Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Frenchman faces Koh Samui nominee business claims

Surat Thani Immigration Police are investigating a French businessman accused of using Thai nominees to control businesses and land on Koh Samui, including a 12-room property allegedly operating without a hotel licence.

Stephane Thierry Bastok, 74, is also facing separate legal proceedings over claims that he persuaded eight French nationals to invest about 3.3 million baht each, in a cannabis farm project that investigators say was never established.

The investigation forms part of "Crackdown on Foreign Nominee Networks, Phase 7", launched under policies set by National Police Chief Pol. Gen. Kittirat Phanphet and Pol. Gen. Samran Nualma, deputy national police chief and director of the Centre for the Suppression of Transnational Crime and Illegal Immigration.

On 15 August 2026, Immigration Bureau commissioner Pol. Lt. Gen. Phanumas Boonyalak ordered an inquiry through Immigration Division 6 commissioner Pol. Maj. Gen. Chuthares Yingyongdamrongsakul.

Koh Samui firms and accommodation examined

Pol. Col. Naruet Phutthawiro, superintendent of Surat Thani Immigration, said officers expanded their work after identifying suspicious company shareholding arrangements involving Thai nationals.

IMG_0361.png

Investigators linked Bastok to Ida B Co Ltd and IDA B Domain Co Ltd, which were involved in land ownership and accommodation businesses in Moo 5, Lipanoi subdistrict, Koh Samui district.

Ida B Co Ltd owns about 7 rai, 3 ngan and 80 square wah of land. A three-storey building was constructed there in 2021 and later operated as IDA B Domain, with 12 rooms, a restaurant, online daily booking advertisements and its own website targeting tourists.

However, officers found no hotel business licence issued by the Koh Samui district hotel registrar. Immigration records filed under Section 38 of the Immigration Act indicated short guest stays, while an application for a health-hazardous business licence described the operation as a 12-room rental business.

Ida B Co Ltd reported continuing losses and no genuine business income, officers said. Three Thai shareholders holding a combined 60% were restaurant employees and a driver, with no apparent capacity to fund such an investment.

IDA B Domain Co Ltd had two Thai shareholders holding 60%. One admitted he was an employee whose name was used as a director and document handler, without control over company finances.

Records showed more than 7.7 million baht transferred from company accounts to Bastok and more than 1.5 million baht to his son. Officers said this suggested Bastok supplied the funds and controlled both businesses.

Risks for foreign investors and nominees

For foreigners in Thailand, the case is a reminder that using Thai shareholders as stand-ins to bypass foreign business or land-ownership restrictions can expose both the foreign investor and Thai participants to prosecution. A Thai-registered company does not automatically make an arrangement lawful if its Thai shareholders are not genuine investors.

Pol. Lt. Col. Arun Musigim has filed a complaint against Bastok under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999), including Sections 8, 36, 37 and 41, and the Hotel Act B.E. 2547 (2004) for allegedly operating a hotel without a licence.

The two companies face allegations of allowing a foreigner to conduct business unlawfully, using Thai nominees and operating an unauthorised hotel. The five Thai nominees face allegations under Sections 36 and 41.

Bo Phut and Koh Samui police have completed the cannabis-farm case files and sent them to prosecutors. Immigration is also considering possible money-laundering action, including whether allegedly illegal proceeds funded investments.

Pol. Col. Naruet said officers had credible information that Bastok previously advertised a hotel, buildings and land for sale at 300 million baht.

IMG_0360.png

Pictures courtesy of Khoasod


Related story

Koh-Samui-nominee-crackdown-targets-60-companies


Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

17 August 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

jippytum Platinum Member

jippytum

Advanced Member

Look like the Frenchman's buisiness plan is is down the Swani.

NanLaew Star Member

NanLaew

Advanced Member
15 minutes ago, kingstonkid said:

Yeah, that is the part that pisses me off about this. Yes, the expat broke the law, but the Thais listed on the company also did. Why aren't they mentioned? Simple: the police and the media are afraid of being sued. Would love to hear that some of these expats tried the same tricks that Thais use and sued for defamation.

They are, as follows:

6 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

The five Thai nominees face allegations under Sections 36 and 41.

Nothing has been said of the lawyer or law company that facilitated this. However, as you suggest, that may be due to the Draconian libel laws that blight this enchanted kingdom.

As for suing the police, when has that ever happened? Typically, they need to be paid to pursue any arrest and prosecution, which is another blight.

riverhigh Silver Member

riverhigh

Advanced Member

No mention of the Thai law firm or lawyer that must have set up these dodgy French enterprises.

Malheureusement, quelle surprise... c'est dommage.

46 minutes ago, kingstonkid said:

Yeah, that is the part that pisses me off about this. Yes, the expat broke the law, but the Thais listed on the company also did. Why aren't they mentioned? Simple: the police and the media are afraid of being sued. Would love to hear that some of these expats tried the same tricks that Thais use and sued for defamation.

Agree, but besides the Thai defamation laws they have to show that the law firm was actively involved in setting up the illegal activies and not just provideing avise on setting up corporations. Based on the evidence provided, I have little doubt that the Frenchman is the ring leader and orchestrated every step of the illegal activites. Best to get the ring leader and the house of cards will fold. Fine, jail and deport with life ban.

riverhigh Silver Member

riverhigh

Advanced Member
34 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

I first fell from the sky in Pattaya in the late 70's and, like most of my fellow expat oilfield trash, we quickly learned that the Thai company vehicle to property ownership was a dodgy construct. So, how come foreigners are still falling for the age-old Thai property ownership scam?

People are people. They see their friends owning their dream home that they could not afford in their home country. Status, envy, the sense of making it in life. Until very recently, there was this feeling of safety in numbers and the "they wouldn't dare come after us because of the money we are bringing into Thailand"

NanLaew Star Member

NanLaew

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, riverhigh said:

People are people. They see their friends owning their dream home that they could not afford in their home country. Status, envy, the sense of making it in life. Until very recently, there was this feeling of safety in numbers and the "they wouldn't dare come after us because of the money we are bringing into Thailand"

Totally agree. Peer pressure and keeping up with the Joneses. Believing the self-delusional hubris of how significant the farang's collective financial contribution to Thailand is just plain dumb. Then they find a dodgy Thai lawyer to make their dream come true.

Now they'll need another one, just to keep their dumb asses out of jail before the inevitable deportation and blacklisting.

Liverpool Lou Star Member

Liverpool Lou

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, kingstonkid said:

Yeah, that is the part that pisses me off about this. Yes, the expat broke the law, but the Thais listed on the company also did. Why aren't they mentioned? Simple: the police and the media are afraid of being sued. .

Nonsense. Thai nominee shareholders holders were mentioned in the article and there is no chance that the police would be sued for prosecuting those Thais committing criminal offences.

Liverpool Lou Star Member

Liverpool Lou

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, ChipButty said:

It's time we heard the other side of the story from these Farang villain's and bandits,

I'm sure that if they had something justifiable to say about their part in the accusations it would have been reported already.

Liverpool Lou Star Member

Liverpool Lou

Advanced Member
36 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Now they'll need another one, just to keep their dumb asses out of jail before the inevitable deportation and blacklisting

It's far from inevitable that they will be jailed then deported and blacklisted.

KhunHeineken Diamond Member

KhunHeineken

Advanced Member
15 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

It's far from inevitable that they will be jailed then deported and blacklisted.

I've posted the laws for you previously.

norsurin Gold Member

norsurin

Advanced Member

What a scumbag even scammed other foreigners for 3,3 million baht.Hope he get jailtime and deported the rest of his life.Also hope the people he scammed will find him one day and really let him pay them back the hard way.

sunrisecoconuts Explorer Member

sunrisecoconuts

Member
(edited)

That place even has things like a sauna/spa, padel and tennis court, double pools on insane sea view etc etc. He would not 'scam' people for just 10M baht, just that Ida B Domain is worth over 1-1.5M USD. Seems he is friendly with them too, doubt he is even closed. They also give people either way 6 months to 'fix it'. It used to be a live stream on youtube with the top pool, there is another on a lower level.

Edited by sunrisecoconuts

NanLaew Star Member

NanLaew

Advanced Member
59 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No need for that to be mentioned every time when it has been reported many times already that those entities are also being investigated in these cases.

You are correct. The unmentionable bit has previously been mentioned, so there's no need to mention it again.

47 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

It's far from inevitable that they will be jailed then deported and blacklisted.

You are correct. They may have the considerable fiscal fortitude that's required to vanish in plain sight.

Liverpool Lou Star Member

Liverpool Lou

Advanced Member
31 minutes ago, KhunHeineken said:
47 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

It's far from inevitable that they will be jailed then deported and blacklisted.

I've posted the laws for you previously

No you haven't. You haven't posted anything that states that those convicted of using illegal nominee companies will be jailed, deported and blacklisted.

NanLaew Star Member

NanLaew

Advanced Member
25 minutes ago, norsurin said:

Also hope the people he scammed will find him one day and really let him pay them back the hard way.

Can you expand on that obscurely threatening hope you have?

Liverpool Lou Star Member

Liverpool Lou

Advanced Member
Just now, NanLaew said:

It's far from inevitable that they will be jailed then deported and blacklisted.

You are correct. They may have the considerable fiscal fortitude that's required to vanish in plain sight

...or they may simply be fined and told to dispose of the property and not have to vanish at all regardless of their unassailable pecuniary resilience.

L- Lifeline Silver Member

L- Lifeline

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No need for that to be mentioned every time when it has been reported many times already that those entities are also being investigated in these cases.

I agree- and I suspect that the prosecuting authorities will go for the low hanging fruit first

So it will be easy to show that the nominees are indeed nominees- and thus secure a conviction against the foreign national

Once they have the conviction against the foreign national the authorities can then go to the professional adviser responsible for what will have already been judicially determined as being an illegal scheme in the first place - this leaving the professional responsible with very little room to wriggle - similar to the CPS in the UK securing an Unexplained Wealth Order conviction against an individual before then going after the lawyer who advised said individual

ChipButty Star Member

ChipButty

Advanced Member

I always thought something like this could happen one day, If it all went tit's up and they just confiscate everything a Farang owns, shut down your bank accounts, then ship you on the next plane with nothing, And give everything back to Thai's, A bit like Idi Amin all them years ago in Uganda, Like a few other places in Africa,

msbkk Gold Member

msbkk

Advanced Member
(edited)
7 minutes ago, ChipButty said:

I always thought something like this could happen one day, If it all went tit's up and they just confiscate everything a Farang owns, shut down your bank accounts, then ship you on the next plane with nothing, And give everything back to Thai's, A bit like Idi Amin all them years ago in Uganda, Like a few other places in Africa,

That is a bit of an overstatement. In these cases the investments were done in a well known grey zone against the law but promoted by so called lawyers. If a foreigner really legally owns something (for example a condo) there is nothing to fear.

Last year I was offered a nice house at the beach in a company name. I decided not to invest because problem of land ownership is well known. But I am owner of a condo with the title in my own name.

Edited by msbkk

cynic1 Silver Member

cynic1

Advanced Member

In the photo at the beginning in the editorial section, it has a photo of what appears to be a senior immigration officer in a black shirt, shaking hands to a man, which I believe the photo is the Frenchman with nominee legal issues, and the man being the immigration officer.

Yet both are smiling to each other like we can fix this little problem!. Isn't that suspicious?

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
(edited)
2 hours ago, L- Lifeline said:

Once they have the conviction against the foreign national the authorities can then go to the professional adviser responsible for what will have already been judicially determined as being an illegal scheme in the first place -

The statute of limitations for those ancillary to the nominee structure for many charges would (likely) be 10 years.

It seems many (not all) of these large scale operations are older than that.

Edited by JerryM

Sigmund Gold Member

Sigmund

Advanced Member

How about using all the manpower to hunt down all the drug mafia ? Oh but sorry...they are mainly locals...

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.