1 hour ago, Thakkar said:

 

Are you saying Dr Ford was prepared with her accusation against Kavanaugh since Nov 2016 when Trump’s list of potential nominees was announced?

 

Don't know, don't care. Not interested in decades old he said/she said arguments unless there was some concurrent reporting of same. If there is irrefutable proof, then that's a different story.

 

Don't care if Supreme Court nomineess are left leaning or right leaning, though I've always found a balance between the two is nice and makes for better law. I DO care if SC nominees are or have been political operatives in the past (of either stripe), and by all accounts this guy certainly was. If I had a vote I would disqualify him on those grounds.

Edited September 26, 20187 yr by lannarebirth

5 hours ago, lannarebirth said:

 

Don't know, don't care. Not interested in decades old he said/she said arguments unless there was some concurrent reporting of same. If there is irrefutable proof, then that's a different story.

 

Don't care if Supreme Court nomineess are left leaning or right leaning, though I've always found a balance between the two is nice and makes for better law. I DO care if SC nominees are or have been political operatives in the past (of either stripe), and by all accounts this guy certainly was. If I had a vote I would disqualify him on those grounds.

"Not interested in decades old he said/she said arguments unless there was some concurrent reporting of same."

Lots of concurrent reporting of same now.

Letter sent to Senate Judiciary Committee. Despite repeated allegations, Republican Senators are hell bent on sending a sexual predator to the Supreme Court!

 

 

 

10 hours ago, riclag said:

No need to insult me,either. It's ok to use adjectives  describing groups or people,but not ok  to use personal insults to members . That is where to draw the line 

 

11 hours ago, riclag said:

I want to see the femanazi's rolling around the committee floor shouting obscenities.

 

Way to go!

3 minutes ago, Silurian said:

Letter sent to Senate Judiciary Committee. Despite repeated allegations, Republican Senators are hell bent on sending a sexual predator to the Supreme Court!

 

 

 

 

Maybe. Kavanaugh is looking like toast right now, notwithstanding the Conspiracy Theory crowd here throwing their rattles on the floor.

44 minutes ago, stevenl said:

"Not interested in decades old he said/she said arguments unless there was some concurrent reporting of same."

Lots of concurrent reporting of same now.

 

You mean he's being accused of committing sexual assault THIS WEEK? Wow! Hold the presses!

Edited September 27, 20187 yr by lannarebirth

22 minutes ago, Silurian said:

Letter sent to Senate Judiciary Committee. Despite repeated allegations, Republican Senators are hell bent on sending a sexual predator to the Supreme Court!

 

 

 

 

It just doesn't ring true, and I'm a guy with two gorgeous daughters whom I worry about constantly. Washington DC had 911 services well before the date you mention and the guy who has been nominated was previously nominated for the DC Circuit Court position. Those were two excellent opportunities to bring up this issue. The concurrent one being the better of the two. That said, I think he's a shitty candidate based on his previously being a highly partisan political operative.

31 minutes ago, Silurian said:

Letter sent to Senate Judiciary Committee. Despite repeated allegations, Republican Senators are hell bent on sending a sexual predator to the Supreme Court!

 

 

 

So he shoved the girl he was banging, up against the wall in a sexual way? And she is still traumatized to this day? 

I wonder how she handled the intimate parts of the relationship? 

Edited September 27, 20187 yr by canuckamuck

Posters trying to minimize accusations, defend the SC candidate's actions (while, oddly enough, he himself denies them), claim it's old news, boys-will-be-boys etc. - seem to waiver the concept that judges (and more so life-time appointees to the SC) are to be held to a higher standard. That you, me and other members did this or that or may have conducted ourselves in a less than impeccable manner is irrelevant. It's not like the guy is a candidate for TVF Poster of the Year, or the President of the United States.

 

 

12 minutes ago, canuckamuck said:

So he shoved the girl he was banging, up against the wall in a sexual way? And she is still traumatized to this day? 

I wonder how she handled the intimate parts of the relationship? 

 

I guess you just darn clean forgot the 'aggressive' bit.

1 minute ago, SheungWan said:

 

I guess you just darn clean forgot the 'aggressive' bit.

Aggressive is an incredibly plastic term. Do you mean aggressive as in passionate, or aggressive as in the Japanese resistance in the Pacific war?

With all the crazy, demented libturds out there, I am surprised there isnt a thousand allegations  against this SCOTUS nominee flying about right now.

18 minutes ago, canuckamuck said:

Aggressive is an incredibly plastic term. Do you mean aggressive as in passionate, or aggressive as in the Japanese resistance in the Pacific war?

Plastic thoughts.

Let's face it, he probably did at least some of this stuff. You can say three accusations is some sort of hit job. But that isn't even the simplest answer. The simplest most logical answer at this point is he probably did some of this stuff. 

24 minutes ago, dcutman said:

With all the crazy, demented libturds out there, I am surprised there isnt a thousand allegations  against this SCOTUS nominee flying about right now.

And we really really respect you too.

15 minutes ago, utalkin2me said:

Let's face it, he probably did at least some of this stuff. You can say three accusations is some sort of hit job. But that isn't even the simplest answer. The simplest most logical answer at this point is he probably did some of this stuff. 

 

I'm an apolitical/atheist, but let's face it, in the absence of religion, which has largely gone by the wayside in Western countries, politics has become the new religion. People will "testify" to almost anything and ignore almost everything if it confirms their belief system.

Students at Kavanaugh's own alumni, Yale, has turned against him as well. So sad when your old University turns against you. It is very telling of his true character!

 

Yale turns on Kavanaugh

 

Quote

When Yale Law School put out a press release this summer congratulating Brett Kavanaugh, class of 1990, on his nomination to the Supreme Court, hundreds of students and alums expressed outrage.

 

Looks like someone else is starting to waver on Kavanaugh...

 

‘I could be convinced’: Trump sends mixed message on Kavanaugh charges

 

Quote

Saying that he intends to watch tomorrow’s hearing, he added: “I could be persuaded, also” about the accusations. Trump said he would withhold any final decision until he had watched the testimony of Christine Blasey Ford, a woman who has accused Kavanaugh of assault when they were both teenagers.

 

Well...well. When the person that nominates you isn't 100% sure of your character, you got major problems!

 

Edited September 27, 20187 yr by Silurian

28 minutes ago, Silurian said:

Students at Kavanaugh's own alumni, Yale, has turned against him as well. So sad when your old University turns against you. It is very telling of his true character!

 

Yale turns on

15 minutes ago, Silurian said:

Looks like someone else is starting to waver on Kavanaugh...

 

‘I could be convinced’: Trump sends mixed message on Kavanaugh charges

 

 

Well...well. When the person that nominates you isn't 100% sure of your character, you got major problems!

 

 

 

 

 

Regardless of party, the person that nominates you is never concerned about character. It is a much more cold hearted calculation, ie: "will my nominee be confirmed?"

On 9/25/2018 at 6:58 AM, Chomper Higgot said:

He’s not accused of ‘touching a boob’, he’s accused of attempted rape, using drugs and alcohol in rape and gang rape.

 

There are also indications he has conspired with others to cover these crimes.

 

And he has committed a string of accounts of perjury before The Senate.

 

 

He thinks he can bluff his way through this.

 

He, like you, needs to get with reality.

 

The gang rape story is ludicrous.

 

You have a woman that is admitting to being at parties where women were being raped. She made no report to the authorities about these acts.

 

She is saying that she suspects the punch was being spiked with drugs at these parties. She made no report to the authorities about this.

 

She is saying that she kept returning to these parties and ended up getting drugged and raped herself. 

 

The whole story is ridiculous.

 

On 9/25/2018 at 11:01 AM, Tug said:

Let the FBI do an investigation if cleared then seat the dude.That should satisfy the dems and the lady’s whats the hurry?

creepy uncle joe had somethin to say about the fbi during clarence thomas circus.

 

27 minutes ago, Srinivas said:

creepy uncle joe had somethin to say about the fbi during clarence thomas circus.

 

Yes, that is all correct, and that's been disingenuously distorted by "trump" and his fans. They do not reach CONCLUSIONS. They do INVESTIGATIONS.

 

Duh!

 

You get it now. Good!

 

The sexual misconduct allegations (from multiple women now) against BK have NOT been properly investigated by the FBI. Not at all.  The sleazy president and his TDS (the toxic mental state of still supporting a criminally corrupt president no matter what he says or does) fans have been aggressively resisting such FBI actions.

 

Yes, it is true, BK has undergone numerous FBI background checks in the past.

 

But this is NEW information. The sexual misconduct allegations. Normally, that would prompt an additional FBI INVESTIGATION. It could have been done in a matter of days. The hypocrite republican president BLOCKED it as "trump" is the only person who can authorize it. Shame on him and shame on everyone that supports him on this. 

 

BK for his part play acts that he was an innocent little church boy at Georgetown Prep. We know for a fact that's total B.S. So he lies about that, what else is he lying about? Hmmm.

 

If B.K. was really innocent and he really wanted to clear his name, he would publicly demand that "trump" open up that NEW FBI INVESTIGATION. His silence is damning!

Edited September 27, 20187 yr by Jingthing

 

Trump Supreme Court nominee rejects 'false accusations'

 

if he's rejecting 'false accusations', doesn't that make them true...?!

52 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Yes, that is all correct, and that's been disingenuously distorted by "trump" and his fans. They do not reach CONCLUSIONS. They do INVESTIGATIONS.

 

Duh!

 

You get it now. Good!

 

The sexual misconduct allegations (from multiple women now) against BK have NOT been properly investigated by the FBI. Not at all.  The sleazy president and his TDS (the toxic mental state of still supporting a criminally corrupt president no matter what he says or does) fans have been aggressively resisting such FBI actions.

 

Yes, it is true, BK has undergone numerous FBI background checks in the past.

 

But this is NEW information. The sexual misconduct allegations. Normally, that would prompt an additional FBI INVESTIGATION. It could have been done in a matter of days. The hypocrite republican president BLOCKED it as "trump" is the only person who can authorize it. Shame on him and shame on everyone that supports him on this. 

 

BK for his part play acts that he was an innocent little church boy at Georgetown Prep. We know for a fact that's total B.S. So he lies about that, what else is he lying about? Hmmm.

 

If B.K. was really innocent and he really wanted to clear his name, he would publicly demand that "trump" open up that NEW FBI INVESTIGATION. His silence is damning!

 

 

 

Again, "trump" fans -- keep in mind that a senate confirmation process is supposed to be much more like a job interview than a criminal trial. Beyond a reasonable doubt is about criminal trials. Got it now? Good. 

And now a 5th being reported.  This is madness of one kind or another.  All these allegations need to be thoroughly investigated, and if they are true I hope the judge sees some jail time, but if turns out to be a massive coordinated smear campaign as our right-leaning friends would have us believe, then people need to be punished just the same.

Edited September 27, 20187 yr by Slip

2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Again, "trump" fans -- keep in mind that a senate confirmation process is supposed to be much more like a job interview than a criminal trial. Beyond a reasonable doubt is about criminal trials. Got it now? Good. 

off topic but why do you put trump in quotes? lol 

 

2 minutes ago, Slip said:

And now a 5th being reported.  This is madness of one kind or another.  All these allegations need to be thoroughly investigated, and if they are true I hope the judge sees some jail time, but if turns out to be a massive coordinated smear campaign as our right-leaning friends would have us believe, then people need to be punished just the same.

agree but you,dont need to be right leaning to see its coordinated to smear

with admittedly unprovable allegations.

 

 

 

off topic but why do you put trump in quotes? lol 
 

Because "trump" did. Pay attention.

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

3 minutes ago, Srinivas said:

agree but you,dont need to be right leaning to see its coordinated to smear

with admittedly unprovable allegations.

 

 

 

Then why isn't the good judge demanding the allegations be investigated with all his might?