puchooay

An off topic observable fact. As you yourself pointed out. Also one that last took place nearly 2 centuries ago. Sounds like knocking.

Like I said. Those with the ability to digest and consider the meanings of what they have read and learnt,l don't need to be given links to nurse them to the evidence.

Plenty of evidence if you care to view with an open mind, witness what is going on around you and acknowledge not everything in life needs a link to be proven. Try walking the road of life more towards the middle. It is far more enlightening

The salary difference between private and public is not as clear cut you make out. I've known public school salaries easily above the 40k salary you quote.

You are right. Those kind of posters should shut up and leave.

You are funny. The obvious thing is you can't see what's in front of you.

Common sense prevails. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-64759118

Yep. Just about care. That's why the case was filed on behalf of the unborn child using the Florida law on life at conception. If it were solely about care, why was the filing not in the name of the incarcerated woman? It is her that receives the care, or not, after all. It's all obvious really.

Not incorrect at all. I was pointing you in the direction if a substantiated answer, as that seems to be what people need on here.

More likely the insurance doesn't cover unlicensed motorcycle riders. There have been a few of these stories recently. When will people learn?

Get yourself a dictionary. Look up "woke" and then look up "community". That should give you the answer. I too think the changes are nonsense, I hope it back fires on them. Next thing we know Oliver Twist will be "financially challenged". Fagin was ugly. 555

Whilst using the law that the foetus is a person in it's own right. The claim was filed on behalf of, in the eyes of law in Florida, the child. You clearly disagree with this filing as you refer to "foetus" and not "child" or "baby". Thus, basically and fundamentally, agreeing with my post.

What part of "can't" don't you understand?

I have never said she is having it both way.

You obviously missed "now in prison awaiting trial, she claims her baby is being unlawfully detained".

No. She's trying to get released on the grounds her "baby" is being held for no reason. From the OP, that'd made quite obvious.

Exactly my point. The prosecution need to point out it goes both ways.

Not according to the accused. My point was, if it is being held against it's will. It has to be considered when prosecuting the accused. Can't gave it both ways.

Is there a law in Florida against taking a minor with you while you commit murder? If so, that needs to be added to the charge sheet.

Quite correct. Why? Becase the app is a blocker at connection level. It covers the device, not platforms. Nothing to do with using products from the companies you quoted. Once fully developed I can see the big phone manufacturers buying the technology and selling their devices with it pre loaded. Good luck to SafetoNet. A company with little over £1m paid up capital. I hope they make millions out of this..

The volunteers are not setting up the app. The volunteers will download the app and test it in real time. It's called System Testing. In integral part in software development.

Just completed my wife's FLR application. She was given a partial waiver on IHS payment. Didn't apply for one. Just appeared. Anyone else had one?

I asked you a question. As usual, you sidestepped that question as you knew the answers would contradict what you wrote. Never mind. Ho hum.????????

Thanks for confirming you agree with me. Your lack of desire to explain speaks volumes. Thanks again.

OK. If that is true, please explain why the words edited were chosen. Two examples to start with; "fat" and "ugly". It is quite clear they have been edited as to not offend certain groups. What groups of people tend to get most offended? The woke community. Simple. My children are too old now for such stories. Should I, in the future, have grandchildren I will be reading them the original versions. I will use them as teaching aids with regards to certain words and how they should and shouldn't be used. Calling someone "fat" or "ugly" in anger or in order to get a reaction is totally different to an author using they to correctly describe someone in a book and should be kept that way.