Jump to content

Senior officer was ‘mastermind’ in Yingluck escape, says deputy police chief


webfact

Recommended Posts

Senior officer was ‘mastermind’ in Yingluck escape, says deputy police chief

By THE NATION 

 

1c6d5df344d430939c3fa4749a144e1f-1.jpg

 

A SENIOR POLICE officer has been implicated for allegedly enabling the flight of former prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra, deputy national police chief Pol General Srivara Ransibrahmanakul said yesterday.


Srivara said the police had information that the officer was a “mastermind” in the case. Yingluck’s flight, he said, could not have been carried out without a mastermind.

 

Police are waiting for the results of DNA tests, expected tomorrow, before extending their investigations, he said.

 

If the DNA traces found in the Toyota Camry belong to Yingluck, her driver – Pol Colonel Chairit Anurit of the Metropolitan Police – would also be charged with dereliction of duty under Article 157, Srivara said. Chairit has already been charged with possessing fake licence plates found in the vehicle and has been the subject of a disciplinary probe.

 

On August 23, Yingluck fled in the vehicle to Sa Kaew province, where she reportedly crossed the border. She was subsequently found to have reached Dubai, which she later left to travel to the United Kingdom. 

 

She did not attend the scheduled August 25 reading of the Supreme Court verdict in the case against her relating to her government’s rice-pledging scheme. The verdict, which was finally read on September 27, found her guilty on some charges and she was jailed in absentia for five years without suspension.

 

Srivara said he has filed a complaint with the Immigration Bureau against Yingluck for violation of the immigration law.

Under the law, an arrest warrant would be issued next.

 

He also said he has expedited a complaint filed to Interpol, asking for a “red notice” – effectively an international arrest warrant – to be issued against Yingluck.

 

The Royal Thai Police’s Foreign Affairs Division has informed him that a “blue notice” must be issued first. This would ask Interpol members to help locate, identify or obtain information about Yingluck and her whereabouts. 

 

Srivara said Yingluck was already a convict, and he believed that her case was not political, but about corruption, so she should be subject to a red notice.

 

Srivara said Thai police had contacted their counterparts in the UK and were waiting to hear back. 

 

The United Arab Emirates had notified Thai authorities that Yingluck had left Dubai for the UK on September 11, he said.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/politics/30328482

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-10-05
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, webfact said:

Police are waiting for the results of DNA tests, expected tomorrow, before extending their investigations, he said.

When was the DNA sent off? Thought that could be done here in 1-2 days. Up there with the US in being the best at testing DNA. But the poor Americans are still trying to work out how to question the DNA on where it was at the time and where it was going. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does rather sound as if there is a lot of jockeying for position going on in the higher echelons of the police.

 

Perhaps they wish to be in the right team when a "night of the long knives" occurs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, klauskunkel said:

There is no shortage of masterminds in Thailand. That's why it's number one in the world. In everything.

Especially at assisted escapes for asylum seekers. They even masterminded the escape of genocidist Pol Pot from Cambodia when he had to get out of town quick. Thai agents entered that country and assisted him in fleeing to save his worthless skin so he could live out his life in comfortable retirement in southern Thailand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you or Thai people in Thailand thinking about what happened if  Yingluck Shinawatra go to jail ?? (War in Thailand??) fore me she can take the 4 year`s and finish whit that, if she still live after 4 year in jail in Thailand.And a think the Government asked her to travel out from Thailand so it's calm in Thailand before the election in 20?? or 25??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, nasa123 said:

What you or Thai people in Thailand thinking about what happened if  Yingluck Shinawatra go to jail ?? (War in Thailand??) fore me she can take the 4 year`s and finish whit that, if she still live after 4 year in jail in Thailand.And a think the Government asked her to travel out from Thailand so it's calm in Thailand before the election in 20?? or 25??

I don't think that would cause civil war in Thailand. Of course the reds and ptp would try to incinerate - but to no avail or at leased short lived only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sweatalot said:

Senior police officer  working secretely for thaksin

- no surprise

 

A lot of them don't usually bother with the secrecy bit!

 

Remember the guy with a photo of Thaksin, dressed in a smart dressing gown, pinning his new rank on in HK? The same guy who got caught with a gun and amo in his carry on bag in Japan? The Junta didn't throw him under the bus. Ever wondered why?

 

It's never black or white here only shades of grey which can change shade at will!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, AGareth2 said:

except she was not found guilty of corruption

That's right. 

They tried and tried ,but could not find a single instance of corruption to bring her down. 

The best they can come up with is she is guilty that she was informed of the corruption of others. 

Whatever internationally accepted law that comes under ????

In fact her finances actually went down during her administration. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, greenchair said:

That's right. 

They tried and tried ,but could not find a single instance of corruption to bring her down. 

The best they can come up with is she is guilty that she was informed of the corruption of others. 

Whatever internationally accepted law that comes under ????

In fact her finances actually went down during her administration. 

 

Its just criminal negligence.. just as she has been tried for.. Nothing special. Its been proven she knew about the corruption and it would have been her job to stop it. She did not do so costing the state an 30 billion that is criminal negligence. I know it does not suit your world view but its a criminal act non the less. 

 

Yl has been notified about the fake rice deals.. she took action by removing her minister (Boonsong the one that went to jail). By doing so she acknowledged knowledge of the fake G2G trades. But she failed to cancel the trades. I am sure that it had nothing to do that rice traders connected to her brother were benefiting.. im sure that was just coincidental.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, robblok said:

Its just criminal negligence.. just as she has been tried for.. Nothing special. Its been proven she knew about the corruption and it would have been her job to stop it. She did not do so costing the state an 30 billion that is criminal negligence. I know it does not suit your world view but its a criminal act non the less. 

 

Yl has been notified about the fake rice deals.. she took action by removing her minister (Boonsong the one that went to jail). By doing so she acknowledged knowledge of the fake G2G trades. But she failed to cancel the trades. I am sure that it had nothing to do that rice traders connected to her brother were benefiting.. im sure that was just coincidental.  

very coincidental ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AGareth2 said:

that was an assumption

was it not?

No it was proven in court.. so no assumption. That is the basis of the court case. Its also total logical. I am sorry that it conflicts with your views of her innocence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Baerboxer said:

 

A lot of them don't usually bother with the secrecy bit!

 

Remember the guy with a photo of Thaksin, dressed in a smart dressing gown, pinning his new rank on in HK? The same guy who got caught with a gun and amo in his carry on bag in Japan? The Junta didn't throw him under the bus. Ever wondered why?

 

It's never black or white here only shades of grey which can change shade at will!

Wasn't 'the guy' you write about the chief of the metropolitan police? Isn't that kind of a 'senior officer'...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, robblok said:

No it was proven in court.. so no assumption. That is the basis of the court case. Its also total logical. I am sorry that it conflicts with your views of her innocence. 

documents

memos

emails

what evidence

no no no

The way i see it is that they had a verdict

and then worked backwards

remember there was a dissenting Judge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AGareth2 said:

documents

memos

emails

what evidence

no no no

The way i see it is that they had a verdict

and then worked backwards

remember there was a dissenting Judge

 

Have you read the full verdict report and been privy to all the supporting evidence?

 

Perhaps you'd care to offer an explanation on why she didn't cancel the fraudulent deals and instigate a criminal investigation into the whole affair rather than just sack someone? 

 

And perhaps explain how never attending any meetings, especially in light of the above, that you appointed yourself to chair, wasn't negligent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Baerboxer said:

 

Have you read the full verdict report and been privy to all the supporting evidence?

 

Perhaps you'd care to offer an explanation on why she didn't cancel the fraudulent deals and instigate a criminal investigation into the whole affair rather than just sack someone? 

 

And perhaps explain how never attending any meetings, especially in light of the above, that you appointed yourself to chair, wasn't negligent?

and why did one Judge have a different opinion to the other 8?

not sure it is as clear cut as you say

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, AGareth2 said:

and why did one Judge have a different opinion to the other 8?

not sure it is as clear cut as you say

Thaksin could only buy one not 8 :sorry:

 

It was a clear cut case.. everyone knew this before we all knew about the fake G2G deals way back when they were in the news. Now it has just been proven in a court of law. She did nothing.. (probably intentional because her brothers minions benefited but that is something we cant prove, but it is proven she did nothing and knew about the fake G2G deals). You can argue all you want but it was a fair case, they did not put the rice program on trial.. just her negligence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...