josephbloggs

Not true if you live on the Sukhumvit line - it is one change at Phaya Thai from ARL to BTS and it is a short connection. Also need to consider the wait time for a taxi from Suvarnabhumi which can be bad.

Oh dear.

Brilliant idea - give him five minutes to prepare for the attack so undoubtedly more people will be killed or injured.. Genius.

How long were you delayed at immigration?

Nonsense.

I don't agree with that. Thai police are incredibly patient and restrained - especially compared to those in the West. It is pretty rare for them to fire shots.

Don't worry, someone will be a long shortly to say that: It's not a patch on Italian food / Mexican / French etc. It's not even a Thai dish. MSG Dirty oil etc etc

I say that is nonsense. All the shops have the product on display in jars and you are free to look at it, smell it, ask questions about it. Then they weigh it out in front of you and off you go. Maybe if some dodgy bloke is selling pre-rolled somewhere but that is illegal anyway.

Cannabis makes your eyes pop out of your head? What planet are you from?

No doubt you'll be doing the horourable thing and retracting your accusation?

Tiring. I'll try one more time. They were banned before, right? As they were banned before if they are banned for a second time that would would mean they are being banned again, right? Therefore I said you can ask for them to be banned again if you like. No where did I state, accuse, imply, or suggest that you were responsible for the first banning - you're the only one who is reading that into things. Got it now? Again such a teeny tiny thing to get your knickers in a twist about.

Calm yourself down, I didn't accuse you of anything. Read it again slowly and take your time. I said if they hurt you you can ask for them to be banned again if you want. Such a trivial thing to lose yourself over - "honourable thing", "false allegations", you are not at the Old Bailey you know.

You could always complain and ask them to ban emojis again if it hurts you. I am amazed that there are adults that actually care about that - personally I don't even look at what emojis have been clicked on my posts; who cares? (It wasn't me by the way, I don't see the point in them but can't understand why people get so upset over them)

Apart from the two he took into his home, obviously.

Do you understand what an analogy is? For clarity I am NOT the CEO of a major corporation - did you really need that explaining? It was an analogy: "a comparison between things that have similar features, often used to help explain a principle or idea." Now that you know I was not referring to my employment (which you state you would not be interested in) and that the story was used as a device to highlight the flaw in your argument by way of a comparison, would you care to respond? Or will you just deflect for a third time? (I think I know the answer)

How is that off topic? It is an analogy to describe the massive flaw in your argument. And you obviously have no comeback hence the deflection.

Gosh this is tiring when you keep throwing in childish comments like "your lot", "your band of brothers" etc. Try using adult language, it makes things much more engaging. I'll give you an analogy. I am the CEO of a large corporation and I have been CEO for more than 12 years. The company is failing badly, we are losing market share, staff are quitting in droves, revenue is falling off a cliff and our products are not being bought. Is that my fault as the CEO, or is it the fault of the previous CEO from over a decade ago? In your eyes it would be the previous CEO, right? Even if the previous one was terrible I have had 12 years to fix things yet they just keep getting worse. (The staff of my company also voted to restrict our market size, voted to add cost, red tape and bureaucracy to our exports, and expelled a lot of our foreign workforce, but that's another analogy for another day)

Righty ho.

That looks really cool. The Chinese are really owning the EV market.

Whoooooooosh.

"Boat people", nice to see you sucking up the dehumanising language of the government and Farage - they are not asylum seekers, refugees, just "boat people". Did you miss my other questions?

Hilarious.

Yawn, you keep banging on about Albania, have you not got another record you can play? So all the asylum seekers are Albanian and French then? Can we just please discuss asylum policy as that is a blanket policy - it is only you who keeps bringing Albanians into it. Is our asylum policy compassionate, just and fair? Have the Tories done a good job of managing it? Has Brexit had an impact? Have the boat crossings increased massively post Brexit and have they increased massively under the Tory government? Leave your pet Albanians out of it an answer those questions.

I have no idea who is in the boats, do you? (Not Daily Mail or Farage evidence, actual evidence).

So people in war torn countries can just pop into their local British Embassy, pay the fee, apply for the visa and Bob's your Uncle? You really think it works like that? You are deluded.