Jump to content

Attorney-general to decide on case against protesters


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Attorney-general to decide on case against protesters

By THE SUNDAY NATION

 

a3cfbe0d9cc606172d275af662302af0.jpeg

 

The Attorney-General will have the final say in confirming an order by a senior public prosecutor not to pursue a case against 24 pro-election protesters, his office said yesterday.

 

Prayuth Phetkhun, deputy spokesman for the Office of the Attorney-General, said that according to the relevant law governing the agency, decisions by prosecutors not to pursue cases on such grounds need to be forwarded to the attorney-general for a final decision.

 

“If the attorney-general agrees with the decision, the order by the prosecutor is then confirmed,” he said.

 

The prosecutor in charge of the case, Kirkkiat Rathnawatham, made his decision on Friday not to indict the 24 protesters on grounds that legal action against them would not benefit the public, although they were found to have violated laws.

The protesters had been charged with violating the junta ban on political gatherings of five or more people and the Public Assembly Act.

 

They took part in a rally earlier this year at the Pathum Wan intersection, when they called for an election to be held within this year and accused the ruling National Council for Peace and Order of attempting to stay on in power.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/politics/30340658

 

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-03-11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, rooster59 said:

on grounds that legal action against them would not benefit the public, although they were found to have violated laws.

what he is in effect saying is that these particular laws do not benefit the public, although he is right, not really the job of a prosecutor

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Srikcir said:

There it is - the "good intentions vs the law."

To be exercised arbitrarily according to no standard other than some inexplicable and unwritten moral code(s).

Prayut insists that the rule of law must be obeyed for a stable and peaceful society. Yet, the Prayut regime constantly reminds Thais that at a moment's notice that the application of the rule of law depends on a capricious and sometimes maybe whimsical attitude of Thailand's elite establishment.

Frankly, it would better serve the protests that the protesters be prosecuted.

 

'Would not benefit the public'  jailing of mushroom pickers, peaceful protesters and people who 'like' FB posts is all in the 'public's interest' of course!   what Vipers!  problem is they actually believe it.

images (2).jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...