Trump administration faces lawsuit over pesticides in wildlife refuges

 

FILE PHOTO: U.S. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke testifies before a Senate Appropriations Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Subcommittee hearing on the FY2019 funding request and budget justification for the Interior Department, on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., May 10, 2018. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas

 

(Reuters) - Conservationists on Wednesday notified the Trump administration that they would sue over its reversal of a 2014 decision prohibiting bee-killing pesticides and genetically modified crops on U.S. wildlife refuges.

 

The reversal, issued on Aug. 2 in a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service memo, suggested that neonicotinoid pesticides, or neonics, were needed for "farming practices” in refuge areas where that was allowed.

 

Cultivation of biotech crops, engineered to resist pests and withstand herbicides, has helped maximize crop production on dozens of wildlife refuges.

 

A certain amount of agricultural activity has been permitted on some refuges, where typically a share of the crops is harvested by farmers for profit while another share is left as food or habitat for animals.

 

Conservationists said in Wednesday’s notice of a pending lawsuit that neonics and pesticides to which biotech crops are immune are known to injure and kill imperiled creatures that rely on refuges whose fundamental purpose is wildlife conservation.

 

“It’s shameful that the government is promoting agents that its own scientists say harm threatened and endangered species,” Hannah Connor, attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity, told Reuters.

 

The notice by the Arizona-based group and the Center for Food Safety to U.S. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke and the deputy director of the Fish and Wildlife Service, an Interior agency, said the lawsuit would be filed in federal court in 60 days unless the new policy is rescinded.

 

A spokeswoman for Zinke referred inquiries to the U.S. Justice Department, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

 

In 2014, amid lawsuits by environmentalists, the head of the system that oversees the nation’s 560 refuge units ordered phasing out of GM crops and the use of neonics since they could harm “non-target” animals and plants and since they were not needed for wildlife management goals that had been successfully met in their absence.

 

(Reporting by Laura Zuckerman in Pinedale, Wyoming; Editing by Bill Tarrant and James Dalgleish)

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-08-09

 

On the plus side they've not yet approved the use of Russian Asbestos as a pesticide.

 

One Russian company seems thrilled with Trump’s move on asbestos

 

The US Environmental Protection Agency is moving to open new avenues to approve asbestos products, and at least one Russian asbestos producer seems thrilled about it. Earlier this summer, Uralasbest posted a photo on Facebook of pallets of its product wrapped in film stamped with an image of Donald Trump.

 

Russia is the sole source of asbestos to the US.

 

https://qz.com/1351489/trumps-asbestos-move-thrills-one-russian-company/

 

 

 

Edited August 8, 20187 yr by mtls2005

Every day in every way this administration (along with China) is pushing the planet further towards environmental Armageddon. 

 

“In the Amazon, you may walk for days without seeing a tree; in Beijing, the air is the colour of a bruise. Three thousand miles of litter floats in the Atlantic Ocean, plastic bags and old nappies, bumping against the side of the ships... I sat before a committee in Brussells and they said, ‘What do you want us to do about it? If we change now, we’ll destroy our own economies,’ and I said, ‘You have destroyed your own world’ 
 

Claire North, The End of the Day

Edited August 9, 20187 yr by Bluespunk

3 hours ago, webfact said:

“It’s shameful that the government is promoting agents that its own scientists say harm threatened and endangered species,” Hannah Connor, attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity, told Reuters.

It is shameful that such an ignorant and arrogant " President "and his administration are allowed and being able to create such a mess .

They are definitely ' shortsighted ' as they seem not to be able to see the consequences of their acts .

5 minutes ago, nobodysfriend said:

It is shameful that such an ignorant and arrogant " President "and his administration are allowed and being able to create such a mess .

They are definitely ' shortsighted ' as they seem not to be able to see the consequences of their acts .

They see them. 

 

They just don’t care. 

Try it out on Donald and Stephen miller a nice big dose!