Jump to content

‘Zero-dollar’ tourist operator nabbed over ID theft


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

‘Zero-dollar’ tourist operator nabbed over ID theft

By Kornkamon Aksorndech 
The Nation

 

989a4a5e81bf6832b2c2d364e1c06be8.jpeg

 

A female company executive has been arrested over allegations that she is a Chinese national who assumed a Thai citizen’s identity to work for a “zero-dollar” tour business network.

 

Tourist Police acting deputy commissioner Pol Maj-General Surachet Hakpal told a press conference on Wednesday that the woman supplied the network with Chinese tourists in exchange for a payment of Bt300 each. 

 

A zero-dollar tour is one where the customer does not pay a fee but is taken to shops and persuaded to buy goods at inflated prices. 

 

The suspect in this case denied the identity theft accusation but admitted that she used to supply tourists to three companies under a zero-dollar tour business network. They said she had closed her business after the recent police crackdown on such operations.

 

Thai Tongmong International Travel Group executive Siripat Mane, 43, was nabbed in Khan Na Yow district in Bangkok on Tuesday morning following public complaints about suspected Thai identity theft.

 

Surachet said a police investigation found that she had submitted an application for a Thai ID card on September 10, 2002 in Phop Phra district in Tak under the name of a hill tribe woman, Nakham Manae. The information regarding year of birth was changed from BE2507 to BE2517 (1964 to 1974), Surachet said.

 

In 2003, she changed the name to “Siripat” in Bangkok. After this, she made several changes regarding household data, Surachet said.

 

The paper trail eventually led police to seek an arrest warrant for her on November 18. She faces charges of applying for a Thai ID card without having Thai nationality by presenting fraudulent evidence to officials.

 

Provincial Police Region 6 chief Pol Maj-General Chaiwat Chantharaworalak said police would ask the Interior Ministry to cancel Siripat’s Thai ID card. They would also contact the Commerce Ministry to cancel the licence for her company in Rama IX area and ask the Tourism Department to cancel her tour business licence.

 

Chaiwat said police couldn’t proceed with legal action against a district clerk involved in Siripat’s alleged identity theft as the statute of limitations on this offence had expired. Also no disciplinary action could be taken as the district clerk in question had already been fired and was serving time in jail for separate offences.

 

The damaged person, Nakham Manae or Kham Oh-sang, 51, bought a vase of flowers to thank police during the press conference. 

 

Surachet said police investigations into ID card information thieves linked to the tourism businesses had led to the arrest of about 50 people so far.

 

In two or three days, police would file charges against two Nakhon Sawan-based officials for alleged involvement in unrelated Thai ID card information theft cases, Surachet said.

 

Surachet also revealed that, although the heavy crackdown on “zero-dollar” tour businesses had meant Thailand was currently free from them, the network of people involved had reportedly moved on to another business. He claimed they were buying condominium units without paying full taxes in order to operate as accommodation businesses catering for foreign tourists.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/breakingnews/30332267

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-11-22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

Chaiwat said police couldn’t proceed with legal action against a district clerk involved in Siripat’s alleged identity theft as the statute of limitations on this offence had expired.

"as the statute of limitations on this offence had expired."

That's interesting I didn't Know that they had a sunset clause in affect in Thailand law --Anyone know where you can look up what offenses expire after what dates etc.....

.

I am asking for a friend......:wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Stargrazer9889 said:

Jail time, lots of it for her to have time to think lots of things over.

Geezer

Really Geezer....how many 100s of years do you feel she should get for committing this absolutely heinous offense ---such a pity they have done away with the flogging as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, sanuk711 said:

Really Geezer....how many 100s of years do you feel she should get for committing this absolutely heinous offense ---such a pity they have done away with the flogging as well.

I am afraid you have no idea, at all, what it means if your identity is taken away from you, don't you.

The repercussions are very intimidating, because you don't exist any more.

Flogging, yes identity stealers should be flogged, put in prison for a very long time and all the assets should be confiscated and given to the victim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Thai friend got a huge tax-bill suddenly, when he called them they found out that a Thai company (famous one) had used his ID and he had to pay the tax, no matter if or what or when.

 

He then contacted that company, made an appointment to talk about it and they offered to pay his extra tax for him.

 

He couldn't do anything else like going to the police or so, the tax-department told him this was the only way to deal with it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hansnl said:

I am afraid you have no idea, at all, what it means if your identity is taken away from you, don't you.

Assumptions....they do abound on this site don't they?

As a Family yes twice...wife adult daughter once New Zealand then  Australia.

 

1 hour ago, hansnl said:

Flogging, yes identity stealers should be flogged, put in prison for a very long time and all the assets should be confiscated and given to the victim

May I return an assumption that you have neither been flogged or thrown into a Thai prison--to make statements so silly.

 

The real culprit in this story walks away (rich) and free " No charges against the district clerk involved".....does anyone think it was the first time he had done this..........or is that an assumption on my part.?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...