British Woman Detained at Ladprao Mall for Alleged Theft of Branded Cream

[rooster59]

Indian court gives disputed religious site to Hindus in landmark ruling

By Nigam Prusty, Suchitra Mohanty and Mayank Bhardwaj

 

Rapid Action Force (RAF) personnel stand guard outside a mosque before Supreme Court's verdict on a disputed religious site in Ayodhya, in Mumbai, India November 9, 2019. REUTERS/Prashant Waydande

 

NEW DELHI/AYODHYA, India (Reuters) - India's Supreme Court on Saturday awarded a bitterly contested religious site to Hindus, dealing a defeat to Muslims who also claim the land that has sparked some of the country's bloodiest riots since independence.

 

The ruling in the dispute between Hindu and Muslim groups paves the way for the construction of a Hindu temple on the site in the northern town of Ayodhya, a proposal long supported by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's ruling Hindu-nationalist party.

 

Saturday's judgement, which is likely to be viewed as a win for Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its backers, was criticised as unfair by a lawyer for the Muslim group involved in the case.

 

However, the group's leader said ultimately it would accept the verdict and called for peace between India's majority Hindus and Muslims, who constitute 14% of its 1.3 billion people.

 

In 1992, a Hindu mob destroyed the 16th-century Babri Mosque on the site, triggering riots in which about 2,000 people, most of them Muslims, were killed across the country.

 

Court battles over the ownership of the site followed.

 

JUBILANT HINDUS CELEBRATE

 

Jubilant Hindus, who have long campaigned for a temple to be built on the ruins of the mosque, cheered and set off fire crackers in celebration in Ayodhya after the court decision was announced.

 

Thousands of paramilitary force members and police were deployed in Ayodhya and other sensitive areas across India. There were no immediate reports of unrest.

 

"Today's Supreme Court decision has given the nation the message that even the most difficult of all problems falls within the ambit of the constitution and within the boundaries of the judicial system," Modi said in a televised address on Saturday evening, calling for "a new India" free of hatred.

 

He had earlier tweeted that the verdict should not be seen as "a win or loss for anybody."

 

The ruling comes months after Modi's government stripped the Muslim-majority Jammu and Kashmir region of its special status as a state, delivering on yet another election promise to its largely Hindu support base.

 

Neelanjan Sircar, an assistant professor at Ashoka University near New Delhi, said the verdict would benefit the BJP, which won re-election in May, but a slowing economy would ultimately take centre stage for voters.

 

"In the short term, there will be a boost for the BJP," said Sircar. "These things don't work forever ... Ram Temple isn't going to put food on the table."

 

Hindus believe the site is the birthplace of Lord Ram, a physical incarnation of the Hindu god Vishnu, and say the site was holy for Hindus long before the Muslim Mughals, India's most prominent Islamic rulers, built the Babri mosque there in 1528.

 

'MILESTONE'

 

The five-judge bench, headed by the Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, reached a unanimous judgment to hand over the plot of just 2.77 acres (1.1 hectares), or about the size of a soccer field, to the Hindu group.

 

The court also directed that another plot of five acres (two hectares) in Ayodhya be provided to the Muslim group that contested the case, but that was not enough to mollify some critics.

 

"The country is now moving towards becoming a Hindu nation," Asaduddin Owaisi, an influential Muslim opposition politician, told reporters.

 

Across the border in arch-rival Pakistan, the foreign ministry said the decision "shredded the veneer of so-called secularism" in India and showed minorities were no longer safe.

 

Modi's party hailed the ruling as a "milestone".

 

"I welcome the court decision and appeal to all religious groups to accept the decision," Home Minister Amit Shah, who is also president of the BJP, said on Twitter.

 

A lawyer for the Sunni Muslim group involved in the case initially said it would likely file a review petition, which could have triggered another protracted legal battle, but its chairman Zafar Farooqui later on Saturday told reporters the verdict had been accepted "with humility."

 

Muslim organisations appealed for calm.

 

The Hindu group Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh - the parent organisation of Modi's party - had already decided against any celebrations to avoid provoking sectarian violence.

 

Restrictions were placed on gatherings in some places and internet services were suspended. Elsewhere, police monitored social media to curb rumours.

 

Streets in Ayodhya were largely deserted and security personnel patrolled the main road to Lucknow, the capital of the northern state of Uttar Pradesh.

 

Ayodhya residents were glued to their televisions and phones for news of the ruling, which delighted Hindus when it came.

 

"Everyone should come together to ensure that the construction work begins at the site without any delay," roadside vendor Jitan Singh said over the chants of "Jai Shri Ram" (hail Lord Ram) from fellow shop-keepers.

 

 

(Additional reporting Devjyot Ghoshal, Manoj Kumar, Sanjeev Miglani and Sankalp Phartiyal in New Delhi; Saurabh Sharma in Ayodhya; Kanishka Singh in Lucknow; Swati Bhat, Shilpa Jamkhandikar, Sudipto Ganguly and Rajendra Jadhav in Mumbai; Alasdair Pal in Kartarpur, Pakistan; Writing by Rupam Jain and Alexandra Ulmer; Editing by Euan Rocha, Robert Birsel and Helen Popper)

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-11-09

Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking Thailand news and visa info

 

 

[daoyai]

The muslems gotta be sharpening their daggers over this one ...stay tuned.

[Hank Gunn]

2 hours ago, rooster59 said:

Across the border in arch-rival Pakistan, the foreign ministry said the decision "shredded the veneer of so-called secularism" in India and showed minorities were no longer safe.

Ha, what a joke; "minorities no longer safe". Oh the irony. Try looking in the mirror bub.

[Bluespunk]

4 hours ago, rooster59 said:

 

Across the border in arch-rival Pakistan, the foreign ministry said the decision "shredded the veneer of so-called secularism" in India and showed minorities were no longer safe.

While I agree with statement, the irony of it coming from the government of Pakistan is not lost on me. 

[Bluespunk]

4 hours ago, rooster59 said:

I welcome the court decision and appeal to all religious groups to accept the decision," Home Minister Amit Shah, who is also president of the BJP, said on Twitter.

You have been warned...

[gk10002000]

so Mr. Jinnah back in the late 40s did not speak for all muslims when he demanded a separate muslim country, East and West Pakistan?

[Tchooptip]

Why I saw on al Jazeera the court cut the land in three giving 2/3 to Hindus and 1/3 to Muslims ? Fake news?

[mfd101]

Calm and reason reign in India yet again ...

[puipuitom]

5 hours ago, Tchooptip said:

Why I saw on al Jazeera the court cut the land in three giving 2/3 to Hindus and 1/3 to Muslims ? Fake news?

THAT would be a by far mor just decission... 

[puipuitom]

What I never could understand: why the omny-powerful Gods need US, mortals, to fulfill their demands ? 

Why the God Ram cannot clean up the place to worship him or Allah defend the place for worship to Him ?

Edited November 10, 2019 by puipuitom

[olfu]

All religions must be private matter.

[mfd101]

*Deleted post edited out*

 

Too much history is what causes many wars - Ulster, Punjab, Serbia ... People living in the past.

 

And Putin has, on at least one occasion, spoken publicly of "My predecessor Peter the Great". For goodness' sake, Liz II might as well stand up and talk about 'My predecessor Henry II [or Henry V]', prior to reinvading France.

[stevenl]

18 minutes ago, mfd101 said:

Too much history is what causes many wars - Ulster, Punjab, Serbia ... People living in the past.

 

And Putin has, on at least one occasion, spoken publicly of "My predecessor Peter the Great". For goodness' sake, Liz II might as well stand up and talk about 'My predecessor Henry II [or Henry V]', prior to reinvading France.

Weak, cop out, not related to my comment, and in the mean time the poster the question was asked to hasn't answered.

[Sujo]

20 hours ago, daoyai said:

The muslems gotta be sharpening their daggers over this one ...stay tuned.

And if the Hindis lost the case then their knives would be sharpened. Considering the OP stated the mosque was burnt to the ground before.

[Scott]

Off-topic, troll posts and replies removed.  

 

[Tchooptip]

23 hours ago, puipuitom said:

THAT would be a by far mor just decission... 

 Yes but I was wrong, I understood later it was a judgment by a lower court in 2010, recently that is to say a few days ago, it was given totally to the Hindus by the supreme court and the Muslims received a land of rather the same size to build a new mosk elsewhere.