Jump to content

nauseus

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    15,537
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by nauseus

  1. The weak source is at the foot of the the OP. Even the biased MSM can't agree. NYT says he was dozing while CNN says he was paying "close attention". Difficult to do both. Bunch of jokers. https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/15/politics/video/trump-courtroom-new-york-scannell-digvid
  2. Can we see this sleepy schedule then? I can't remember it.
  3. If you had bothered to listen to even the first coule of minutes, then you wouldn't need to guess.
  4. Not really - just least Brandon LOL.
  5. Several links within this topic already. How many from Fox? That's right. 0. I haven't denied watching Fox but at least we can see your own pet source of news now - that expalins a lot.
  6. And you give me grief about Fox News bwahaha.
  7. Oil and lawsuits all the same then - poltical. What a shame.
  8. Aha - here comes the pot to call again. We'll get back to you if we have a minute. Best to Kettle. Bless.
  9. I've linked my facts. None from Fox. Stop guessing.
  10. Double-post glitch. Or read it twice for effect!
  11. Only about 4.5% of the record and enormous drawdown under Biden has been replaced so far. The evential cost to replace the other 95% could be much more - if it happens, Biden will not be involved - he'll be alright, Jack!! Oil is nudgng $86 again today and with inflation or even a small dollar devaluation, the USA could easily lose big time. And all that with the continuing troubles in the Middle East and ukraine, which could still kick prices much higher. It's supposed to be a strategic reserve - not a political one. The US itself wasn't even being attacked. Great work Joe! https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2024/02/26/the-biden-administrations-ongoing-strategic-petroleum-reserve-gamble/?sh=2483d9412a8e
  12. Only about 4.5% of the drawdown under Biden has been replaced so far. The evential cost to replace the other 95% could be much more - if it happens, Biden will not be involved - he'll be alright, Jack!! Oil is nudgng $86 again today and with inflation or even a small dollar devaluation, the USA could easily lose big time. And all that with the continuing troubles in the Middle East and ukraine, which could still kick prices much higher. It's supposed to be a strategic reserve - not a political one. The US itself wasn't even being attacked. Great work Joe! https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2024/02/26/the-biden-administrations-ongoing-strategic-petroleum-reserve-gamble/?sh=2483d9412a8e
  13. Plus just 10% of what Joe squandered two years ago would cost about $2.3T. Oh dear. Never mind. How sad. As I said, Biden won't be involved. He's OK, Jack!
  14. Joe Scarborough is Tibetan? Could explain a lot.
  15. What do I mean? LOL! Of course I opened it. I mean that this link infers that there is a DOE purchase of 295 million barrels for June delivery but when the link is opened it reads 2.95 million. A mere splash and dash - not a refill. I'm not talking about price -yet. Better leave that just in case the SPR actually ever gets recharged properly. That won't happen for years. https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest-news/oil/021524-us-spr-refill-continues-with-doe-purchase-of-295-million-barrels-of-crude-for-june-delivery
  16. As you were kind enough to provide a link I tried a simple search. Not so simple as I had to visit several sites, most of which seem politically biased and only include stuff that fits their narratives. I know Trump had a lot of failures but there were successes too, some particularly spectacular in real estate and TV/Entertainment. But if this monster debt has been "accumulating" over so long, how come his net worth is reported as 4.8+ billion (by Forbes)??
  17. That link is rather misleading. It's actually 2.95 million, not 295 million. Oh well only another 267 million to go to put it right. Doh.
×
×
  • Create New...