nauseus

Your numbers are all wrong. Where did you find them?

And the French don't give a fig about them anyway.

I gave you plenty. You didn't read them did you?? Here's another: https://cha.house.gov/2024/3/chairman-loudermilk-publishes-never-before-released-anthony-ornato-transcribed-interview

This nonsense here is you replying to posts that I did not put up. It might appear to some that you are dishonest.

LOL

Found a new bs website?

I hope you can get your message across. I tried....but nooooo.

That trust has been evaporating for years, too.

China has been steadily reducing their holdings for years.

Not the way these links explain it and I don't see Pence's name anywhere in the timeline. The links agree with the obstruction and dithering as testified by Capitol police Chief, Steven Sund, in the lead-up to J6, after Trump first requested 10,000 extra military personnel be on duty. So somebody was lying, but it is not impulse. https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/06/jan-6-generals-lied-ex-dc-guard-official-523777 https://cha.house.gov/2024/9/transcripts-show-president-trump-s-directives-to-pentagon-leadership-to-keep-january-6-safe-were-deliberately-ignored

If these home countries will not take them then why should the UK? Especially as most of these migrants pass through several "safe" countries on the way? Now, two question marks might suggest the possibility of two questions, even to a donkey.

The links send me to the same site. So there is money, food and accommodation available, whichever way you look at it. And from news reports there may be quite a bit more than that, too. But I was more interested in your comment saying: "after they are up and running they contribute far more than UK citizens that enables them to use the NHS and they pay a higher rate of tax". Where on earth did you get this from? I need to know because it sounds like bs. Or by "up and running" do you mean leaving government paid accommodations to hide in the shady illegal economy in UK towns and cities??

You have ignored my question completely. Your par for this course, so no surprise.

Breaking news or wind??

You got a link to all that mate?

If these home countries will not take them then why should the UK? Especially as most of these migrants pass through several "safe" countries on the way?

Yes "repatriation" is very difficult. That's why some countries are now reducing immigration. Like Denmark, where things have not worked "perfectly" (check link). https://www.politico.eu/article/denmark-migration-eu-parliament-election-mette-frederiksen/

Yes. Your point is?

3 Days Before Entry ?

The headline falsely uses the word refugee, when most are not. Who has made life in their 'home countries' unlivable? Really? The UK and others have been sending aid to these countries for decades. Where does all this money go? The truth is that many of the people arriving look to be in fair health, well dressed and only here for benefits. Unsustainable in many ways.

Agree. This requirement does not consider emergency, or short notice, travel needs. Bring back TM6.

More cobblers. As usual.

No they don't. It is not their government.

The usual bunch of schiff stirrers.

tariffs is the in word