hellyes2oo2

jtj, on this and every other thread relating to this crime you have repeatedly derided all us so called conspiracy theorists as spouting nonsense. But when asked questions by many people you continually refuse to answer them, just repeating your usual diatribe against anyone who doesn't agree with your views. So here and now I challenge you to answer a few of the anomalies in the police statements, you have a large audience just hanging on your every word, so here is your chance to convince all of the sceptics, just answer the following questions.

1 these two burmese guys were among the first 300 who had their DNA tested, and the police made a statement that no matches were found among those 300, so how did they suddenly get a match when they tested them a second time?

2 the police said that the phone david bought in thailand was found on the beach, bloodstained and with a blond hair stuck to, they also said that the phone that he brought from england that was blocked in thailand was found in his luggage, so how did that phone get found behind the burmese guys room? or are we now to believe he had three phones.

3 The police have not said if this other phone had been tested for fingerprints or DNA, nor have they said if it contained the burmese guys fingerprints, why not?.

4 The police stated on friday, that the burmese guys had confessed to the killings because " We saw them having SEX on the beach and we were jealous" But on saturday the police changed that statement to say " We saw them KISSING on the beach and we got jealous, so which was it.

5 None of Davids DNA was found on Hannahs body or vica verca, which proves they were not having sex or kissing, so why would the police accept a confession that obviously was not true. And by the way the police did state that david and hannah did not have sex.

6 The mafia chief offered 1 million baht reward to the police ( not the public) if they could prove that his son was involved in the killings. Yet his son says he was in Bangkok at the time of the killings, are you trying to tell me that he would not know if his son was in Bangkok or on the Island, and if he did know he was in Bangkok why offer the reward.

7 Why was the cctv evidence tampered with to remove 2 minutes of the tape?.

8 If the mafia chief was so convinced his familly were not involved why not just give DNA samples and have done with it.

I will leave it at that for now, because i know you made need a some time to converse with the RTP, so that you can come up with some pretty amazing answers. My bet is that you won't answer any questions, and you may even ask your buddies to come and arrest me for doubting their unblemished record of being honest over the years. If you want me to make it easy for them to find me just PM me, I am in Thailand.

johnthailandjohn, i ask you again, when his father offered one million baht, not to the public, but to the thai police to prove his sons guilt or innocence, how come he didn't know that his son was at university in bangkok. i always knew when my son was some 600 kilometres away from home. And please don't give me any crap about maybe he didn't know where he was, because i'm pretty sure as soon as the allegations were made against his son, the first thing he would have done is called him. And if you are certain we should believe all the people who "saw him at university" then why shouldn't we believe the people who said he left the island on the first boat the morning after the murders. And you still haven't provided any link to the so called cctv evidence showing him at university, could this be because it has not been made public, and you are only basing your comments on what you have read

johnthailandjohn.It seems to me that you have selective memory. It was stated that these 3 guys were among the 300 who had their dna tested within the first 2 days of the murders, and the police subsequently stated that all 300 were not a match to the dna extracted fron david and hannah.

Also please compare these two staements from the chief of police. On friday he stated that the burmese guy had confessed to killing them both because he felt jealous when he saw them having SEX on the beach. Then on saturday he said i am satisfied we have got the killers, because one of them confessed he was jealous when he saw them KISSING on the beach.

But what makes this even more puzzling is that the police stated a few days after the murders that none of davids dna was found on hannah, so how could this burmese guy be telling the truth. And can you tell us all why the kamnan and all his family were allowed to refuse dna tests when everyone else was required to give one. The kamnan also offered the thai police a million baht if they could prove that his son was involved in the murders ( or maybe i should have said not involved) this offer was made just about three days after the murders. The puzzling thing here is that the son said he was taking an exam in bangkok at the time of the murders. Now surely the kamnan knew that his son was at university in bangkok, so why didn't he state that at the time he made his offer.

one last point if i am not mistaken none of the so called cctv footage of the son being on campus has been made public so how do we know if it exists. as you clearly regard yourself as a guardian of the RTP please feel free to answer these questions, and while you are at it and you seem to be so well informed please let us know if any internal discipline has been meted out to any police officer that has been found to be lying after they tried to coerrce a taxi driver into making a false statement. Over to you.

The one thing that really puzzles me about this is, when this mon guy offered a million baht to the police if they could prove that his son was guilty, or should i say innocent., why didn't he say at the time that his son was in Bangkok when the murders took place. Nothing was mentioned of this until about 2 or 3 days later. And the police have not made public the so called cctv evidence showing his son in Bangkok. And didn't i read somewhere that the son was known to have left the island on the first boat the morning after the murders.

Niwpix, Since the coup, almost every social media site in thailand is being monitored. And as thai visa is one of the most used sites, I think we can assume that this site is being monitored. So we are not talking about a small not very well known site.

I don't know how long you have lived in Thailand, but you have to understand thai culture. Just to give you an idea about the culture, a few days ago i wanted to read a sports report on the daily mail website, when I tried to log on, to my astonishment I found the website was blocked by the thai goverment. The Daily Mail is an english newspaper, what reason can the thai goverment have for blocking a newspaper, as far as I know they haven't insulted the thai goverment.

The reason that I have been trying to warn "LostinIsaan" to tone down his comments is that what he did was point out specifically people that were involved in the sale of drugs, i.e. The Chief of Police in Uthom Phon Pisai, and also he accused most of the other police of selling drugs to young people either for money or sex. Now I honestly don't care if he gets arrested or not. But as you point out would he be arrested and thrown into a overcrowded thai prison, the last time I looked the thai police didn't give a shit if a prison was full. But your second point was, would he be subjected to some unlawful retribution, and i would say almost certainly 100% he would be.

Thais do not like to lose face,and that is just the ordinary man in the street. So can you imagine the fury of the Chief of Police if he is accused by a farang of being complicit in the selling to drugs to kids. So yes my answer to you is, we must all beware of critiscing anyone that has any power. Remember we are not in Bangkok, and any farang disappearing here in Isaan, will not be investigated by the police the same as it would be in Bangkok, espicially if the police made him disappeare.

Finally, my last point is, you ask would anyone really take the time to try and trace a IP adress, well in this day and age of computer geeks it probably takes about 2 minutes to trace.