Will27

Not going to get into all of the slagging off crap. For true lovers of the game, it's been a sensational series so far. Apart from this one, the first 3 tests were crackers that could've gone either way.

These are the last 6 Ashes series. 13-0 in Australia 6-6 in England

I'm taking it one game at a time Uncle Alex I've jagged it a couple of times I think.

That's it for Round 19 Trend Setters. Rip and Chooka both picked the card. Well done boys. The Twix bars go to Rip for being closest to the margin. That's back to back wins for Rip now. Until next week.

This one dropping now. Joe attempts to balance her personal and professional life as the tip of the spear in the CIA's war on terror. She enlists Cruz, a Marine Raider, as an undercover operative in the Lioness Program.

Tremendous work again Uncle Alex

Murder in The Family Episode 2 has just dropped. https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/showbiz-tv/itv-murder-family-start-date-27307830

Sheryl, would the Melatonin you recommend be for a sleep aid, anxiety or both?

London Kills I agree with you. Think it was made for daytime viewing, hence the lack of violence and honest dialogue. A very tame series IMO. Especially compared to Luther, Happy Valley etc.

Episodes 1 and 2 are dropping now.

You could always apply for a s/c 820 partnership visa in Australia, as long as visa condition 8503 hasn't been imposed. Applying offshore is s/c 309 visa.

You can't always apply in Australia. That's the problem.

That can be a decent option, but in some cases, the tourist visa is issued with an 8503 No Further Stay condition which precludes you from applying in Australia. A lot will depend on the length of the relationship and if she has travelled to Australia before.

What do we think of the proposed wildcard being introduced? I don't like it. IMO, if you're not good enough to finish in the top half of the table, you shouldn't be playing finals. Most of the people pushing it have a vested interest as it means more games and dollars for the broadcasters and the AFL. It's a no from me.

This new one from the Beeb is getting good reviews. Follows the deaths of Peter Farquhar and Ann Moore-Martin in the village of Maids Moreton, Buckinghamshire, and the extraordinary events that unfolded in the following years.

Well Gents That's it for another round. Three picked 7 but this week's Dairy Milk goes to Rip Stanley for being closest to the margin. Until next week.

The UK one is on 1337.

The ATO is not going to provide a link saying they won't chase your debt. That would be stupid. In just about most cases, legal action won't be taken to try and collect a debt when it is uneconomical to do so. Again, spending thousands of dollars to chase a $700 would be ridiculous. This is from a well known accounting firm: ATO determines a debt is not viable to pursue The ATO can determine that a tax debt is not viable to pursue, given the costs associated with pursuing it and the prospects of recovery. If you want to keep debating this issue, start a new thread.

Again, you keep clouding the issue. I never mentioned the debt being released. I said the debt would be written off. You do know the difference between written off and release of a debt don't you?

Again, I was talking about a debt to the ATO, not Centrelink.

You just keep repeating yourself and then go off on these long winded tangents. I quoted your debt of $786, and already said it would be taken from a tax refund if one was available. If it wasn't, the ATO would send out a couple of demand notices. They aren't taking legal action over a debt that small. It would be written off. I'm not interested in your continuing hypotheticals on residents, non-resident, self funded retiree's etc.

In most cases, a Centrelink debt can be recovered by taking money out of their payments. A small debt like the one you mentioned ($786.00) if it was to the ATO would either be written off or recovered by taking money out of a potential tax refund. The ATO wouldn't waste time and resources pursuing such a small debt.

They're 2 completely different scenarios TBH. You keep bring up residents and non-residents. As it stands, it's completely irrelevant. If Centrelink are directed by the ATO to reduce pensions (which I extremely doubt will happen), the amount won't matter, it will just be done. If that is done, again highly unlikely IMO, there will not be a debt, just a reduction in pensions. I keep telling you this and you haven't grasped the concept. Residency and non-residency is an ATO issue, not a Centrelink one.

Two cracking games to start the round off. Brisbane pretty much threw that game away. Only really needed one more goal after Daniher's put them 23 points up. They then decided to play safe and just kept going up the line. Then it looked as if they panicked and just tried to save it.

This is the part I quoted.