Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Airlines Reject Thailand’s Proposed Tourism Fee Plan

The Thai government’s plan to collect a tourism fee of at least 300 baht through airlines has encountered another obstacle after aviation bodies said the proposal is impractical. Industry representatives argue that airlines’ booking and back-office systems are not designed to collect the charge and have instead recommended using the Thailand Digital Arrival Card (TDAC) system, which foreign visitors must complete before entering the country.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The Ministry of Tourism and Sports last month asked airlines to act as intermediaries to collect the fee on behalf of the government. Under the National Tourism Policy Act, Thai citizens are exempt from the levy, making it unlawful to charge them. The ministry suggested airlines collect the fee from all passengers before reimbursing Thai travellers, with the government covering the administrative costs.

However, Sheldon Hee, Regional Vice-President for Asia-Pacific at the International Air Transport Association (IATA), said the proposal would create unnecessary complications. He noted that airlines generally do not require passengers to provide nationality, passport details or residential addresses when initially booking flights, as only a passenger’s name and destination are typically needed.

Mr Hee said the TDAC digital immigration system would provide a more suitable platform because it is already mandatory for foreign visitors entering Thailand. Aviation stakeholders and the Airlines Association of Thailand (AAT) supported this approach during a recent meeting with officials from the Tourism Ministry.

The AAT said Thai airlines operate different reservation and back-office systems, while more than 100 foreign airlines also serve Thailand. Embedding the tourism fee into airfares across so many carriers would add significant complexity. The association added that TDAC is managed by the Immigration Bureau and reports directly to the government, making it a more appropriate mechanism than relying on independent airlines.

The tourism fee was first proposed in 2020 but has yet to be introduced because of repeated government changes and technical challenges. Most of the revenue is intended to fund insurance for tourists, while the remainder would be used to maintain tourist attractions and improve infrastructure.

The Bangkokpost reported that the final amount of the levy will depend largely on the projected cost of accident insurance and treatment at private hospitals. Studies have found that unpaid medical bills left by foreign visitors cost Thai hospitals around 2.5 billion baht each year.

Join the discussion? image.png

image.png

10 July 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

atpeace Platinum Member

atpeace

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, Dan O said:

These nunbers are skewed since the majority of them come ftom Pattaya and Phuket. Most other areas other than bkk arent even in the count in any significance

I don't have a clue but regardless they are tiny in the grand scheme of things. My hunch is your wrong and the majority comes from Bangkok but just as hunch.

jcmj Gold Member

jcmj

Advanced Member

They are just trying to keep their charges hidden in the ticket. Face the facts of what you want to do and show us the amount made every year and what it was used for. I think they know that they can’t show the figures and prove it.

Dan O Ruby Member

Dan O

Advanced Member
Just now, atpeace said:

I don't have a clue but regardless they are tiny in the grand scheme of things. My hunch is your wrong and the majority comes from Bangkok but just as hunch.

The last article i read 6 or 8 months ago that went into any real depth the bulk are in Phuket or maybe because they have the loudest voice.

Just now, atpeace said:

I don't have a clue but regardless they are tiny in the grand scheme of things. My hunch is your wrong and the majority comes from Bangkok but just as hunch.

BusyB Platinum Member

BusyB

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, Chivas said:

Agree entirely. Never happened to me. Have been admitted 3 times down the years (all pretty minor) but never remotely asked for payment guarantees up front

Me neither. But once a session is completed a nurse attaches herself to me and 'accompanies' me to the cashier/pharmacy. They're always between me and the nearest exit and hold their arm out front to 'guide' me along.

Pneumonia, CTs, minor surgeries. My insurance always paid despite what the naysayers claim. You get what you pay for.

Ralf001 Star Member

Ralf001

Advanced Member

Why wo

1 minute ago, BusyB said:

Me neither. But once a session is completed a nurse attaches herself to me and 'accompanies' me to the cashier/pharmacy. They're always between me and the nearest exit and hold their arm out front to 'guide' me along.

Pneumonia, CTs, minor surgeries. My insurance always paid despite what the naysayers claim. You get what you pay for.

My private insurance refused to cover pnuemonia in 2023 citing pre-existing condition linking to a TIA I had in 2014!

Dan O Ruby Member

Dan O

Advanced Member
18 minutes ago, Ralf001 said:

Why wo

My private insurance refused to cover pnuemonia in 2023 citing pre-existing condition linking to a TIA I had in 2014!

Well of course. They will use every excuse to avoid paying.

kinyara Gold Member

kinyara

Advanced Member
(edited)

15 minutes ago, jcmj said:

They are just trying to keep their charges hidden in the ticket. Face the facts of what you want to do and show us the amount made every year and what it was used for. I think they know that they can’t show the figures and prove it.

This is exactly as I see it. They are attempting to bring in a charge that their competing tourist countries as far as I'm aware don't levy so want to hide it as far as possible.

Why not make insurance compulsory for tourists ? Probably because they know that will also have a big hit on tourist numbers as their main markets are lower budget tourists, regardless of their desire for higher quality/spending tourists. Compulsory insurance also means there is not a lovely big pot of circa 10 billion baht annually to skim from. I'm sure the "admin" costs of managing the fund will be the least transparent of the whole charade.

Edited by kinyara
Double quote

ikke1959 Diamond Member

ikke1959

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, KhunHeineken said:

I posted the Thai government can compensate the airlines for their main frame programming to cater for it.

I also said I oppose the tax.

What's the alternative? Standing in a long queue at the airport, behind some newbie to Thailand, while they fumble around trying to pay cash?

If the Thai Government has to pay for it, the fee will not be 300 THB but much more...

ronnie50 Platinum Member

ronnie50

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, kinyara said:

They are attempting to bring in a charge that their competing tourist countries as far as I'm aware don't levy so want to hide it as far as possible

They can just call it a landing fee or temporary residence fee. I agree don't call it a Tourist Tax!

jts-khorat Gold Member

jts-khorat

Advanced Member
9 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

Industry representatives argue that airlines’ booking and back-office systems are not designed to collect the charge and have instead recommended using the Thailand Digital Arrival Card (TDAC) system, which foreign visitors must complete before entering the country.

The same comnplaint by the airlines was already brought years ago, the first time the Thai government tried to introduce this -- so, no surprise there.

It is not just Thailand, where politicians simply go for another round of their same stupid and technically unfeasible ideas, if they are denied the first time. This opens months or maybe years of financed committees, brown envelopes and opportunities being quoted in the newspaper, making it pure grift.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.