Thai healthcare gets a global nod of approval

[webfact]

Thai healthcare gets a global nod of approval

By Chularat Saengpassa 
The Nation

 

File photo

 

PM PLEASED AS KINGDOM JUMPS 14 PLACES IN RANKINGS; ACTIVISTS CALL FOR FUNDING BOOST

 

THE PRIME MINISTER yesterday praised the country for “leapfrogging” the global healthcare efficiency rankings, but health activists called for higher funding to ensure sustainability.

 

“Our healthcare system will be even more efficient if the government ensures enough funding. The government should not view the healthcare system and people’s health as a burden,” Nimit Tien-udom, director of the Aids Access Foundation, said.

 

His remarks came as Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha voiced his satisfaction about the country’s rise in the latest Bloomberg Healthcare Efficiency Index, which saw Thailand jump 14 spots from last year, Government Spokesman Lt-General Sansern Kaewkamnerd said yesterday.

 

Sustarum Thammaboosadee, a lecturer at Thammasat University’s Interdisciplinary Studies College, yesterday also called for the government to be sincere in allocating funds for the universal healthcare system.

 

He also pointed out that getting poor patients to be partly responsible for healthcare cost was not fair. Of the 56 countries surveyed, Thailand rose to 27, up from 41 last year – the biggest annual improvement by any country.

 

The country’s per-capita spending on healthcare dropped to 40 per cent to US$219 (Bt7,086), while life expectancy rose to 75.1 years, up from 74.6 last year. Bloomberg’s health-efficiency index takes into account total expenditure on health, including preventive and curative health services, family planning, nutrition activities and emergency aid. 

 

 

Out of some 200 economies across the world, the index only ranks countries with an average lifespan of at least 70 years, per capita income exceeding $5,000 (Bt162,000) a year and a minimum population of 5 million.

 

Sources of data include the World Bank, World Health Organisation (WHO), United Nations Population Division and International Monetary Fund.

 

Prayut noted that the WHO had recently named Thailand as a model and source of learning about universal healthcare, the government spokesman said. “WHO views our system as sustainable because public participation is strongly encouraged,” Sansern said yesterday. The Kingdom’s healthcare system has many strengths such as low cost, good service, many standard hospitals and strong government support, the spokesman added.

 

Public Health Minister Piyasakol Sakolsatayadorn yesterday also hailed Thailand’s jump in the global index. He noted that the country was ranked ninth among Asia-Pacific economies, after Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, Japan, Australia, Taiwan, New Zealand and China. The Bloomberg report also stated that medical tourism is among Thailand’s fastest-growing industries, the health minister said.

 

However, Nimit said more has to be done in terms of public health such as fairer budget allocation for people in the bureaucratic system and ordinary patients under the universal healthcare system. The activist said the $219 healthcare cost cited in the Bloomberg index was obviously an average of the state budget allocated to Thailand’s different healthcare systems. He pointed out that Bt3,426 was set aside per patient in the national universal healthcare system each year, compared to about Bt14,000 per person allocated in the bureaucratic welfare system. He said the government should also help lower the cost of medicines by encouraging the use of and improving the quality of generic drugs that can be manufactured locally. 

 

The government should also boost the potential of small, local state-run health centres, so they can help large hospitals deal with patients, he said. 

 

Only three Asean countries appear in this year’s index – Singapore in second place, Thailand 27th and Malaysia 29th.

 

Thailand fared better than many developed countries in the index, with the Netherlands ranking one place below the Kingdom at 28, United Kingdom ranking 35th, Denmark 41st, Germany 45th and the US 54th.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30355066

-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-09-24

[mfd101]

An interesting measure - of EFFICIENCY ie the ratio of resource inputs to useful outputs (& even outcomes!).

 

And on this measure the wealthy 'Western' countries don't do too well, Usofa least of all - too costly for mediocre outcomes.

[Mexlark]

Finding ways to ward off the Big Pharma vampire will be therapeutic everywhere. Anti-depressants and opiods spring to mind immediately, but there are many others.

[dickjones2018]

look at the US ... spend most on healthcare and most people have at least one chronic disease... pay the most, get the least...

 

people get sick from all the chemicals ... air pollution, water contamination (chemicals other pee out, cannot be filtered),  food that looks like food... if it has a label of ingredients, it is clearly NOT FOOD but food-like chemicals sold at a big profit

[Chris Lawrence]

didn't they sack some head medico's a few years ago, who were complaining about the quality of the health system?

[wirat69]

5 hours ago, webfact said:

, the index only ranks countries with ..... and a minimum population of 5 million.

 

5 hours ago, webfact said:

Public Health Minister Piyasakol Sakolsatayadorn  ....... ninth among Asia-Pacific economies, after Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, Japan, Australia, Taiwan, New Zealand and China.

Jeez, New Zealand has had a population explosion to be included in the Minister’s statement!!

[CLW]

All useless without an efficient ambulance rescue system.
In Bangkok they're stuck in the traffic jam and in the countryside they need far too much time.
How about a public founded air rescue?

[yellowboat]

15 hours ago, webfact said:

Prayut noted that the WHO had recently named Thailand as a model and source of learning about universal healthcare,

Not immigration.  During the hight of junta mania, 2014,  hospitals were saying if you were insured in Thailand, there was no guarantee that immigration would let you in.

 

To be fair, the care is good in Thailand, but that is true in Taiwan and Malaysia too.   Even Hong Kong can compete with Thailand on some things.   You better shop around.