Greenpeace proposes widespread collection fee to drive push against disposables

[Jonathan Fairfield]

Greenpeace proposes widespread collection fee to drive push against disposables

 

 

Greenpeace has proposed an indiscriminately-implemented collection fee as a means to eradicate single-use plastic bags and containers from disposal, as well as to establish an independent fund for rehabilitation of Thailand’s seas.

 

The popular environmental group’s proposal comes on the heels of the deaths of two endangered dugongs, one of whom was apparently killed by swallowing discarded plastic.

 

Tara Buakamsri, the Thailand country director for Greenpeace Southeast Asia, said the deaths of the animals raised a question about the adequacy of the nation’s official roadmap for Plastic Waste Management. That roadmap, which aimed to reduce the amount of plastic garbage by 0.78 million tonnes annually, received the Cabinet's nod in April. Would it be enough to prevent such tragedies in the future? Tara wondered.

 

The 12-year roadmap (2018-2030) addressed the manufacturing stage of plastic waste management, the consumption stage and the post-consumption stage, as well as the challenges due to a lack of legal enforcement mechanisms such as a law to require manufacturers to identify the type of plastic in containers, another to limit single-use plastic bags and containers and another law to promote garbage separation.

 

However, said Tara, there was no guarantee that the roadmap would lead to a sustainable solution for plastic waste management. Without a law enforcement mechanism, the roadmap would not in practice reach much beyond promoting public awareness and voluntary measures and so there would be no guarantee of concrete changes for the better.

 

While the roadmap would phrase out the use of seven types of single-use plastic products, Greenpeace would like to see imposition of an indiscriminately-implemented fee collection nationwide. That would serve to separate the tackling of environment impacts (regarding sea and marine life) due to single-use plastics, from other clear strategies and solutions including implementing specific laws and created an independent fund for rehabilitating Thailand’s seas. Also, it would catalyse public participation and support for further action instead of being limited to public awareness and voluntary measures, said Tara.

 

Those companies that manufacture or distribute quickly consumed goods such as packaging should implement affirmative policies and clear action plans that transparently show their environmental footprints, and the steps they would take to phase out the use of single-use plastics, Tara said.

 

The “circular economy” idea, now being advocated by corporates, is cited by the roadmap as being able to reduce the amount of plastic waste by 0.79 million tonnes per year, reduce 1.2 million tonnes of greenhouse gas, and obtain 1,830 million kilowatts in electricity. However, it is based on burning plastic waste for energy and should be reviewed. The roadmap failed to mention the amount of carbon dioxide from burning such plastics, Tara noted, adding that burning 0.97 million tonnes of plastic would in fact emit 22.83 million tonnes of the greenhouse gas.

 

Citing information from the Department of Marine and Coastal Resources, Tara said approximately 300 marine life animals die from eating garbage and fishing tool debris per year in Thailand.

 

The roadmap, approved by the Cabinet on April 17, would ban the use of three plastic products – plastic cap seals on water bottles, oxo-degradable plastics and plastic microbeads – by the end of this year.

 

Four other products, to be phased out by 2022, are polystyrene foam food boxes, plastic straws, single-use plastic cups and plastic bags of less than 36 microns in thickness. Five years later, in 2027, 100 per cent of plastic waste would be reusable if the plan were fully implemented.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30375506

 

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2019-08-28

Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking Thailand news and visa info

[Fred white]

Green piece needs to stop contributing to global warming by stop breathing

[Harveyg]

Just wondering.  I dont think styrofoam is plastic.  If thats the case, could Thailand replace plastic with styrofoam??  I see styrofoam all over the place.

[Krataiboy]

Socialism hidden behind a green mask.

[johng]

And as usual the list of official recycling sites where citizens can take their "stuff" for safe disposal is not mentioned...is that because there are no such sites ?

[timendres]

29 minutes ago, Harveyg said:

Just wondering.  I dont think styrofoam is plastic.  If thats the case, could Thailand replace plastic with styrofoam??  I see styrofoam all over the place.

Styrofoam is not a good choice by any measure, and needs to be reduced along with plastics. I have often felt that charging for plastic bags to encourage people to use reusable bags, while still providing a bag when it is really needed (e.g., today I could not bring my reusable bag), is a good idea. Unfortunately, I do not trust any government or NGO to properly handle the money that is generated.

[Kinnock]

I supported Greenpeace with monthly donations for years, from their early days of 'Save the whales' Rainbow Warrior and anti-nuclear protests, but I realized that the the battle has been long lost, and Greenpeace, along with all the politicians, totally failed.

 

And plastic is far from being the most serious issue impacting on the environment (just the most visible), but Greenpeace, like all businesses, has seen an opportunity to gain publicity and funding by jumping on the plastic bandwagon.  Too little, too late.

 

[Harveyg]

On 8/28/2019 at 10:05 PM, timendres said:

Styrofoam is not a good choice by any measure, and needs to be reduced along with plastics. I have often felt that charging for plastic bags to encourage people to use reusable bags, while still providing a bag when it is really needed (e.g., today I could not bring my reusable bag), is a good idea. Unfortunately, I do not trust any government or NGO to properly handle the money that is generated.

Sorry.  I was not advocating styrofoam in the least. Just wondered if Thais would see it as a way out. 

Ive been using reusable plastic since early 90s, but I’m thinking to do cloth of some kind-not sure yet. 

Even if there’s corruption charging 2-3 bt/bag may get some results. 

[CALSinCM]

Greenpeace proposing taxes simply tells me the connection between Greenpeace and governments.

 

If that organization and the governments were serious, then they would ban single use plastics all together.  But that doesn't bring in cash flows to the government - who would want to kill a cash cow? 

[fforest1]

I will be inviting Greenpeace to Thailand for a Dugong buffet.....