2 hours ago, Crazy Alex said:

Thanks for that. I am not up to speed with the whole issue. But typically, when people want to make sex lives an issue, it means their case is lacking.

Except in cases where a government official is in a personal relationship with someone and she gets money from a source that he controls. 

The point of this really isn't sex. It's about personal relationships. It's no more acceptable for Johnson to direct public monies to a family member, a business partner, or a friend than it is for him to direct money to someone he's involved with in a sexual relationship. 

1 hour ago, bristolboy said:

The point of this really isn't sex. It's about personal relationships. It's no more acceptable for Johnson to direct public monies to a family member, a business partner, or a friend than it is for him to direct money to someone he's involved with in a sexual relationship. 

Your opinion is not based on the facts but your constant liberal pc politics everyday, on every subject. Anyway this has been reported and IF you are right (and you are not) then it will come out in the report. This is about Brexit and politics and that is all. We do not want the UK turning into another USA full of muck raking and scandal.

18 minutes ago, BobBKK said:

Your opinion is not based on the facts but your constant liberal pc politics everyday, on every subject. Anyway this has been reported and IF you are right (and you are not) then it will come out in the report. This is about Brexit and politics and that is all. We do not want the UK turning into another USA full of muck raking and scandal.

Are you saying Johnson didn't have a sexual relationship with her? Or are you contending that whe wasn't disbursed public monies from a mayoral fund? 

2 hours ago, bristolboy said:

Are you saying Johnson didn't have a sexual relationship with her? Or are you contending that whe wasn't disbursed public monies from a mayoral fund? 

It's a 'if Brexit wasn't happening on 31 Oct we'd have heard nuffink about it'.

1 hour ago, evadgib said:

4 hours ago, bristolboy said:

Are you saying Johnson didn't have a sexual relationship with her? Or are you contending that whe wasn't disbursed public monies from a mayoral fund? 

It's a 'if Brexit wasn't happening on 31 Oct we'd have heard nuffink about it'.

 

That would be really bad. Don't you understand that giving public money to someone you are having a relationship with is corruption ?

 

If something like that would happen in a third world country like ehhhh...  We would all agree about this.

 

 

 

19 minutes ago, dimitriv said:

That would be really bad. Don't you understand that giving public money to someone you are having a relationship with is corruption ?

 

If something like that would happen in a third world country like ehhhh...  We would all agree about this.

Yep, got that at the first attempt. The thing that isn't so clear is the timeframe between him leaving office as mayor and the fortnight or so 'til Brexit. If anyone can explain how stopping brexit is NOT ultimately behind this i'm all ears...

Edited October 14, 20196 yr by evadgib

On 10/8/2019 at 7:09 AM, soalbundy said:

she's trying to forget it

Nice one.????????????

21 hours ago, Crazy Alex said:

I just hope poor Boris doesn't own a dog or soon we'll be hearing how mean he is to it. And sadly, I'm dead serious.

Funny you should mention that 

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-49548946

 

 

Boris Johnson's new rescue puppy moves into Downing Street

 

wonder what has happened to it since - or was it just a photo-op?