nauseus

Not sure why any amount of copies should negate the validity of the original. Think Mona Lisa .. and smile.

I was commenting on your ridiculous post, not offering a response to some imaginary question.

Suggest you consider a multiple exit/re-entry permit - save a bit of cash, time and hassle.

So comical that you accuse others of making stuff up after spouting out all that nonsense.

You mean it was rigged?

Last orders please. Drink up.

Well that's what I said in the first place. I am convinced of that.

Maybe....maybe not. But nothing to do with my question, of course,

OK them too.

Maybe.

Rubbish - they have declared what they want to do in the first instance is to reverse many of Biden's XO's and excessive Democrat spending.

Why should the WSJ review and opinion be accepted by anyone? Why did they have access to the HD?

Well he'd probably win the Democrat nomination.

Got a better idea?

No worries. Bear in mind that this reg was for green bananas - you know the ones from Mars.

I didn't suggest any lies, Mac. I just found the wonderful regulation.

Here you go: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:1994R2257:20060217:EN:PDF EU QC saves the day again.

Who actually signed this deal?

It depends if any evidence might implicate his dad.

Maybe he was so out of it he forgot where he left it.

No, he didn't. The FBI did nothing. And the DOJ hasn't come up with anything. So who's the twit?

The sad result of so many people living in or near weakly constructed buildings near a known geohazard. RIP.

So that's OK then. All good.

Unless there was a Treaty change, the member states. Why have an extra EU FM then? That sounds like some David Icke type conspiracy theory. More like the EU wet dream of decades. Vetoes have been reduced in number but those that exist retain their potency by definition: A veto is a veto - very few left now and all those are probably on the endangered list. On the subject of the number of vetoes. Is it any surprise given the enlargement of the EU? Obtaining unanimity among 16 members was difficult, let alone among 27/28 member states. There is a need for compromise on occasion. How about a bit less speed and far less greed? Whether the EU should have enlarged so quickly is another matter. See above. Brexit has been an irritant that the EU did not want and has had to deal with, but it has had little, if any, effect on the governance of the EU. I'm sure.

A truly happy chappie.