nauseus

- best GDP growth (by 0.1%) is not "far". - very low unemployment (close to historic record). Historical records are meaningless as US unemployment is calculated so differently now. Many of these jobs are taken by the same person twice or more - now lower inflation rate than other advanced economies - not so - Japan is lower. - highest level of energy independence in over 70 years - not really - the US still needs to import oil by about 5 mmbd. - increase in industrial strategic sovereignty - whatever that means.

Biden and his TEAM keep their heads down due to the shameful way they are ruining their country.

Courtesy: Cherry Pickers CORP.

You are awful!

If Jack Smit has to refer back to the J6 comedy hour year, that means he has (to use a popular line).....nothing.

It's blatantly obvious to anyone who can see that Jack Smith has Jack Smit.

It was actually more because of Germany.

A varied menu but all tasting of the same sheet.

That's quite radical. I'm shocked that you could say this!

And I find it strange that, after my post, you still think that I have dismissed the negative economic consequences of Brexit. You are correct in that I think that Brexit was won because of the sovereignty issue but obviously red herrings did not ping back on my sonar. No pups were bought or sold as far as I am concerned. Being (temporarily) poorer was seen by me as part of the expected cost of leaving the EU. Brexit might have been 'done right' if the process had been managed by a strong leader instead of one who basically let the EU author that hopeless withdrawal agreement. We'll never know now. These "cumulative adverse effects" are mainly due to the rapid rise in the UK population and the associated burden on government services, especially w.r.t. health, housing, schooling and social welfare. More acute adverse effects concern the criminality (especially violent) which is an unfortunate and disturbing characteristic of certain immigrant groups. Now political and civil unrest is increasing in the UK and Europe and years of high immigration rates are the man reason for that. Migrant assimilation has not happened. You guys always worry about the growth of the economy rather than the preservation of the nation. Infinite growth in any economy is both impossible and unsustainable, in any case.

Yes and yes. Sorry about that.

Agree. The UK welfare system is too easy to hide in and is abused by many.

You really thought your post could fly? The one I saw hit a brick wall.

Running back to the economic arguments as usual. There was never any argument from me that economies would not suffer after Brexit, which was won due to other issues. The biggest problem was that the process of leaving the EU was left in the hands of the remnants of a pro remain government, which was weakly led, especially after the shock result of the referendum. Populist parties are gaining support because the silent majority of Europeans have had enough of the excessive migration numbers and their cumulative adverse effects.

Maybe because Dutch opposition to the EU is not confined to only one party?

A repeat of the repeats of your nonsense of the last 7 years. With more conservatives dominating the composition of the governments of several member states, the EU is now steadily losing sway over them, as well as any influence it may have had across the rest of the world. The EU is starting to backtrack on its "freedom" policies, as the consequences of same are now becoming clear. A name change to "Extinction Union" now seems apt.

Bad policy I agree. But what's new there?

Trump in at line 3! Nothing like staying on topic! Brilliant!

That went off like a soggy firework.

Amazing that with this, you talk of brainless posts.

Your application to change topic has been rejected. But you may reapply next year.

Or closer.

No it's not and I said safest places possible. Stop being a tit.

That was a rant but not a demonstration.