ballpoint

A genie granted me one wish, so I said "I just want to be happy." Now I'm living in a cottage with 6 dwarves and working in a mine.

I always thought there was something weird about people who wear overpriced plastic sandals...

I agree with your sentiment, but the blood of tyrants has never splashed the streets of Thailand. They either carry on as they were, or leave the country to return later. Indeed, one of Thailand's darkest moments, in October 1976, was due to a tyrant (Thanom Kittikachorn, who was Prime Minister during the 1973 uprising), leaving the country for a while before coming back to an open armed welcome by certain figures. The fact that we can't say more than that here shows just how ineffective the protests, and subsequent beatings and massacre, were. Ironically, given this thread, that same tyrant later became Prime Minister again, and was heavily supported by the US, as a stalwart in their fight against communism. (As he was during his first term). Then roll forward to 1992 and Black May. 200,000 protestors in Bangkok, resulting in around 100 recognised deaths, 700 badly injured and 175 missing. And, despite numerous governments since, these missing have never been accounted for or their remains found. Tyrant deaths? Zero. Then, four years afterwards, many of the elite side were back in government, and now the corruption continues, the elite continue doing what they like, and votes still count for nothing - unless they're for the "right" people. It's all too easy for some to come on here (not you), claiming Thais are cowards, their mentality isn't up to it, they don't know their history (quite ironic, since those who write such comments sure don't know Thai history), blah blah blah, but I'd suggest that Thais are all too aware of their history, and have seen multiple protests over the years viciously crushed, with no gains what so ever. It's one thing to die for your cause; it's quite another to step into the path of a machine gun and be killed, only for the shooter, and his entire chain of command - up to the very top, to carry on as before. Like a ten ton truck squashing a frog on the road and careering on with no change in speed or direction. What does that frog in particular, and the frog population in general, gain from it? Until the Thai people are given hope that their protests, and perhaps, ultimate sacrifice, will actually cause change, then nothing will change.

Some nice dashcam footage at the start. This one includes the bleeped out "commentary" of the car driver...

Improvise, adapt, and overcome.

I'm in the same position. There is no CGT in Australia for non-residents when the gain is made on Non-Taxable Australian property, and Singapore, where there is no CGT at all. The income has been reported in the country it was made, but is legally tax free there, so definitely not tax evasion. In the past this was easy to remit to Thailand without having to pay any tax on it here, by using the "earned in previous year(s)" method. Unless / until Thailand starts taxing all overseas income, regardless of whether it's remitted here or not, the capital gains you make in such countries are not taxable here, as long as they're not remitted. Now, at this point I was going to agree with you on using the gain from one asset to buy another, and then sell that at break even, or a small loss before remitting it to Thailand, but while thinking about how to word it I changed my mind, as I suspect the TRD will only be interested in the sale of the second asset as a whole. Unless you realised the initial gain, and bought the second asset prior to Jan 1st this year, I think it will all be assessable. I hope I'm wrong, but everything I've read in the tax code, and talking to TRD people, I fear that I'm right. Using a similar example, If I made a capital gain of $10,000 this year and put it in a bank, then remit the full amount next year, I'd need to report that as assessable income. Even if bank fees caused that amount to drop slightly, so I'd made no gain on that money, it would still be assessable. Buying shares may be treated differently, but I suspect it will be the same. The TRD will see that you sold £10,000 of shares, that you didn't hold prior to Jan 1st this year (if that even matters, but that's a different can of worms), and will want to collect the tax on it. In any case, this is definitely a question for a reputable tax advisor. (However, I'm holding off asking any such questions until the tax advisors themselves know what is going on. Hopefully later this year, though given that this year's tax situation regarding remitted funds is no different from previous ones, in that income earned prior to this year is still non-assessable, it may not be till late 2025 that things actually become clear).

Discussion on whether deposits into your Thai bank account(s) were from a local (or seemingly so, via Wise) source, or a foreign remit are pointless. If you are audited they will want to know the source of every deposit made into your account(s). Unless it was a local one from (for example) sale of a car, or other CGT free asset, it will still be treated as taxable income. And if you do claim it was from a CGT free asset sale, they will want to see documentation proving this. When it comes to tax law, you are guilty until proved innocent, and the onus of proof is with you, not them.