Jump to content

mcfish

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    3,544
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mcfish

  1. Seems obvious to me,

     

    Age requirement: Foreigner aged 50 or more who applies for Non-immigrant catergory O-A (Long Stay) from Thai Consulates in their countries or foreigner who travels to Thailand with other types of visa and wishes to change to a Long Stay Visa. Holder of this type of visa will be permitted to stay in Thailand for 5 years with multiple entry and granted for another 5-year extension with multiple entry.

     

    So, do you WISH to use the new Long Stay Visa?

     

    Thailand Immigation:   We provide, you decide......................

     

     

    Boom!

  2. If you have family, the Thai immigration CAN NOT refuse you entry into Thailand unless you have committed a criminal offence. 

    It's not the entry that I would be worry about its the forced exit. There are countless guys that cannot afford the the 400k visa so it's looking very bleak but I have faith the op article has it all wrong. Remember the article that came out saying all farang need a work permit to rent out their condos? The mayor of phuket had to release a statement saying it wasn't true because of the panic.

    Im expecting a similar response here

    Sent from my SC-01D using Tapatalk

  3. I don't believe that. I think the majority of over 50's would do voluntary deportations if they could no longer qualify. Not happily, of course. 

    It was an over exaggeration, what I really should have said Is married guys. If I had a family I would risk it without a doubt unless I could get them out to my home country.

    Sent from my SC-01D using Tapatalk

  4.  

    The real estate bubble of Japan in 1990 did not burst either. It just gradually deflated for over two decades...creating a lost generation.

    Exactly why punters should stay away from places like Japan, Hong Kong, Australia and look for emerging markets. However emerging markets always create fear, it takes balls but the fact Thailand was completely unaffected buy the 2008 global sub prime crash is a hidden sign

    I bought property's here in 2006 after selling up back home and in 2008 thought woops did I it stuff up.. No way! Back in the USA properties dropped by 50 to 80% whilst Thailand was completely unaffected.

    Thank God I switched. But if you look at the TV posts in 2007 you will find overwhelming mantras, don't buy in Thailand what you can't walk away from. And these guys did there balls.. Haha.. Idiot bar stool boys following silly advise from a forum like TV? They deserve it!

    Sent from my SC-01D using Tapatalk

  5. Has anyone come across a figure of how many of us troublesome retirement extension expats there are?

    There was an article recently published that said there were 40k expats in Chiang mai. I don't know if that was white guys or the whole world.

    Chiang mai is the most popular place for retirement so you will need to guesstimate the rest of Thailand from that

    Sent from my SC-01D using Tapatalk

  6. 2 hours ago, Spellforce said:

    "VISA ON ARRIVAL reduced to 1000 Bahts to attract more tourists"

    Because of the weak GBP & Ruble, if something has to done it would be to reduce and not to raise the requirements "to keep the foreign residents". That would make sens.

     

    Many residents have assets in Thailand (houses & condos), it could be catastrophic to the thai real market to loose that population !

     

    Absolutely real estate would be devastated however the big wig policy makers would be dragged into the vortex and no way they are going to allow their own assets to be trashed 

  7. 6 minutes ago, Katipo said:

    I would say most!  foreigners who live in the sticks don't really do it out of choice, but ratThailand because their wife/gf wants to be near her family, and you need her if you want to have a place to call your 'own'.

     

    Yep you nailed it. Being a country boy back home surrounded by your own people's is light years away from being one in thaI land where you may as well well be on Mars

  8.  
    It's a beautifull island though, but you're right the resorts are lowclass. Also the restaurants are and they can't spea inlit.
     
    I rented a motocy but the brakes barely worked, mai pen lai, who needs brakes going downhill with a passenger on the back...sabaai sabaai.
     
    But if i'm on a beautifull beach i don't like to hear jetski's at all, and also there was some walkingbridge to the beach which was totally broken and very dangerous...mai ben lai...
     
    The beachbed renters can even speak russian! That's important for them.

    I love koh larn it's gorgeous and don't like to mention it to much because most tourist don't know about it but thankfully barbie doll topples Russians do!
    But had a bad experience last time when a friend caught the wrong ferry and ended up on the day trip beach where there were 10000 Chinese! I couldn't believe it and the insane noise from all those boats and jet skis was literally unbearable! It has to stop

    Sent from my SC-01D using Tapatalk

  9.  
    I am not saying the report is false.
     
    What I am saying is that often these “analysts” are describing current trends rather than predicting the future, and if you invest based on current trends, you’re often too late. An example of this was Singapore which I mentioned earlier.
     
    Another example of analysts simply reacting to the market can be seen if you plot a stock price and its target price (from analysts), when the stock goes up, the analysts will adjust their target sometime after, and the same when it goes down. Logically the analysts would only adjust their targets whenever the company report last quarter earnings (or in some rare circumstances, when numbers are released that affect the market of the company), but this is not at all how it seems to work. I have seen “irrational” stock movements, i.e. not based on any actual numbers, and lo and behold, shortly after the analysts will follow along…

    I agree with you to a degree but even current trends does not mean your to late, nobody will know when the current trend will stop. As your well aware shrewd investors wait for a strong up trend before plonking down the cash in the stock market which pushes the uptrend to many multiples.

    This is what happened in India, a place at the time was just to weird to invest in but everyone jumped on board once a trend was established. Bangkok is just a city with a very good trend happening right now, in 5 years it may be unreachable to the average Joe

    Sent from my SC-01D using Tapatalk

  10.  

     

    Now if there ever would be proof of a Bloomberg fanboy, it was just given.

     

    They have created incredible wealth for subscribers over the years.

     

    How do you create wealth by reporting the actuality, which can be read on hundreds of other sources?

    Hey you don't have to follow them but what I'm seeing here are some upset TV armchair experts that can't handle a respectable company like Bloomberg publishing well researched info on Bangkok rising quickly up the investment ladder

    We even have one fellow trogers preferred to go with an article written by an anonymous nobody about pattaya! How misinformed can you be possible get LOL

    I Will stick with Bloomberg they have helped me immensely with the stock market, not going to switch to TV barstool team any time soon..

    Sent from my SC-01D using Tapatalk

  11.  
    Of course they have, they want you to think that a Bloomberg subscription will give you key insight to use for successful investing, and thus they can sometimes be a tad too optimistic about “new investment opportunities in X”.
     
    Though this report is not made by Bloomberg, it is by PwC (but maybe commissioned by Bloomberg?).
     
    And my comments are not about Thai real estate, it’s just about not putting too much faith in this list, as I pointed out in a previous comment, past performance of the list does not seem all that good.
     
    Also, being number 8 on a list of 22 places, and getting that number 8 spot from a survey, does not say anything about whether or not you should buy a condo in Thailand and expect it to appreciate.
     
    I started investing a decade ago, initially I followed a lot of analysts, it didn’t take me long to realize that they are not much different than any other journalist, and doing my own research was superior to the “free advice” I could get by following the various analysts.
     
    You seem to have very high regard for “the experts at Bloomberg”, are you an investor? Have you invested based on what you read in Bloomberg with a successful outcome (and by successful I mean better than just investing in an index fund)?
     
    Disclaimer: I have never bought any of the special reports, I would expect these are of a much higher quality than what you can read online (for free), and I would also expect them to be much more about data/numbers than specific advice about what, where, and when to invest.

    Bloomberg are great for identifying emerging markets Wether it's a property or stock market but a lot of is not for the faint hearted. They have created incredible wealth for subscribers over the years. They have no reason to put out a false report on Bangkok but as usual and Like what happened in India most wait until the chart goes vertically before jumping on-board


    Sent from my SC-01D using Tapatalk

  12. Thing is, when you make the sensational OP based on little information you will miss some important informations.
     
    I guess, after the visa is granted in his own country (of the selected nationalities)
    the applicant will have to be given some special government or monitored account. 
     
    Then then must deposit the funds into this account before they enter.
    I guess in this way they will be able to monitor how the money is managed according to their requirements of staying in account for 1 year.
     
    What i find interesting is not the visa or requirements, but they will ( yes THEY ) will prevent you using your own money, and force you to spend half of it in Thailand.
     
    (What if on you need the 3mill in the first year for hospital bill)??
     
    Which also means:
    -if you dont spend half of the money Thailand it will be seized due to non compliance
    OR 
    The government instruct the banks that under no cicumstance can a farang withdraw 1.5 million to his own country account.
     
    As always the proof of the eating is in the fine print.
    They say now, but then later it is impossible to do.
     
    Typical Thai sensational over-reporting and way to early.
     
    Just like police in a major crime..report many details they shouldnt and state they have 80% solved the case.lol
     
     
     

    Now that makes sense! The OP makes very little sense and would in fact destroy hundreds of thousands of families as farang is forced back home

    Sent from my SC-01D using Tapatalk

  13.  
    If a real estate salesman cannot paint a rosy picture for you, imagine the reality...
     
    Bangkok is not that different, just a little behind in lag time. I keep looking at that two projects at the intersection of Sukhumvit with Rama 4, and have not seen much movement in sales when take-up rate is below 50% and construction completion has been 1-3 years ago.

    If I were somebody wanting to accumulate cheap property that's the article I would write, but come on man your all over the place, trying to substitute pattaya for Bangkok with a dodgy article written by a complete nobody

    This is typical of Thai visa, misinformation.

    Try and stay on topic, it's all about Bangkok. Bloomberg got that right at least lol

    Sent from my SC-01D using Tapatalk

×
×
  • Create New...