The Trump administration is considering a land swap that would allow part of Yosemite National Park to be conveyed to a private company, according to a document submitted to Congress. A National Park Service (NPS) document obtained by The Hill says a landowner wants to connect their property to a park service road, with the aim of enabling commercial development. The file sets out that the NPS would exchange land interests to accommodate the proposal. Land Exchange ProposalThe document describes the exchange as a mechanism for the NPS to “convey an interest in land”. It adds that the landowner would need to purchase property either within Yosemite National Park or inside other National Park Service units in California. The NPS said it was working with the landowner on an exchange that would require that land purchase as part of the arrangement. The document framed the process as an exchange rather than a transfer without compensation. Interior Department ResponseThe Interior Department, which oversees the NPS, told a Senate office—according to responses shared with The Hill—that the land swap was a “priority”. Asked about the proposal, the department said it had not made any final decisions. It said that if a proposal progressed, it would follow “established procedures” designed to ensure coordination, transparency and public involvement in line with federal law. The department also rejected claims that it was secretly trying to hand over NPS land to a private developer. It said there had been no political pressure to reach a predetermined outcome and described the allegations as false. The proposed swap was first reported by NOTUS, which said the administration was looking to give the land to a firm operated by real-estate developer and investment company Kingsbarn Realty Capital. The Hill attempted to contact Kingsbarn for comment. Private Developer And Legal ArgumentsNOTUS reported that Lanny Davis, described as an attorney for Kingsbarn, had argued for the land exchange. In comments to NOTUS, Davis said he was not acting for President Donald Trump, but described himself as having gone to the Department of Interior to make the case. Davis said the decision would be “pro-environmental” because it would allow construction of a road intended to provide access to and from a privately owned property. He said the road involved would be built in a way that did not endanger endangered species, and he described it as “simply a road”. Criticism From Democrats And AdvocatesThe proposal has drawn criticism from Democrats in Congress. Sen. Alex Padilla, a Californian Democrat, said in a written statement to The Hill that the administration was “most corrupt” and that the Land and Water Conservation Fund exists to acquire land and interests in land to protect natural areas, water resources and cultural heritage. Padilla said projects should be chosen on merit rather than on connections to senior Trump administration figures. His office said it was working with the Senate Appropriations Committee to seek to block the project from moving forward. A spokesperson for Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon, the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Interior, Environment and Related Agencies Subcommittee, told The Hill that Merkley also opposed the swap. Parks advocates also criticised the plan. Mark Rose, senior Sierra Nevada programme manager for the National Parks Conservation Association, said in a written statement that the administration’s actions threatened the country’s conservation legacy and that the deal would turn NPS land over to a private developer. Join the discussion? 29 August 2026
View full article
Create an account or sign in to comment