CU advances to 308th in world university rankings, Thailand told more research needed at universities

[webfact]

CU advances to 308th in world university rankings, Thailand told more research needed at universities

By The Nation

 

 

Chulalongkorn University (CU) has ranked among the world’s 500 best universities, according to the latest ranking.

 

It is the only Thai higher-educational institute to make it to the top half of the Centre for World University Rankings (CUWR) 2017 list, which came out yesterday and identified the world’s top 1,000 universities. 

 

In the latest list, the CU sits at the 308th spot – up from 320th a year earlier. 

 

Two other Thai universities on the CUWR 2017 list are Mahidol University (MU) and Chiang Mai University (CMU). 

 

MU has also risen up the list this year, placing 518th – up from 522nd last year. 

 

But CMU has fallen down the ranking, from 808th last year to 846th this year. 

 

“The performance of Thailand’s representatives in the top 1000 in 2017 is generally similar to last year,” said Dr Nadim Mahassen, president of the CUWR. “Further funding should be invested in research if the country aspires to increase its competitiveness on the global stage.” 

 

CUWR is the publisher of the largest academic ranking of global universities.

 

For the 2017 edition of the rankings, 27,770 degree-granting institutions of higher education worldwide were evaluated, among which the top 1000 research-intensive institutions received rankings based on eight objective indicators covering education, alumni employment, and research.

 

Leading the list is the prestigious Harvard University from the United States (US). Coming next are Stanford University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, both from the US as well.

 

But the fourth and the fifth ranked are from the United Kingdom. They are the University of Cambridge and the University of Oxford respectively. 

 

This year, 61 countries – more than ever before – feature in the top 1000 list, which represents the top 3.7 per cent of degree-granting institutions of higher education globally.

 

“The US remains the dominant force in higher education worldwide, claiming the top three spots, eight of the top 10, and 54 of the top 100. It leads with 225 universities represented in the top 1000, followed by China (97), Japan (71), the UK (65), and Germany (57),” Mahassen said.

 

The best-performing Asian university on the list is the University of Tokyo, which ranks 13th. 

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30329492

 

-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-10-17

[canopus1969]

If I were that low down on the tables I would keep quiet and hide !

[wakeupplease]

Well that says it all and they have only got themselves to blame for it, while other countries move forward, this lot stand still playing with coups all of the time.

[Bob12345]

More research needed?

 

Time to google and copy/paste other people's work to earn some extra PhDs and go up in rankings.

[Lupatria]

3 hours ago, canopus1969 said:

If I were that low down on the tables I would keep quiet and hide !

308 -That's a place I would have expected from the Afghan Women's Soccer League in an UEFA ranking

[yellowboat]

There are 307 better universities to choose from.

[BEVUP]

Is this their best or do we have better in BBK

[NeoDinosaw]

4 hours ago, canopus1969 said:

If I were that low down on the tables I would keep quiet and hide !

308 out of  27,770  seems pretty high rank to me.

 

Where are you from ?  what is the ranking of your local university ?

[chippendale]

20 minutes ago, NeoDinosaw said:

308 out of  27,770  seems pretty high rank to me.

 

Where are you from ?  what is the ranking of your local university ?

Top 40.

 

#308 is mediocre, pitiful.

[alien365]

My wife would love to do more meaningful research but the equipment and machinery here is outdated. The only chance to do anything meaningful is when we go back to the UK and she uses some of the facilities there

[alex8912]

So it seems only The Nation thinks the Center for World University Rankings = CUWR?? Lol 

Which University on the list did the writer go to? 27,771 perhaps. 

[Briggsy]

This is like a student just prepping and being tutored to get the grade to get the piece of paper.

 

The focus should be on the research the university does and the subsequent effects on society and the workplace.

 

Focusing on these silly and very subjective league tables is putting the cart before the horse.

[Ossy]

15 hours ago, webfact said:

CU advances to 308th in world university rankings, Thailand told more research needed at universities

 

14 minutes ago, alex8912 said:

So it seems only The Nation thinks the Center for World University Rankings = CUWR?? Lol 

Which University on the list did the writer go to? 27,771 perhaps. 

Well spotted but, for the umpteenth time, stop calling me Lol

[Ossy]

16 hours ago, webfact said:

“The performance of Thailand’s representatives in the top 1000 in 2017 is generally similar to last year,” said Dr Nadim Mahassen, president of the CUWR. “Further funding should be invested in research if the country aspires to increase its competitiveness on the global stage.” 

Further Funding Invested in Research - or RIFF in 'The Nation' speak - Just 4 simple words that tell most if not the whole story, closely followed by a root & branch cleanout of dead wood, cliques and cronyism that, I suspect, will be rife amongst the ageing 'educated' who will hardly know what good further education resembles. And, if the Junta's the tiddliest bit interested, less SUBs = more TUDs . . . simple, if their was a working brain amongst them

[amvet]

9 hours ago, chippendale said:

Top 40.

 

#308 is mediocre, pitiful.

#22 in the World.  Now everybody stand up for the School Song

 

[Ossy]

46 minutes ago, Briggsy said:

This is like a student just prepping and being tutored to get the grade to get the piece of paper.

 

The focus should be on the research the university does and the subsequent effects on society and the workplace.

 

Focusing on these silly and very subjective league tables is putting the cart before the horse.

Hardly subjective in my view, when it can safely be assumed they are based on degree-achievement stats.

Edited October 18, 2017 by Ossy
Message clarity

[canopus1969]

11 hours ago, NeoDinosaw said:

308 out of  27,770  seems pretty high rank to me.

 

Where are you from ?  what is the ranking of your local university ?

Oxford - and First of course  - next question 

[mikebell]

Thai Universities/Colleges are mere money making mechanisms. Nobody fails; all are welcome so long as parents can afford the fees irrespective of academic abilities; at the end of the course, worthless scraps of paper are issued  and real learning can begin as the scrabble for jobs ensues. Here again money talks.

[Ossy]

43 minutes ago, canopus1969 said:

Oxford - and First of course  - next question 

Huh! . . . not according to the CWUR list http://cwur.org/2017.php That clearly gives Oxford 2nd place.

Edited October 18, 2017 by Ossy
omission

[Orton Rd]

CU- barely a Polytechnic in the real world, but the height of academia in Thailand.

[newcomer71]

According to the The Times Higher Education World University Rankings, results seems a bit different...

Edited October 18, 2017 by newcomer71

[canopus1969]

20 minutes ago, Ossy said:

Huh! . . . not according to the CWUR list http://cwur.org/2017.php That clearly gives Oxford 2nd place.

I think one should believe a more creditable source  :   https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2017/world-ranking#survey-answer 

[billzant]

Amusing to see Oxford and Cambridge  1and 2 from Times Higher Ed. CWUR based in Dubai not quite the same http://cwur.org/about.php

[Ossy]

3 hours ago, canopus1969 said:

I think one should believe a more creditable source  :   https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2017/world-ranking#survey-answer 

Since the forum stemmed from a piece by The Nation, wholly based on the CWUR table, I believe my source more relevant than one that you might rate more highly. If you'd stated your preferred source of ranking in the first place, it would have helped. We're all getting so used to misinformation from the top dogs that it's little wonder we stoop to deploying it ourselves . . . not me, of course

[canopus1969]

1 hour ago, Ossy said:

Since the forum stemmed from a piece by The Nation, wholly based on the CWUR table, I believe my source more relevant than one that you might rate more highly. If you'd stated your preferred source of ranking in the first place, it would have helped. We're all getting so used to misinformation from the top dogs that it's little wonder we stoop to deploying it ourselves . . . not me, of course

As I posted, the source I mentioned has a higher credibility - do check it yourself

[Ossy]

6 hours ago, Ossy said:

7 hours ago, canopus1969 said:

Oxford - and First of course  - next question 

Huh! . . . not according to the CWUR list http://cwur.org/2017.php That clearly gives Oxford 2nd place.

The issue re credibility of ratings was entirely of your own making. My initial challenge, re the correctness of your 'Oxford First' assertion was entirely sound, since at that point, the only ratings table 'on the table' was the CWUR one. OK - according to the Times HE ratings, your OU might have outscored CU . . . I don't have a problem with that, as you appear to have in accepting the vagueness of your unaccredited initial claim.

Unless you wish to be argumentative rather than reasonable, I don't expect to hear from you again.

[canopus1969]

50 minutes ago, Ossy said:

The issue re credibility of ratings was entirely of your own making. My initial challenge, re the correctness of your 'Oxford First' assertion was entirely sound, since at that point, the only ratings table 'on the table' was the CWUR one. OK - according to the Times HE ratings, your OU might have outscored CU . . . I don't have a problem with that, as you appear to have in accepting the vagueness of your unaccredited initial claim.

Unless you wish to be argumentative rather than reasonable, I don't expect to hear from you again.

As you have just said the Times list is more credible - which was my point nin the first place 

[OldSiamHand]

7 hours ago, canopus1969 said:

I think one should believe a more creditable source  :   https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2017/world-ranking#survey-answer 

What makes the times survey more "creditable" (or do you mean credible?).

[wakeupplease]

308th place

 

Explains why things are what they are here with the other top local uni's way down the list of education, except for the boys in green who are even further down but running a country

 

Expect no changes in the distant future as the dumb get dumber.

[canopus1969]

13 hours ago, OldSiamHand said:

What makes the times survey more "creditable" (or do you mean credible?).

Apologies - credible