radiochaser

CNN? CNN? You want to use CNN as your factual evidence? Now I understand why you post the comments you post!

Give up what? Your claiming that I can't read and understand what I read? Perhaps you did not write exactly what you meant. You knew what you meant in your mind, but it didn't come out that way on screen. Good for you on not blocking anyone. I haven't blocked anyone in these forums either. The only people I have ever blocked were scammers on facebook and scammers that contact me on my cell phone.

Hey, stop it, or he will tell you, "Don't bother me anymore" and that will fix you good!

I am going to quote you, in response to what I wrote ... "You didn't understand or chose not to." Don't bother you anymore? I'm responding to you? Will you block me?

So, does that mean when a leftist claims someone is giving out, misinformation, they are claiming that the the someone is lying? So, your claim that "Trump would prohibit any speech he disagrees with." How is that not, "misinformation"? Do you have any factual evidence that he would do that?

Damn! I wish my farts didn't smell. Just a few days ago, I farted and had to leave the room, it was so bad. Grandkids were asking, what smells so bad? Almost makes me want to be a leftist. At least when I fart I mean!

How do you read something "properly"? I read the words, I understand the words, I understand the meaning of the words, I understand the context of the word in their use. So tell me, how do I read something properly?

Let me see .... X previous to Elon owning it. Doing the bidding of the biden administration and censoring conservative speach. But, but, that is a private business the left said. X (or what ever it is called now) censoring certain speech by leftists, (I think it was incitation of violence, but I could be wrong about that ), speech that was in violations of the terms of service ... the left .... Elon is censoring free speech. The left, pushing the steele dossier as truth about Trump. Turns out it was the left and hillary paid to have the lies disseminated. The left, pushing, the hunter biden laptop is russian propaganda. Supported by news and democrat politicians. Turns out that it was misinformation but claiming it was, was democrat propaganda, AKA misinformation. How about leftist opinion that Trump is a racist and hates blacks, when he had received honors from black organizations. The leftist "opinion" about Trump is, leftist "misinformation"! " If you disagree with these, you claim they are lies.". Tell me where I claimed you were telling lies? Why Democrats must confront extreme left wing incitement to violence https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/516947-why-democrats-must-confront-extreme-left-wing-incitement-to-violence/

So, could you being a deranged man, also be a fact?

Didn't you insult harrisfan first? By writing, "you silly little man."?

What will Trump prohibit? Wearing of a T shirt with putin and hitler on it? Why what might happen next? Banning T shirts with che gavera's picture on it? (something I have seen in both U.S. and Thailand). Wouldn't allowing T shirt's with putin's and hitler's pictures on them, be something that the left would claim Trump would do? Doesn't the left claim that Trump is putin's lapdog and wearing a picture of putin would support Trump's lapdogginess? You know that Trump would not ban them, because, as you say, it is free speech. Stupid free speech, but free speech non the less. You are just spreading more "misinformation" as the left is wont to claim.

I have proven for myself, that google will not provide links for many searches. Sometimes it will not provide any links for the subject being searched for. This was proven by using the same search term with several other search engines that do provide several links regarding the search subject when google fails to provide any. U.S. Refugee law is not the 1951 convention nor is it the 1967 Protocol. My question to you was, "Can you reference the so called, "International Law" and if the United States is a signatory of that "International Law" that you mentioned. I also thought that this thread was about "illegal aliens", aliens who first violated U.S. immigration law and then commited criminal acts in the U.S.. Again, many of the illegal aliens have already been adjudicated and convicted of criminal acts and are being / have been deported. And a side question. Do you have any idea, what the illegal immigrants pay to the human trafficker's to help them move from countries in South America and to illegally enter the United States? I do!

Regarding, The 1951 Refugee Convention I used bing.com, not google. I read it to before posting my response to you. It supports what I have been writing. And it isn't international law.

If you apply for a visa to the U.S. and have been found to support terrorist organizations, you can be denied a visa. If you are in the U.S. and have been found to support terrorist organizations, you can lose your visa and be deported. Terrorism-Related Inadmissibility Grounds (TRIG) Generally, any individual who is a member of a “terrorist organization” or who has engaged or engages in terrorism-related activity as defined by the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) is “inadmissible” (not allowed to enter) the United States and is ineligible for most immigration benefits. The definition of terrorism-related activity is relatively broad and may apply to individuals and activities not commonly thought to be associated with terrorism. As a result, Congress created a statutory exemption provision through which the Secretaries of Homeland Security and State may exempt individuals from the grounds of inadmissibility. Inadmissibility Congress has determined that some individuals should not be allowed entry into the United States. The reasons individuals are denied admission vary and can be found in INA section 212, codified as Title 8 of the U.S. Code, section 1182. Terrorism-related inadmissibility grounds (TRIG), exclude persons who have participated in various kinds of activity, including activity that is generally illegal and/or violent. The grounds for inadmissibility include, but are not limited to, individuals who: Engaged in ‘terrorist activity;’” Are engaged or are likely to engage in terrorist activity after entry; Incited terrorist activity with intent to cause serious bodily harm or death; Are representatives or current members of a terrorist organization; Endorsed or espoused terrorist activity; <---<< Received military-type training from or on behalf of a terrorist organization; or Are spouses or children of anyone who has engaged in terrorist activity within the last five years (with certain exceptions). en·dorse /inˈdôrs,enˈdôrs/ https://ssl.gstatic.com/dictionary/static/promos/20181204/pronunciation.svg verb past tense: endorsed; past participle: endorsed 1. declare one's public approval or support of. recommend (a product) in an advertisement. (Hamas literature)

Scratch "Egyptian Submarine Trip" off my bucket list.

Off topic of Thailand scams. This stuff happens in the United States too. I have received 2 scam emails for the EZPASS system I customer of. My website email company put them into my scam folder. Checking on the return email address I saw they were not from EZPASS.

My wife has told me that the collapsed building was a project for the government. I cannot attest to the accuracy of that claim.

Most of the "illegal aliens" currently being deported, some of which I have read applied for asylum, have been arrested and charged with committing criminal acts, in the United States, in violation of American law, then released by democrat party supporting judges. Some of the deported have been adjudicated in a court of law and served time in jail or prison and are also being deported. Some of the deported have been, what you could call, collateral damage, i.e. they were with the criminal aliens at the time ICE picked up the criminal aliens and were also deported, because they violated Federal Immigration Laws, by illegally entering the United States. All illegal aliens, have committed a criminal act on entering the United States when they do not enter at an official port of entry. The biden administration was playing games with the immigration law by accepting applications by a "criminal alien" that did not follow immigration law and going through a legal port of entry. Immigration law allows "criminal aliens" (you know the adults that paid human traffickers to help them enter the United States illegally) to be deported, without going through a court of law. Can you reference the so called, "International Law" and if the United States is a signatory of that "International Law"?

Have you ever read the U.S. laws regarding illegal aliens? If not, you should. I have. While reading those laws, when any section, or paragraph that makes a reference to a different law, you should go and read that law as well. Not just the referenced part, as just that part may not make sense regarding the previous law, but the entire law that includes the referenced part. I won't speak to the immediacy of deportations, but "any "illegal alien" accused of rape (or any crime) while in the US ... can be .... deported." Not only can an "illegal alien" be deported for violation of criminal law while in the United States or in their country of origin, but "legal aliens" can be deported for violation of criminal law, while in the United States or outside of the United States in their country of origin or any other country they may have been in prior to being in the United States. In some rare cases, a Naturalized Citizen of the United States can and has been deported from the United States, back to their country of origin, after violation of felony level, criminal law as well as losing their U.S. citizenship.

Been going on for years. I heard/read about it .. I am sure that there are more than the list below. The question is, why, with the millions that biden let in, was the returns and removals so low? And look at the numbers by clinton and obama, you know, democrat presidents!! They have put Trump to shame!! | President | Returns | Removals | |—————-|————-|————| | Reagan | 7,992,746 | 100,000 | | H.W. Bush | 4,728,471 | 200,000 | | Clinton | 10,000,905 | 870,000 | | W. Bush | 10,039,724 | 2,000,000 | | Obama | 2,000,000 | 3,000,000 | | Trump | 500,000 | 2,000,000 | | Biden | 100,000 | 500,000 | Deportation vs. Removal – Legal Distinctions 1. How is deportation different from removal? https://www.uscisguide.com/living/deportation-vs-removal-legal-distinctions/

The quality and content of his posts (not just in the thread but all the others too), displays the quality and content of his character!

Does anyone have any idea why there is paper covering the slide of the pistol and wrapped around the magazine?

I have always thought it was worse.

You do not understand that a larger and stronger adult can physically overpower the child that he is raping? You don't consider that rape of a child is less of a crime than the rape of an adult who is not physically incapacitated?

Yeah. Right! A cousin and his son were killed by a drunk driver! The driver was a man.