radiochaser

What will Trump prohibit? Wearing of a T shirt with putin and hitler on it? Why what might happen next? Banning T shirts with che gavera's picture on it? (something I have seen in both U.S. and Thailand). Wouldn't allowing T shirt's with putin's and hitler's pictures on them, be something that the left would claim Trump would do? Doesn't the left claim that Trump is putin's lapdog and wearing a picture of putin would support Trump's lapdogginess? You know that Trump would not ban them, because, as you say, it is free speech. Stupid free speech, but free speech non the less. You are just spreading more "misinformation" as the left is wont to claim.

I have proven for myself, that google will not provide links for many searches. Sometimes it will not provide any links for the subject being searched for. This was proven by using the same search term with several other search engines that do provide several links regarding the search subject when google fails to provide any. U.S. Refugee law is not the 1951 convention nor is it the 1967 Protocol. My question to you was, "Can you reference the so called, "International Law" and if the United States is a signatory of that "International Law" that you mentioned. I also thought that this thread was about "illegal aliens", aliens who first violated U.S. immigration law and then commited criminal acts in the U.S.. Again, many of the illegal aliens have already been adjudicated and convicted of criminal acts and are being / have been deported. And a side question. Do you have any idea, what the illegal immigrants pay to the human trafficker's to help them move from countries in South America and to illegally enter the United States? I do!

Regarding, The 1951 Refugee Convention I used bing.com, not google. I read it to before posting my response to you. It supports what I have been writing. And it isn't international law.

If you apply for a visa to the U.S. and have been found to support terrorist organizations, you can be denied a visa. If you are in the U.S. and have been found to support terrorist organizations, you can lose your visa and be deported. Terrorism-Related Inadmissibility Grounds (TRIG) Generally, any individual who is a member of a “terrorist organization” or who has engaged or engages in terrorism-related activity as defined by the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) is “inadmissible” (not allowed to enter) the United States and is ineligible for most immigration benefits. The definition of terrorism-related activity is relatively broad and may apply to individuals and activities not commonly thought to be associated with terrorism. As a result, Congress created a statutory exemption provision through which the Secretaries of Homeland Security and State may exempt individuals from the grounds of inadmissibility. Inadmissibility Congress has determined that some individuals should not be allowed entry into the United States. The reasons individuals are denied admission vary and can be found in INA section 212, codified as Title 8 of the U.S. Code, section 1182. Terrorism-related inadmissibility grounds (TRIG), exclude persons who have participated in various kinds of activity, including activity that is generally illegal and/or violent. The grounds for inadmissibility include, but are not limited to, individuals who: Engaged in ‘terrorist activity;’” Are engaged or are likely to engage in terrorist activity after entry; Incited terrorist activity with intent to cause serious bodily harm or death; Are representatives or current members of a terrorist organization; Endorsed or espoused terrorist activity; <---<< Received military-type training from or on behalf of a terrorist organization; or Are spouses or children of anyone who has engaged in terrorist activity within the last five years (with certain exceptions). en·dorse /inˈdôrs,enˈdôrs/ https://ssl.gstatic.com/dictionary/static/promos/20181204/pronunciation.svg verb past tense: endorsed; past participle: endorsed 1. declare one's public approval or support of. recommend (a product) in an advertisement. (Hamas literature)

Scratch "Egyptian Submarine Trip" off my bucket list.

Off topic of Thailand scams. This stuff happens in the United States too. I have received 2 scam emails for the EZPASS system I customer of. My website email company put them into my scam folder. Checking on the return email address I saw they were not from EZPASS.

My wife has told me that the collapsed building was a project for the government. I cannot attest to the accuracy of that claim.

Most of the "illegal aliens" currently being deported, some of which I have read applied for asylum, have been arrested and charged with committing criminal acts, in the United States, in violation of American law, then released by democrat party supporting judges. Some of the deported have been adjudicated in a court of law and served time in jail or prison and are also being deported. Some of the deported have been, what you could call, collateral damage, i.e. they were with the criminal aliens at the time ICE picked up the criminal aliens and were also deported, because they violated Federal Immigration Laws, by illegally entering the United States. All illegal aliens, have committed a criminal act on entering the United States when they do not enter at an official port of entry. The biden administration was playing games with the immigration law by accepting applications by a "criminal alien" that did not follow immigration law and going through a legal port of entry. Immigration law allows "criminal aliens" (you know the adults that paid human traffickers to help them enter the United States illegally) to be deported, without going through a court of law. Can you reference the so called, "International Law" and if the United States is a signatory of that "International Law"?

Have you ever read the U.S. laws regarding illegal aliens? If not, you should. I have. While reading those laws, when any section, or paragraph that makes a reference to a different law, you should go and read that law as well. Not just the referenced part, as just that part may not make sense regarding the previous law, but the entire law that includes the referenced part. I won't speak to the immediacy of deportations, but "any "illegal alien" accused of rape (or any crime) while in the US ... can be .... deported." Not only can an "illegal alien" be deported for violation of criminal law while in the United States or in their country of origin, but "legal aliens" can be deported for violation of criminal law, while in the United States or outside of the United States in their country of origin or any other country they may have been in prior to being in the United States. In some rare cases, a Naturalized Citizen of the United States can and has been deported from the United States, back to their country of origin, after violation of felony level, criminal law as well as losing their U.S. citizenship.

Been going on for years. I heard/read about it .. I am sure that there are more than the list below. The question is, why, with the millions that biden let in, was the returns and removals so low? And look at the numbers by clinton and obama, you know, democrat presidents!! They have put Trump to shame!! | President | Returns | Removals | |—————-|————-|————| | Reagan | 7,992,746 | 100,000 | | H.W. Bush | 4,728,471 | 200,000 | | Clinton | 10,000,905 | 870,000 | | W. Bush | 10,039,724 | 2,000,000 | | Obama | 2,000,000 | 3,000,000 | | Trump | 500,000 | 2,000,000 | | Biden | 100,000 | 500,000 | Deportation vs. Removal – Legal Distinctions 1. How is deportation different from removal? https://www.uscisguide.com/living/deportation-vs-removal-legal-distinctions/

The quality and content of his posts (not just in the thread but all the others too), displays the quality and content of his character!

Does anyone have any idea why there is paper covering the slide of the pistol and wrapped around the magazine?

I have always thought it was worse.

You do not understand that a larger and stronger adult can physically overpower the child that he is raping? You don't consider that rape of a child is less of a crime than the rape of an adult who is not physically incapacitated?

Yeah. Right! A cousin and his son were killed by a drunk driver! The driver was a man.

No, Army Security Agency personnel were in Vietnam in 1960. First official American military death was in 1961. I worked with people during my time in Vietnam starting late 1970, who were in Vietnam then. I had instructors in my MOS that were also in Vietnam during that time. I agreed with someone else, that a president, other than Kennedy, was first sending military in. Kennedy, I believe, is the one that authorized ASA personnel. They were the ones that were the first Americans involved in the conflict there. I do think that some other American military were wounded or killed as a result of the conflict, but as collateral damage between South Vietnamese Army and the communists. From what I remember, they were there training the South Vietnamese on the U.S. military equipment provided them by the U.S.

If you mean the French version of Vietnam war, no, I think it was the Vietnamese version of communists.

Yeah, I think you are right about that. I think Kennedy authorized the Army elements that I worked with to go into Vietnam in 1960.

Deleted

Oooohhhhhh.. Look at that nasty comment/question!!!

Even Thailand had military fighting in Vietnam.

Kennedy started Vietnam. Some of the people I worked with, from late 1970 through early 1973, had a tour or two, in Vietnam starting in 1960!

Off on a tangent here .. According to a brief internet search, there were 2.7 - 3.1 million American military personnel, that were there, participating in the Vietnam war. If you include the non Vietnamese militaries, there were a lot more too. Also, between 9 and 12 million people claim to have been there, participating in the Vietnam war. I am guessing that half of the 9 - 12 million Americans that claim/claimed they were there, cannot prove they were there, because their service there was ... dum, dum, dum, dummmmmmmm, classified "TOP SECRET"!!!! I get a chuckle, sometimes, about those classified claims. I had to have a TOP SECRET clearance before I could start my MOS training. My MOS school notebook was classified SECRET with a CODE WORD. But what I was training to be, was not classified. What I did in Vietnam was not classified, just the product of the works was classified and nowadays, much of that has been declassified too. (for those that don't know and get upset with upper case words, the words CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET, and TOP SECRET, when properly used to classify a document, are always written in upper case font)

Define what you mean by a "proper war"?

Took 10-15 seconds to get the link. It has taken longer to respond and post the link. You too, can do this. https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/03/fact-check-president-trump-will-always-protect-social-security-medicare/