Congratulations on the first English Royal quadroon.  Only a few hours old, and already seventh in line to the throne.  There's a stroke of amazing luck.

2 hours ago, VocalNeal said:

The kid is part American and part British. Does that make him Canadian?

 

 

The uncertainty is probably the reason for the reluctance to have the scheduled 2 mins photo opportunity on the hospital steps.

All in hand for 48hrs time...

 

The 'we pay their wages' brigade should note that proceeds from image rights are a 'nice little earner' doing wonders to reduce the burden they think they're carrying ????

 

 

The woman who took this netted GBP 40k overnight. The Duchess of Cambridge takes all her own Children's photos; a trend that I suspect will catch on in this case....& lets not forget Lords Snowden & Litchfield from the 60s & 70s who popularized the Royals in much the same manner.

Edited May 7, 20197 yr by evadgib

She just seems so fake. Better actress on suits than in real life hahahahaha

 

12 hours ago, Basil B said:

but as I understand it Meghan is subject to IRS tax and until he is 18 his wealth would part of his mothers tax assessment. 

 

Edit in:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47889162

That's OK. Harrys Grandmother is worth 600 million USD. She can help out.

12 hours ago, CharlieH said:

Highly unikely, $5 mil is nothing and apart from Suits which was scheduled to end (for her character) she was a nobody, she made "him" her career move and next well paid role. (IMHO)

She is not what I would call a Hollywood star and I don't think she ever would be. She was nobody before Suits. She was only a bit actor. 

12 hours ago, Basil B said:

but as I understand it Meghan is subject to IRS tax and until he is 18 his wealth would part of his mothers tax assessment. 

 

Edit in:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47889162

Simply drop her US citizenship and become a wholly British subject.

Who cares about the IRS anyway  especially if youre living in a castle in England.

13 minutes ago, Suphtcha said:

She just seems so fake

Yep and knows that Harry is her ticket to a good future, so snared him, in the same way as some B/Gs here can do!!

Edited May 7, 20197 yr by xylophone

Who cares? 

At least Brenda won't now have to meet that ghastly Trump man.  She can say she's babysitting at the time.

1 hour ago, Longcut said:

She is not what I would call a Hollywood star and I don't think she ever would be. She was nobody before Suits. She was only a bit actor. 

She made it big time! and plenty more A grade  productions heading her way so the millions would continue.

 

However if I had to choose between  $5 mill or a marrying a Royal I would grab that 5 and run

15 hours ago, faraday said:

James?

I just got 10 - 1  with William Hill   for    Delroy 

14 hours ago, elliss said:

Sure , on the burden of the working class , UK taxpayers .

God save the working class, most on zero hour contracts ..

"Sure , on the burden of the working class , UK taxpayers".

You really need to brush-up on where the Duke of Sussex actually gets his, his wife's and his child's incomes from.

 

"God save the working class, most on zero hour contracts .."

Most of the UK's working class are not on zero-hour contracts.

15 hours ago, OneEyedPie said:

My personal view is I can't stand this pair.  They want to be down with it but seem to forget the British taxpayer pays handsomely for their every waking moment 

"They want to be down with it but seem to forget the British taxpayer pays handsomely for their every waking moment..."

No, they do not forget that as the British taxpayer does not support them.

15 hours ago, elliss said:

Spot on mate .

In actual fact he was far from "spot on".

14 hours ago, elliss said:

Thx for your reply , 

 i do not pay any UK  tax , i live in LOS on my UK disability benefits . 

   Living like a king , in paradise. Thx taxpayers.. 555

You missed his point completely, didn't you?

 

"i do not pay any UK  tax , i live in LOS on my UK disability benefits". 

Taking more from UK taxpayers than Harry and his family, then! 

Is what you're doing legal if you're here for more than 13 weeks?

Edited May 7, 20197 yr by Just Weird

14 hours ago, OneEyedPie said:

MM's sacrifice is mine as a taxpayer.  

Why?  Do you think that you support her in any way?  How?

14 hours ago, CharlieH said:

Cheque book at the ready ! As a Grandparent he has legal rights to access the child.

Grandparents do not have that right in the UK.

Edited May 7, 20197 yr by Just Weird

we all knew she had it in her

14 hours ago, sharktooth said:

Great. Another parasite!

"Parasite" on whom?

4 minutes ago, Just Weird said:

Grandparents do not have that right in the UK.

Section 11 of the Act, they can apply for a court order seeking contact with the child.

"It is rare that a court would refuse access"

Just now, CharlieH said:

Section 11 of the Act, they can apply for a court order seeking contact with the child.

You're right about that but that is very different to your post.  

 

Grandparents do not have an automatic legal right to access to their grandchildren.   They can apply for contact to a court, which is not what you claimed and what I responded to.

1 minute ago, Just Weird said:

You're right about that but that is very different to your post.  

 

Grandparents do not have an automatic legal right to access to their grandchildren.   They can apply for contact to a court, which is not what you claimed and what I responded to.

I didnt say "automatic right" just a "legal right" which is the right to apply for access, which he does,

3 hours ago, evadgib said:

All in hand for 48hrs time...

 

The 'we pay their wages' brigade should note that proceeds from image rights are a 'nice little earner' doing wonders to reduce the burden they think they're carrying ????

 

 

The woman who took this netted GBP 40k overnight. The Duchess of Cambridge takes all her own Children's photos; a trend that I suspect will catch on in this case....& lets not forget Lords Snowden & Litchfield from the 60s & 70s who popularized the Royals in much the same manner.

The "we pay their wages brigade" should also realise that they could not be more wrong about their assertion!

Inappropriate image removed.

 

Post commenting on Moderation also removed.

 

10) Do not comment on moderation publicly in the open forum; this includes individual actions, and specific or general policies and issues. This also includes posting an emoticon in response to a public notice made by a moderator. 

You may send a PM to a moderator to discuss individual actions or email support (at) thaivisa.com to discuss moderation policy.

I am happy for them with their new child. To me the Royals and the pomp and ceremony that goes with them are one of the biggest tourist attractions to Britain. They earn their keep. And living my life in the Public Eye is certainly not a life i would want.

7 minutes ago, Kiwiken said:

To me the Royals and the pomp and ceremony that goes with them are one of the biggest tourist attractions to Britain.

 

Britain's top 50 tourist attractions.  Not one of them is closely associated with Brenda and her firm.

 

British Museum
National Gallery
Natural History Museum
Southbank Centre
Tate Modern
Victoria and Albert Museum
Science Museum
Somerset House
Tower of London
National Portrait Gallery
Kew Gardens, London
Library of Birmingham - 1.8 million
Chester Zoo - 1.6 million
Old Royal Naval College, Greenwich - 1.6 million
Westminster Abbey - 1.6 million
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew - 1.6 million
St Paul's Cathedral - 1.6 million
British Library - 1.5 million
Edinburgh Castle - 1.5 million
National Museum of Scotland - 1.5 million
Scottish National Gallery - 1.3 million
Roman Baths in Bath
Stonehenge - 1.3 million
National Maritime Museum - 1.3 million
Tate Britain - 1.2 million
ZSL London Zoo - 1.2 million
Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum - 1.2 million
Roman Baths and Pump Room - 1.1 million
Riverside Museum - 1.1 million
IWM London - 1.1 million
The Royal Academy of Arts - 1 million
RHS Garden Wisley - 1 million

National Museum of the Royal Navy - 1 million
The Royal Shakespeare Theatre & Swan Theatre - 1 million
Eden Project - 960,029
Canterbury Cathedral - 957,355
Birmingham Museum - 936,839
Houses of Parliament - 928,855
Royal Botanic Gardens Edinburgh - 889,420
Museum of London - 872,978
Horniman Museum - 866,188
Giant's Causeway - 851,314
Shakespeare week
Ashmolean Museum - 847,716
Tower Bridge Exhibition -786,603
Royal Observatory Greenwich - 778,941
National Football Museum - 776,000
Shakespeare Birthplace Trust - 771,700
Blenheim Palace, Oxfordshire - 763,045
Museum of Liverpool - 747,263
ZSL Whipsnade Zoo - 736,900
National Railway Museum - 733,618
Museum of Science and Industry - 697,290

 

Source:  https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/uks-top-50-visitor-attractions-7509660

Posters need to brush up on Thailands LM laws. I believe it applies across the board for ALL Royalty and not restricted to Thailand.

See you all in 15 years.

11 hours ago, emptypockets said:

Posters need to brush up on Thailands LM laws. I believe it applies across the board for ALL Royalty and not restricted to Thailand.

See you all in 15 years.

I love them, I love them to bits