nauseus

No, I haven't seen them.

Neither diverse nor inclusive enough.

Take it easy. You are correct about who was first in with the Brexit mention. My mistake rather than an intentional lie. Apologies., I'm not desperate to avoid answering your question. I'm just bored with it after how many times now?

He did bring up Brexit so!. Go back one page. Pants on fire!

Of course the last 14 years are more relevant, in terms of numbers, but the trend was set during from 2001, under Blair & Co. The Tories must have concluded that having our noses rubbed in diversity was a good option. I expect that thinking will change after the next GE.

Sad news. RIP kids. Almost sadder replies already. The usual donks.

Your example concerns the US rather than the UK but I am both staggered and inclined to agree with one of your posts, on principle.

You forgot the 10 years before that too. Blair encouraged the onset of high immigration but how many houses did he build? There has been a lag ever since. Before immigration increased, after the creation of the EU and then Blair, council houses were offered by Thatcher to existing tenants to give them a chance to won their own home. Criminal!

Agree. Even after this news, our resident AN experts continue to demonstrate their own "disorders". Hoping that Kate's real doctors will be successful, and soon.

You forgot the 10 years before that.

But of course, and as most of you know, I'm very happy away from the EU. The serious and emerging divisions in Britain today have little to do with Brexit.

I think that was a fair post. A lot of folks might get upset but if they are honest with themselves, they will know why those comments are made.

What we can all clearly see are yet more false alarms made up by our regular clique of drama writers.

But what was said is what this topic is about. When Farage asked what should happen to Harry, if it was found that he lied about (his) drug use on his visa application, Trump said that "they" would have to take appropriate action. So by "they", Trump meant the relevant (immigration) authority. Trump was not even sure of what the "appropriate action" might be and Trump, himself, was not threatening deportation. Another headline in the clouds.

You didn't comprehend my sarcasm.

Diplomatic passport and status. You'll have to think of something else.

Wow. MAGA fascists in as soon as the second line. On form or what? Certainly not on topic.

It's not about politics, It's about one nasty and disrespectful b1tch.

Downsides? Really?

You read this flaky article, I heard what Trump said.

Yet another concocted non-story. Trump did not threaten anything.

Why, was it made in China?

Nineteen pages veering further off topic with every page. The OP and source story takes Trump out of context again. This "bloodbath" refers to the effect on the US auto industry if the large-scale import of Chinese vehicles, made in Mexico, is allowed. A poor choice of word but one previously used by others to describe industrial or economic disasters, for example. Get over it.

Did you mean Royal Assent?

Soft in the head more like.