental income, but has to absorb a tax credit for the taxes paid to the UK -- meaning, of course, they may not collect anything, should the credit exceed the Thai tax amount.
-
2
-
1
-
44 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:
To be clear, you are suggesting that tax residents simply "hide" income such as US Social Security from a Thai tax return rather than documenting on the return that a DTA shields that US income from Thai taxation.
Exactly where on the return would you put this information? Per the DTA, this income does not exist for any Thai taxation purpose. Are you suggesting the TRD wants footnotes of all non assessable income not being reported?
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
23 minutes ago, Klonko said:The difficulty lies not in DTA exempt income, but in handling DTA tax credits, in particular if the tax credits only partially offset Thai tax payable.
Yes. For example, US DTA has Thailand as secondary taxation authority on my US rental income. So, Thailand has to absorb a tax credit for the US taxes paid on that rental income. If this credit exceeded what the Thai tax would be (as figured out on the back of an envelope) -- then, I could just ignore including any line item for taxable US rental income -- since, after the credit, there wouldn't be any.
The above scenario works well when netting out credits leaves a negative figure. But when a US tax credit doesn't erase all the Thai taxes due, you're kind of whistling in the wind on how to incorporate that US tax credit on your Thai tax return (since there's no provision for doing so). I guess you could jigger the rental income figure to, after taxation, reflect what it should be after absorbing the US credit. You'd be completely kosher here in paying Thailand all that's due on that rental income. But, trying to explain how you arrived at these figures would be an interesting discussion, should there be a subsequent audit.
Anyway, while the above seems somewhat mysterious, it is completely doable without hiring a 90k tax agent to navigate the mysteries of DTA tax reporting.
-
3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
29 minutes ago, Mike Lister said:At this stage in the game, nobody understands how the TRD may handle DTA clauses that are invoked by foreigners, it could even be as simple as check and pass, nobody knows. And since nobody knows, there is no basis whatsoever for the earlier post that I criticised, ergo it is fear mongering and worst case scenario, nothing more.
Hear! Hear!
For Yanks, at least, the DTA with Thailand is straightforward (as are most, since they're based on OECD or UN Model treaty language, where every treaty is a 90% replica of all the others).
What's so difficult about excluding all income from Thai taxation that the treaty says is excludable, like govt pensions? Or for including income in Thai taxation, like a private pension, where the treaty says Thailand has exclusionary taxation rights on such income? This is pretty much straightforward guidance on how income is treated by two countries involved in a treaty. What could be hard about figuring out how this income is treated on each country's tax return..? And can be done without any reference from a DTA on the actual tax return.
But stat says he's had some difficulty invoking DTA guidance. Would love to hear what those circumstances were; I don't doubt they existed, but I'm just curious as to what they were, since my US DTA seems rather straightforward.
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, NoDisplayName said:An audit by the TRD should be quite the experience. There is very little "official" an expat could provide to show home country tax returns........at least for the US.
Not so.
https://www.irs.gov/individuals/transcript-types-and-ways-to-order-them
-
4
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:I have had it confirmed by 2 tax accountant organisations that if I want to lodge a tax return using any part of a DTA for exclusions or allowances or just plain exemptions, I will need to provide detailed techncial and legal information that will be almost impossible for a layman to do in Thailand - they said I will need to use their services
I don't believe it. My US DTA gives the US exclusive taxation rights on my Air Force pension and Social Security. Thus, these figures never need to be shown on a Thai tax return, as there's no taxable income value to them (and where would you put them anyway?). Now, per DTA, Thailand has primary taxation rights on my IRA. So, I report this income, in full, on a line on the Thai tax return. Thailand gets to keep all the taxation, which is all they care about. That the DTA allows a tax credit against my US taxes -- is a no never mind for Thailand TRD -- as they're just happy to collect the full bundle -- and also that they need not report anything to the US IRS (my credit reporting on the US tax return is purely self-assessment, with no official Thai tax return data needed). Thus, this taxation proceeds as if there were no DTA, at least in the mechanics of preparing the return.
So why would you need to pay an agent 90k to file a tax return that uses DTA language to assess which income is reportable on a Thai tax return -- and which isn't? You can figure this all out yourself, assuming average intelligence, as DTA language is not that hard to decipher. Just keep a legible record of how you arrived at these figures, in case you're called in for an audit. Which, in my example above, would be 100% kosher. And probably would be for most other DTA situations.
Sounds like the tax preparation vultures are beginning to successfully scare the low hanging fruit. Beware.
-
1
-
7
-
2
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, Mike Lister said:there's a new emphasis on foreigners filing returns and declaring income.
Says who? There's probably a new desire for foreigners -- with TAXABLE income -- to file a tax return, and pay the appropriate taxes. But a desire to have someone with 120k in assessable income -- but who is 380k short of taxable income (after deductions/allowances/150k freebie) -- to have to file a nil tax return -- is NUTS! Why would TRD want to deal with all that worthless paper, and the cost of processing it....?
But, yes, if now you realize that the new remittance rules mean you owe taxes -- by golly, go get a TIN, and then file a tax return, and pay the taxes owed (and then, per DTA, deduct those taxes from your home country tax return).
But if you don't owe Thai taxes -- then don't get a TIN, don't file a nil tax return, and then relax. The worst that can happen is -- in the miniscule chance they'll call you in -- and you did, indeed, have assessable income exceeding 120k -- you'll owe a 2000 baht fine -- which is cheaper than all that effort to get a TIN and to file a tax return -- assuming your time is worth something.
So, use your common sense with this. Yes, if you owe taxes, file and pay. But if you don't -- not to worry about certain suggestions, including the big house, without vaseline.
-
3
-
1
-
15 hours ago, Mike Lister said:
The TRD Code states that a Thai tax resident must obtain a Thai TIN, within 60 days of exceeding the minimum threshold (60k, 120k or 220k) regardless of whether tax is payable or not.
And if you don't -- naughty, naughty, naughty.
-
2
-
-
6 hours ago, Mike Lister said:
Your statement that "there will and must come more clarification from the TRD" is interesting....I'm betting not, why would there be
Yeah, why, indeed, would there be any clarification needed. Thus, as there's nothing in the Thai tax code about accounting convention for remittances -- you're then free to choose whatever convention best suits your bottom line. For me, that's FIFO.
-
On 7/1/2024 at 9:41 AM, Moonlover said:
do not use the 'Funds for long term stay' option. That always introduces a delay.
I don't believe purpose of transfer would affect the other parameters. But, I'm curious as to why you think so.
-
1
-
-
On 6/26/2024 at 8:33 AM, LuckyG said:
Would a will be considered invalid if not registered?
Absolutely not.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
3 hours ago, NoDisplayName said:I would suggest the assumption will be any funds remitted will be considered assessable unless shown otherwise.
Come on, folks. Use your heads. Are they going to consider all the zillions of dollars of inbound cash flow as assessable income? Then what -- or so what -- will they then interview the owners of all those zillions as to why no Thai tax return was filed? No way. Self-assessment is the only way this thing will work. Yes, if someone has a substantially large remitted amount of money, and no tax return -- then call him in for a chat. But I suspect, to keep these random large-scale audits manageable, what constitutes a 'substantial amount of remittance' will be a rather high number.
But why worry about how they consider all remittances? Makes no difference if you're honest. Just crunch your numbers, and if you have taxable income (i.e., assessable income exceeding allowances, deductions, and the 150k freebie), file a tax return. Period.
-
4
-
3
-
1
-
1 hour ago, Mike Teavee said:
So If you switch Thailand for the UK then I am using an overseas credit card (from UK) in Thailand & authorising the overseas/UK credit card company to pay the bill for the goods or service & if I pay that using cash in the UK would be taxable remittance in Thailand IF they applied the same rules.
Interesting -- kinda turns a credit card into a debit card -- and seemingly at odds with their statement I provided. Anyway, hard for me to get my head around this UK carve-out for taxing remittances, just for folks who are "non domiciled residents." Huh?
But, re Thailand -- I guess the operative word in your statement, above, is: IF
And if they don't use the UK example in any definitive guidance -- I'd be comfortable in equating a credit card loan to a loan for a condo. Certainly, this would be a logical argument -- in the unlikely event there would ever be a discussion with TRD on my credit card charges, on which they'd have little to no data.
-
1
-
Thai gov. to tax (remitted) income from abroad for tax residents starting 2024 - Part II
in Jobs, Economy, Banking, Business, Investments
Posted
We did? Must of missed those reported examples.