tilaceer

Apparently you dont do sarcasm.

Suggest you ask Frank....as per his previous comment...

Other source, not sources, and Sky News ????????? post a video of the interview rather than some rightwing hack 'interpretation' of it

The whole embarrassing mess is available on the Bloomberg YT channel. Trump starts about an hour in. Trump was not getting hostile questions and grilled in that interview. John was overly polite and respectful, and indeed let Trump ramble on various occasions, even after being insulted by Trump. He was just trying to keep Trump on point, and to fact check when Trump started lying, which began after the first question. Trumps modus operandi is just to start talking, (and sniffing), and to keep rambling, (and sniffing), and not let the interviewer take back control. His "weave" ramblings remind me of Grampa Simpson, except Simpson is just a comical cartoon character....oh wait !!!

Imagine the MAGA reaction on here if Biden or Harris had acted in this extremely peculiar way. Being totally unsympathetic to anyone but himself, Trump could have continued bloviating in his usual way for the rest of the rally except rather his brain went on a space walk, which seems to be happening a lot more recently. I do not know what was more cringeworthy. Trumps attempt at dancing or Kristi Noem's trying to get jiggy with it. And what is the story about Trump's makeup ???? He has gone from orange to a nut brown for the front with a circle of pasty white at the back. Is he going for a tobacco sunburst look ?

Yahoo, or its employees, did not write this article. It was written by freelance writer and fact checker Paige Oamek, and utilised in various publications. Forbes, The Guardian, New York Times, Bloomberg, CNN, Al Jazeera, Washington Post, PBS, AP News, Newsweek and others, have also published similar articles describing the same, so it seems somewhat disingenuous to dismiss what is being presented just because its on one news service that you do not like.

Dunno 'bout that. You seem to seek a lot of attention on here with irrelevant posts such as this one.

Rash generalisation. I watched the debate and if I had to declare a winner, I would say Walz overall did a better job than Vance.

It's not in the past, despite what Vance, and others, want people to believe to avoid addressing the question. Trump is still spreading the lie that the 2020 election was stolen as part of his 2024 political campaign. His refusal, (as well as his acolyte's), to admit that there wasn't any widespread corruption in the 2020 election that impacted the outcome in anyway is still being used to create unrest in his extreme supporter base, in the eventuality that he loses again. When/if he loses in November, he and his base, will not accept the results of the election, (he has said as much), and once again it can be expected that, he will use whatever means he has at his disposal to try and grab power. Until Trump admits publicly that the 2020 election was not stolen, then this issue will never remain in the past. As evidenced on this forum, there are those who, despite any evidence to the contrary, still believe that he won.

You are just a troll.

Link supporting your claim please. All 7 swing states !

Surprisingly, like his sneakers, bible and everything else he has tried to grift off, these watch experts are not impressed by the timepieces Trump is trying to flog to his acolytes. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lifestyle/style/trump-watch-likely-made-in-china-overpriced-1236013728/

He plants things...

So how is this new bill differ an improvement from the legislation that is already in place ? This question has been asked multiple times. You ignore this question and yet continue to advocate what a great bill it is, and how despicable 158 Dems are ? Bet you are not going to answer it this time either. Political posturing.

He doesn't even have to open his gob !

It's a nothing burger, yet Trump is fixated by whether she worked there are not, or is it just because it is food related ? (they're eating our dawgs, she never made french fries !). She said she worked there as a student, so what ? Is it seen as some type of conspiracy to align with the common man ? If it was, I think she could do better than lie about working at a burger joint. Trump just can't let it go though. His rallies have turned into just nonsensical rants that have very little value, or indeed contain anything that his supporter base haven't already heard over the last 8 years. I am starting to agree with Michael Popok from Legal AF that Trump has given up, and his main priority now is to grift as much money as he can.....pssssst wanna buy a watch ? He is weird.

From Hurs own report. 1. Lack of Evidence of Knowledge that Information Was Classified. 2. Lack of Evidence of Willful Retention 3. Lack of Evidence of Willful Disclosure 4. Lack of Evidence of Transportation of Documents 5. Lack of Evidence of Possession 6. Evidence of Intent to Return Classified Documents 7. Evidence of Belief that Documents Were Permissibly Retained, e.g., as “Personal Records” 8. Evidence of Retention By Mistake We have concluded that there is not a prosecutable case against Biden. The full article: https://www.justsecurity.org/92090/the-real-robert-hur-report-versus-what-you-read-in-the-news/ So no, I wasn't sleeping. I remember that the Hur report came to nothing, unlike Trumps will. Now, as I have your attention. What About Pence ??? <<<<<----------

sure he did....I'm calling BS on that...What about Pence .. was he too befuddled as well ?

If he had committed the same offence, then yes. But posts detailing the differences have been supplied ad nauseam. So you think Pence should have been prosecuted for the same offense?

If it was LMOP, I would certainly suggest that the methane acronym is appropriate. However, I do believe that what he is saying is, IMOP :- In My Own Opinion. Possibly a way of not providing any substantiation.

Neither can 99.9% of the legal profession.

As reported by The Hill: For the purpose of assigning judges Fort Pierce is treated as part of the neighbouring Palm Beach Division. There are three federal district judges in Palm Beach, one of whom is a senior judge. And from The Guardian: Two senior judges on the Florida bench urged Cannon to defer when it was randomly assigned to her last June, in part due to a perception that she was biased in Trump’s favour because of her actions after the allegations against him of illegally retaining sensitive government documents first came to light.

This will give her something to do when the 11th Circuit recuse her from the documents case, (strike 3 ). Inept, overwhelmed and extremely biased, most likely because she is eyeing a spot on the Supreme Court should her patron prevail.

Once again you focus on student deferrals to try and obfuscate.. THAT is not the issue. In this repeat discussion, I am only referring to medical deferments. One was legitimate. One was illegal. Nothing will change that.