Jump to content








U.S. concerned by 'destabilising and malign activities' of Iran - Pompeo


webfact

Recommended Posts

U.S. concerned by 'destabilising and malign activities' of Iran - Pompeo

By Lesley Wroughton and Ori Lewis

 

2018-04-29T114659Z_1_LYNXMPEE3S07C_RTROPTP_4_MIDEAST-USA-POMPEO.JPG

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo shakes hands with his Saudi counterpart Adel al-Jubeir during a news conference, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia April 29, 2018. REUTERS/Faisal Al Nasser

 

TEL AVIV (Reuters) - The United States is deeply concerned by Iran's "destabilising and malign activities", new Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said after meeting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday.

 

The former CIA director was speaking on a flying visit to the region, where he had earlier in the day met with Saudi King Salman in Riyadh and stressed the need for unity among Gulf allies as Washington aims to muster support for new sanctions against Iran to curb its missile program.

 

The whirlwind trip to NATO in Brussels and to Middle East allies came only hours after Pompeo was confirmed as Trump's top diplomat. He has not even visited his own office yet, he told Netanyahu.

 

Speaking alongside the Israeli leader, Pompeo said in Tel Aviv: "We remain deeply concerned about Iran's dangerous escalation of threats towards Israel and the region."

 

He added: "Strong cooperation with close allies like (Israel) is critical to our efforts to counter Iran's destabilising and malign activities through the Middle East, and indeed, throughout the world."

 

Pompeo also said that the relocation of the American embassy to Jerusalem, a move set to take place on May 14, was "recognising (the) reality" of "Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and the seat of its government."

 

Netanyahu, who called Pompeo a "true friend of Israel, echoed the Secretary's focus on Iran, stressing the closeness of U.S. and Israeli cooperation on the issue.

 

"I think the greatest threat to the world and to our two countries, and to all countries, is the marriage of militant Islam with nuclear weapons, and specifically the attempt of Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. We have had a very productive talk today on this subject," he said.

 

In contrast to his fierce opposition to the Obama administration's negotiations with Iran to reach a nuclear deal in 2015, which he called a "historic mistake", Netanyahu said Israel was willing to support U.S. President Donald Trump's efforts to strengthen the 2015 agreement.

 

"Iran must be stopped. Its quest for nuclear bombs must be stopped. Its aggression must be stopped, and we're committed to stopping it together," he said.

 

In Saudi Arabia earlier, Pompeo said that the U.S. would abandon the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, reached under President Donald Trump's predecessor, unless talks with European partners yield improvements to ensure the Islamic Republic never possesses nuclear weapons.

 

"Iran destabilises this entire region. It supports proxy militias and terrorist groups. It is an arms dealer to the Houthi rebels in Yemen. It supports the murderous Assad regime (in Syria) as well," he said in joint remarks with Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir.

 

"Gulf unity is necessary and we need to achieve it."

 

Pompeo also addressed the rift between Qatar and its neighbours, telling reporters after leaving Riyadh: "We are hopeful that they will, in their own way, figure out how to remove the dispute between them."

 

Saudi Arabia, along with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Egypt, cut off travel and trade ties with Qatar last June, accusing it of supporting terrorism and Iran.

 

Doha has denied the accusations and has said its three fellow Gulf countries aim to curtail its sovereignty. Iran denies supporting terrorism or having sought to develop nuclear weapons.

 

The United States, which has military bases in both Qatar and some of the countries lined up against it, is trying to mediate the Qatar feud. Trump publicly sided with the Saudis and Emiratis early in the crisis, but is now pushing for a resolution to maintain a united front against Iran.

 

Yemen's armed Iranian-aligned Houthi movement has fired over 100 missiles into Saudi Arabia, the latest salvo killing a man on Saturday in the southern Saudi province of Jizan.

 

The United States and the Saudi-led coalition that intervened in Yemen's civil war in 2015 accuse Iran of providing the missiles to its Houthi allies, which Tehran denies.

 

NUCLEAR DEAL

Pompeo's trip comes as Trump considers whether or not to abandon a self-imposed May 12 deadline for the Iran nuclear deal he sees as deeply flawed.

 

He has called on Gulf allies to contribute funding and troops to stabilise areas in Iraq and Syria where a U.S.-led coalition has largely defeated Islamic State jihadists.

 

Earlier this month, Jubeir said Saudi Arabia would be prepared to send troops into Syria under the U.S.-led coalition if a decision is taken to widen it.

 

Asked about Saudi troops on the ground in Syria, Pompeo said: "We will sit down and talk about... how to best make sure that this is not America alone working on this, it's the Gulf states working alongside us."

 

On Wednesday, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani waved aside U.S. and European talks over changes to the nuclear accord and dismissed Trump as a "tradesman" who lacked the qualifications to deal with a complex international pact.

 

"We've certainly made some (progress with the Europeans)," Pompeo said on Sunday. "There is still work to do," he said, adding that Saudi leaders told him they would support any fixes to the agreement.

 

Britain said on Sunday that it, France and Germany - the other signatories to the 2015 Iran deal along with Russia, China and the European Union - agreed that the accord was the best way to prevent Tehran from gaining nuclear weapons.

 

Macron and Rouhani spoke by telephone on Sunday and agreed to work together in the coming weeks to preserve the 2015 agreement, the Elysee said in a statement.

 

"(We) committed to continue working closely together and with the U.S. on how to tackle the range of challenges that Iran poses – including those issues that a new deal might cover," a statement from British Prime Minister Theresa May's office said.

 

The 2015 agreement limited Iran's enrichment of uranium for nuclear fuel to help ensure it could not be turned to developing bomb material, and Tehran secured a removal of most international sanctions in return.

 

Iran has repeatedly said its ballistic missile programme has nothing to do with its nuclear work and is non-negotiable.

 

(Reporting by Lesley Wroughton and Ori Lewis; Additional reporting by Sarah Dadouch in Riyadh and Andrew MacAskill in London; Editing by Mark Heinrich and Stephen Kalin)

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-04-30
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


53 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:

I don't think they're concerned with the destabilization in the region at all. I think they're concerned that the wrong team is winning.

As long as Iran is muzzled and kept at check, this is what the world should be concern about because Iran want to rule the middle east with nukes, and there is no price too high that Iran are not be willing to pay fo it...

Edited by ezzra
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mikebike said:

Possibly Pompeo is concerned with bringing about the rapture so he and his fellow evangelicals can float to heaven whilst the world burns and everyone dies...

No, that's not it. The US is happy the region is destabilized. It is what we and our proxies set out to do. It's just that they are not in a position to take advantage of the instability later because we are losing. Still, we're making nice bank on the weapons we're selling, so we got that going for us.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:

No, that's not it. The US is happy the region is destabilized. It is what we and our proxies set out to do. It's just that they are not in a position to take advantage of the instability later because we are losing. Still, we're making nice bank on the weapons we're selling, so we got that going for us.

Maybe... maybe not...

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lannarebirth said:

I don't think they're concerned with the destabilization in the region at all. I think they're concerned that the wrong team is winning.

I'm far more worried about the activities of USA's main ally than the USA itself.  Sooner or later Iran or Russia or maybe both will hit back hard. Last night there was a huge strike by Israel with initial reports of mass injuries and perhaps casualties.  Reporters on the ground located at the Hama National Hospital show, "civilians are donating blood for the Soldiers & Civilians who were wounded by the Israeli Israel Air Strikes tonight."

 

Quote


“The airstrikes will continue,” said Mr Makki, “a lot of people thought the strikes on the T4 base was a response to the chemical attack, but it wasn’t.”

He added: “Israel are terrified of Iran installing air defences to protect their bases.

“The Israelis will continue striking these different targets and there are between 20-25 targets to choose from so it will play out considerably.

 

 

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/952380/Syria-news-war-Iran-Israel-USA-UK-France-Donald-Trump-Danny-Makki

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, midas said:

I'm far more worried about the activities of USA's main ally than the USA itself.  Sooner or later Iran or Russia or maybe both will hit back hard. Last night there was a huge strike by Israel with initial reports of mass injuries and perhaps casualties.  Reporters on the ground located at the Hama National Hospital show, "civilians are donating blood for the Soldiers & Civilians who were wounded by the Israeli Israel Air Strikes tonight."

 

 

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/952380/Syria-news-war-Iran-Israel-USA-UK-France-Donald-Trump-Danny-Makki

 

As long as the ayatollahs are in power I'm not going to knock Israel for taking their shots. But it should be targeted at the leadership IMO.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:

 

Wouldn't someone looking forward to The Rapture be less concerned that Iran's ayatollahs might get nuclear weapons?

No. The exact opposite.

 

In simple terms:

For the rapture to unfold, evangelicals believe that ALL the worlds jewish people must "return" to Israel. This is much more likely, in their minds, IF Israel has complete dominance in the region.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mikebike said:

No. The exact opposite.

 

In simple terms:

For the rapture to unfold, evangelicals believe that ALL the worlds jewish people must "return" to Israel. This is much more likely, in their minds, IF Israel has complete dominance in the region.

How big of a region? They already have complete dominance in their region.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lannarebirth said:

Wouldn't someone looking forward to The Rapture be less concerned that Iran's ayatollahs might get nuclear weapons?

The way I understood is that these religious christian nutters want Jews to rule Jerusalem which will then trigger Jesus's second coming and the rapture. 

 

Religious people should never be given power of any kind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, oilinki said:

The way I understood is that these religious christian nutters want Jews to rule Jerusalem which will then trigger Jesus's second coming and the rapture. 

 

Religious people should never be given power of any kind. 

Agreed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jenny2017 said:

When do they understand that the times of the "World Police" are over?

 

No there not. Only those 'on duty" change. There will always be a world police. But the US is waning. And the replacements might not be so interested in democracy, freedoms and human rights. 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Iran is ditching the USD for oil exports . They will report it in euro and other currencies like the Yuan . Sadam , Ghadaffi come to mind.

So the "distabilising and malign activities"  , is to be seen broader than their influence in the region.

If Kim is serious about denuclearizing Korea .... he can sell his nukes for a nice profit to Iran. They are going to need it.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BuaBS said:

And Iran is ditching the USD for oil exports . They will report it in euro and other currencies like the Yuan . Sadam , Ghadaffi come to mind.

So the "distabilising and malign activities"  , is to be seen broader than their influence in the region.

If Kim is serious about denuclearizing Korea .... he can sell his nukes for a nice profit to Iran. They are going to need it.

Kim ain't dim. He will take the lesson of Iran and Iraq and be 45's worst nightmare at the negotiating table.

 

You think he will sell out? Not a hope in hell. He will take the lessons of his dad and grandpa and make 45 look like a ... let's say TWIT, with the "I" replaced with an "A".

Edited by mikebike
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, mikebike said:

Kim ain't dim. He will take the lesson of Iran and Iraq and be 45's worst nightmare at the negotiating table.

 

You think he will sell out? Not a hope in hell. He will take the lessons of his dad and grandpa and make 45 look like a ... let's say TWIT, with the "I" replaced with an "A".

It's hard to say what Kim is going to do . Selling some knowhow or parts to Iran would be a good money maker or get oil from Iran that maybe come under sanctions again if the nuclear deal is terminated by Trump.

Iran is going to need help against 2 nuclear powers , and I don't think help is going to come from Russia.

Like one poster already said : Iranian targets in Syria were hit last night .... Putin is taking a very long time to get the S 300 to Syria , I doubt he's going to protect Iran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BuaBS said:

It's hard to say what Kim is going to do . Selling some knowhow or parts to Iran would be a good money maker or get oil from Iran that maybe come under sanctions again if the nuclear deal is terminated by Trump.

Iran is going to need help against 2 nuclear powers , and I don't think help is going to come from Russia.

Like one poster already said : Iranian targets in Syria were hit last night .... Putin is taking a very long time to get the S 300 to Syria , I doubt he's going to protect Iran.

Kim will get all the oil/energy he needs from China. 

 

Iran has done very well against "2 nuclear powers" thus far.

 

Iran is not looking for Putin's help, 45 is.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, lannarebirth said:

How big of a region? They already have complete dominance in their region.

Really? The Israelis got their nose badly and surprisingly bloodied the last time they invaded Lebanon. It's not legitiimizing Israel's policies to say that they have an understandable concern about Iranian involvement in Syria and Lebanon.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bristolboy said:

Really? The Israelis got their nose badly and surprisingly bloodied the last time they invaded Lebanon. It's not legitiimizing Israel's policies to say that they have an understandable concern about Iranian involvement in Syria and Lebanon.

That's outside their borders, even the occupied territories. That's what I meant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...