Accused Assassin Laughs in Court as Charlie Kirk's Widow Cries... The Rotten Fruit of Anarchist Politics.

The accused killer of Charlie Kirk was caught laughing and smirking with his lawyer in court while Erika Kirk sat there in tears and had to leave the room during the testimony. It's disgusting to see, it's the ugly end result of years of treating anyone on the right as pure evil who deserves to be shut down . They spend years calling conservatives fascists and spreading nonstop hate.

Kirk wasn't in government, he was just speaking his mind and building something , he was destroying the left's indoctrination attempts by teaching kids to think for themselves instead of swallowing all the hate and division they're pushing in schools and on social media but that was enough to mark him. This is what the anarchist style push to silence opposition looks like, first the words, then the bullets, and in between moments like this where the killer sits there laughing like it's all a big joke.

The story is based on a SkyNews.com au report

1 hour ago, riclag said:

The accused killer of Charlie Kirk was caught laughing and smirking with his lawyer

Perhaps they were laughing at the absurdity of it all ?

Real tears?.......No flash-bangs, tinsel showers, strobes......just tears?

3 minutes ago, johng said:

Perhaps they were laughing at the absurdity of it all ?

Thanks for sharing

Its much more than this , the progressive far left is on trial ! And it couldn't of come at a better time for the future of the left in the USA, exposing the radical left resistance.

"The accused assassin is in court facing a 5 day preliminary trial into his fate".

"Charlie Kirk's alleged killer faces widow Erika in emotional courtroom moment"

35 minutes ago, riclag said:

Its much more than this , the progressive far left is on trial ! And it couldn't of come at a better time for the future of the left in the USA, exposing the radical left resistance.

"The accused assassin is in court facing a 5 day preliminary trial into his fate".

"Charlie Kirk's alleged killer faces widow Erika in emotional courtroom moment"

For those who dismiss the assassination event, all the evidence will be presented,especially one most disturbing,as the accused inscribed casing has lmao ...

"The unfired bullet casings had inscriptions, Cox said. The first one said, “Hey fascist!” The second unfired casing had written on it the lyrics of the Italian folk song “Bella Ciao,” and the third one said “if you read this, you are gay, lmao,” according to Cox".

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/5502176-kirk-murder-suspect-leftist-cox-report/

Edited July 7Jul 7 by riclag

There's only one reason for her to be there........crying and storming out.......publicity...........It has beed drying up for months now.....and the only bad publicity is no publicity.

15 minutes ago, riclag said:

all the evidence will be presented

Lets hope hey 'find' the video of the accused laying prone on the roof taking the shot.

3 minutes ago, johng said:

Lets hope hey 'find' the video of the accused laying prone on the roof taking the shot.

I haven't even got past the hey fascist catch this text and the LMAO inscribed bullet casing that will be discussed in court . It’s amazing how dismissive a segment of the international left can be when it comes to actually condemning an assassination cult.

But hey it goes with the accused demeanor, he laughs and Kirks wife crys.

Edited July 7Jul 7 by riclag

3 hours ago, riclag said:

Accused Assassin Laughs in Court as Charlie Kirk's Widow Cries... The Rotten Fruit of Anarchist Politics.

The accused killer of Charlie Kirk was caught laughing and smirking with his lawyer in court while Erika Kirk sat there in tears and had to leave the room during the testimony. It's disgusting to see, it's the ugly end result of years of treating anyone on the right as pure evil who deserves to be shut down . They spend years calling conservatives fascists and spreading nonstop hate.

Kirk wasn't in government, he was just speaking his mind and building something , he was destroying the left's indoctrination attempts by teaching kids to think for themselves instead of swallowing all the hate and division they're pushing in schools and on social media but that was enough to mark him. This is what the anarchist style push to silence opposition looks like, first the words, then the bullets, and in between moments like this where the killer sits there laughing like it's all a big joke.

The story is based on a SkyNews.com au report

all for the show and publicity and on top of that the poster has to make it political, the MAGA can not post anything without mentioning the "radical left" it's sad

25 minutes ago, riclag said:

I haven't even got past the hey fascist catch this text and the LMAO inscribed bullet casing that will be discussed in court

There is so much of the 'story' that just doesn't add up..maybe the evidence will be revealed during the trial..but I wont be holding my breath.

Have you looked at what Candice Owens has been digging up ?

it's interesting stuff.

5 minutes ago, johng said:

There is so much of the 'story' that just doesn't add up..maybe the evidence will be revealed during the trial..but I wont be holding my breath.

Have you looked at what Candice Owens has been digging up ?

it's interesting stuff.

Evidence vs conspiracy theory hearsay nonsense from Owens! For me, what doesn't add up is how anyone can look at the actual evidence being read into the record,like the suspect's notes about his mission or the inscribed casing,and try to minimize it. No matter what independent analysts dig up about the logistics, the level of premeditation coming out in court points straight to a cold blooded ambush, and it's wild to see people online still treating it lightly. It says a lot about the far left extremist & their assassination cult.

4 hours ago, riclag said:

Accused Assassin Laughs in Court as Charlie Kirk's Widow Cries... The Rotten Fruit of Anarchist Politics.

The accused killer of Charlie Kirk was caught laughing and smirking with his lawyer in court while Erika Kirk sat there in tears and had to leave the room during the testimony. It's disgusting to see, it's the ugly end result of years of treating anyone on the right as pure evil who deserves to be shut down . They spend years calling conservatives fascists and spreading nonstop hate.

Kirk wasn't in government, he was just speaking his mind and building something , he was destroying the left's indoctrination attempts by teaching kids to think for themselves instead of swallowing all the hate and division they're pushing in schools and on social media but that was enough to mark him. This is what the anarchist style push to silence opposition looks like, first the words, then the bullets, and in between moments like this where the killer sits there laughing like it's all a big joke.

The story is based on a SkyNews.com au report

He was a registered voter from a Republican voting family who was not affiliated with either party and hadn't voted in years. Being anti-Nazi does not make him a progressive. Maybe the trial will shine some light on how he came to believe in his mind that shooting Kirk was the right thing to do.

44 minutes ago, bunnydrops said:

He was a registered voter from a Republican voting family who was not affiliated with either party and hadn't voted in years. Being anti-Nazi does not make him a progressive. Maybe the trial will shine some light on how he came to believe in his mind that shooting Kirk was the right thing to do.

The amount of spin to justify the current leftist state of mind is off the charts.

THE FACTS: . "Utah records say Robinson was registered as a voter, but not affiliated with either political party. His voter status is inactive, meaning he did not vote in two regular general elections after receiving a notice from his county clerk. According to Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, Robinson's family said he had become “more political in recent years” and had criticized Kirk, mentioning that he was due to appear at an event in Utah and saying “Kirk was full of hate and spreading hate.”

https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/politics/fact-focus-assassination-of-charlie-kirk-prompts-flood-of-false-and-misleading-claims-online/3900363/

The face & words of the current political left. They claim to be against "hate", but the second someone they disagree with is assassinated, they celebrate a cold blooded murder with words like "Splat" & skin color politics. It shows exactly the kind of toxic, radicalized mindset that is currently on trial in Utah.

13 minutes ago, riclag said:

The amount of spin to justify the current leftist state of mind is off the charts.

THE FACTS: . "Utah records say Robinson was registered as a voter, but not affiliated with either political party. His voter status is inactive, meaning he did not vote in two regular general elections after receiving a notice from his county clerk. According to Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, Robinson's family said he had become “more political in recent years” and had criticized Kirk, mentioning that he was due to appear at an event in Utah and saying “Kirk was full of hate and spreading hate.”

https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/politics/fact-focus-assassination-of-charlie-kirk-prompts-flood-of-false-and-misleading-claims-online/3900363/

That is what I said! He disliked Kirk, as we know, but we do not know what his beliefs were.

Edited July 7Jul 7 by bunnydrops

10 minutes ago, bunnydrops said:

That is what I said! He disliked Kirk, as we know, but we do not know what his beliefs were.

Keep dreamin, his mom called out the radicalness ,the people who actually knew him best recognized what was happening.

2 hours ago, Mavideol said:

all for the show and publicity and on top of that the poster has to make it political, the MAGA can not post anything without mentioning the "radical left" it's sad

Can you name a topic that the left hasn't politicized?

2 hours ago, Mavideol said:

all for the show and publicity and on top of that the poster has to make it political, the MAGA can not post anything without mentioning the "radical left" it's sad

What astounding irony in your comment.

Hahahahaha classic

Edited July 7Jul 7 by blaze master

His mom and family explicitly called out his sudden shift, telling the Governor he'd become heavily political in recent years and obsessed with criticizing Kirk. When someone writes a manifest style note about taking out a conservative target and inscribes far left anarchist slogans on the shell casings, we know exactly what his beliefs were.

It's all coming out, and perfect timing, I might add! Look at the national trend of leftist politics, Violence, Anarchist ,Communist while moderates condemning it.

Antifa members recently being handed down almost 500 combined yrs for crimes in the ICE facility shooting, the DSA openly affiliating with self described Maoists / Marxist/Leninists, and even Former Dem Sen Manchin and Dem Fetterman publicly describing just how far left the Dem Big Tent party has become.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/06/charlie-kirk-killing-hearing-begins

Edited July 7Jul 7 by riclag

6 hours ago, riclag said:

Kirk wasn't in government, he was just speaking his mind and building something , he was destroying the left's indoctrination attempts by teaching kids to think for themselves instead of swallowing all the hate and division

Well, er, cough, Charlie preached some purty extreme stuff himself. White Christian nationalism (check his death video again, is there a single black person in the crowd?). Against universal healthcare. For homeschooling vs. going to school and getting a regular education (you's think a person wanting "kids to think for themselves" would want to base that on well-rounded education). And on and on.

All signs point to Charlie being a paid megacorp shill who masqueraded as an elderly college boy with bad hair.

Does this mean he deserved to be shot? Absolutely no. Tyler Robinson's a deranged weirdo. But to indict the whole left based on one bad apple? Well ... You really want a list of rightwing creeps who killed lefties? The problem isn't left or right. It's the propensity to violence in the US and the ease of getting guns.

"I disagree with every word you say but I'll defend to death your right to say it." Voltaire got it right.

Edited July 7Jul 7 by Autocan

3 hours ago, johng said:

Have you looked at what Candice Owens has been digging up ?

it's interesting stuff

well im sure it is to conspiracist jew haters

47 minutes ago, Autocan said:

Well ... You really want a list of rightwing creeps who killed lefties? The problem isn't left or right. It's the propensity to violence in the US and the ease of getting guns

go for it. prove your assertion with reputable statistics. bet ya the leftist murderers are far more numerous.

and if your statement as to propensity for violence is correct, then its urban blacks and illegal immigrants, right?

10 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

and if your statement as to propensity for violence is correct, then its urban blacks and illegal immigrants, right?

No. Here's AI:

"The U.S. experiences gun violence at rates exponentially higher than Europe. Firearm homicides are roughly 22 times more common in the United States than in the European Union, with U.S. rates averaging 4.12 per 100,000 people compared to Europe's 0.19 per 100,000."

Guess which one has the more severe immigration problem, US or Europe? Exactly. Yet Europe is 22 times safer.

The explanation why the US is forked up is the Second. Repeal the Second, make access to guns nearly impossible, and you'll have peace and calm. At least 22 times more than before.

I know why you're giggling. Ain't gonna happen. Not so quick. In about a year, thanks to social media, scales have dropped from people's eyes re Israel/AIPAC. What use to be unquestioned love has turned toxic. Mebee, just mebbe, people will figure out the NRA.

I'm optimistic. So sue me.

4 hours ago, johng said:

There is so much of the 'story' that just doesn't add up..maybe the evidence will be revealed during the trial..but I wont be holding my breath.

Have you looked at what Candice Owens has been digging up ?

it's interesting stuff.

I've seen some of Candace Owens' material.

She definitely raises a lot of questions and some of them are interesting.

But at this point I haven't seen her produce evidence that would let me conclude there's a cover-up or that the wrong person has been charged.

To me there's a difference between asking good questions and proving a case.

Therefore, I'm waiting to see what happens in court where the evidence can actually be examined and challenged.

I'll keep an open mind, but I'm also skeptical of claims that go beyond what has actually been proven.

4 hours ago, Mavideol said:

all for the show and publicity and on top of that the poster has to make it political, the MAGA can not post anything without mentioning the "radical left" it's sad

Are you serious?

No matter what Trump does, there are people who immediately assume the worst and turn it into a political attack.

What I also notice is that topics that have nothing to do with politics often end up becoming political because someone has to bring Trump into the discussion, just like you did here.

While there are certainly bad actors on all sides, I've seen people vandalize Teslas, harass supporters, call people "Nazis" or "fascists" simply because they support Trump and try to shame or intimidate people for having a different political opinion. That's not healthy political discourse.

If we're going to criticize political tribalism, then let's criticize it consistently instead of pretending it's only one side that's guilty of it.

1 hour ago, Autocan said:

Well, er, cough, Charlie preached some purty extreme stuff himself. White Christian nationalism (check his death video again, is there a single black person in the crowd?). Against universal healthcare. For homeschooling vs. going to school and getting a regular education (you's think a person wanting "kids to think for themselves" would want to base that on well-rounded education). And on and on.

All signs point to Charlie being a paid megacorp shill who masqueraded as an elderly college boy with bad hair.

Does this mean he deserved to be shot? Absolutely no. Tyler Robinson's a deranged weirdo. But to indict the whole left based on one bad apple? Well ... You really want a list of rightwing creeps who killed lefties? The problem isn't left or right. It's the propensity to violence in the US and the ease of getting guns.

"I disagree with every word you say but I'll defend to death your right to say it." Voltaire got it right.

I think you're missing an important distinction.

Charlie Kirk wasn't roaming the streets looking for confrontations. He went to college campuses, set up a table and invited students to come debate him.

Anyone was free to challenge him, agree with him or ignore him and walk away.

You may completely disagree with his views, but he was open about them. He believed many universities had become politically one-sided and that conservative viewpoints were often discouraged or misrepresented. Whether you agree with that or not, that's a legitimate topic for debate.

As for his audience, I don't judge someone's ideas by the racial makeup of the crowd. I judge them by the arguments they make.

And no, one murderer doesn't indict everyone on the left. But it's also fair to acknowledge that political rhetoric can become so extreme that some unstable people convince themselves violence is justified. That should concern everyone, regardless of whether the target is on the left or the right.

53 minutes ago, Autocan said:

No. Here's AI:

"The U.S. experiences gun violence at rates exponentially higher than Europe. Firearm homicides are roughly 22 times more common in the United States than in the European Union, with U.S. rates averaging 4.12 per 100,000 people compared to Europe's 0.19 per 100,000."

Guess which one has the more severe immigration problem, US or Europe? Exactly. Yet Europe is 22 times safer.

The explanation why the US is forked up is the Second. Repeal the Second, make access to guns nearly impossible, and you'll have peace and calm. At least 22 times more than before.

I know why you're giggling. Ain't gonna happen. Not so quick. In about a year, thanks to social media, scales have dropped from people's eyes re Israel/AIPAC. What use to be unquestioned love has turned toxic. Mebee, just mebbe, people will figure out the NRA.

I'm optimistic. So sue me.

I don't disagree that the U.S. has a lot more gun violence than the UK. That's pretty clear.

Where I disagree is the idea that if we just repealed the Second Amendment, everything would suddenly be peaceful.

The UK already had a much lower homicide rate before its modern handgun bans and after the 1997 handgun restrictions, murders did not magically disappear.

Actually the homicide rate rose for several years and peaked around 2002/03ish before later falling.

Today the UK still has murders, but they are just committed mostly with knives, sharp instruments, blunt force, etc.

The U.S. also has a very different set of problems than the UK. We have gangs, drug trafficking, millions more people, a huge number of illegal guns already on the streets and a Constitution that protects the right to own firearms.

I think it's way too simple to say guns are the only problem. If that were true, every place with strict gun laws would be crime free and they're not.

We need to go after violent criminals, gangs, repeat offenders and illegal guns. Taking guns away from law abiding people isn't going to magically fix everything.

Edited July 7Jul 7 by ericthai

14 minutes ago, ericthai said:

I think you're missing an important distinction.

Charlie Kirk wasn't roaming the streets looking for confrontations. He went to college campuses, set up a table and invited students to come debate him.

Anyone was free to challenge him, agree with him or ignore him and walk away.

I never said he was "looking for confrontations". He was an influencer, plain and simple, with an extreme rightwing ideology. He went to debates to bring young impressionable people to his POV. And he was successful. By all accounts he made a ton of money and helped put Trump in the WH. Good for him. Free country.

But to imply that he went into debates with an open mind is a tad disingenuous - there's zero instance of him on tape saying to a college student, Gee, you're right. Never occurred to me. I'll have to rethink this.

Otherwise, I am with you.

Edited July 7Jul 7 by Autocan

7 minutes ago, ericthai said:

We need to go after violent criminals, gangs, repeat offenders and illegal guns. Taking guns away from law abiding people isn't going to magically fix everything.

Yep

https://giffords.org/lawcenter/resources/gun-violence-statistics/

Edited July 7Jul 7 by TedG