Jump to content

Republicans want Hunter Biden, whistleblower to testify in open hearings


rooster59

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Tippaporn said:

Back up that claim with evidence, Chomper, or recant.  That the call transcript was doctored by the White House is a bona fide lie.

See witness statements. Not a lie, fact.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

When this "scandal" blew open all the Trump haters were in support of hearsay.  What happened, Sujo?

 

As to whether the identity of the whistle blower is relevant I will guarantee that there are law makers who understand accurately the relevancy.  He may also very well be one of the players involved in the Russia hoax.  Who is Charlie?

 

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1182481078159851520.html

More drivel from fringe (and I'm being very polite here) sources.

 

"Who is Charlie?"

Je suis Charlie!

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

It's absolutely not relevant. The impeachment inquiry is about Trump's wrong-doing. Allegations of wrong-doing by others, even if they were true, are totally irrelevant.

 

It's like a person accused of a burglary going into court and saying, "Yeah, but what about this other guy I know? He broke into someone's else's house." 

 

If there were any prima facie evidence that either of the Bidens did anything illegal (there isn't) it should be investigated by the FBI/DOJ and if there's help needed from a foreign government, the State Dept should liaise with them.

 

It's entirely inappropriate (and as we're seeing, potentially impeachable conduct) for a President to unilaterally decide to extort a foreign leader into investigating a political rival.

If there were any prima facie evidence that either of the Bidens did anything illegal (there isn't) . . . 

 

Utter BS.  And this lie is endlessly repeated by Trump haters, fed by the MSM as conspiracy theory.  Plenty of evidence.  I'm not linking to everything that's available.  And there's a lot.

 

https://johnsolomonreports.com/testimony-bombshell-obama-administration-tried-to-partner-with-hunter-bidens-ukrainian-gas-firm-but-was-blocked-over-corruption-concerns/

 

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story

 

Burisma rep Bluestar name dropping Hunter Biden for access to the State Department.

 

https://www.scribd.com/document/433389210/Bluestar-Novelli-Contacts

 

Burisma Consultant Contacted State Department Over Hunter Biden Concerns: Emails

 

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BobBKK said:

Ok try a different way. Why can't POTUS with hold the charity they give a country?  nothing wrong in using aid to get information on the ex-VP's cocaine loving son being on the board AND his father getting the prosecutor sacked (for AID). Totally RELEVANT.

Well he is now known for withholding charity so there’s that. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Becker said:

And still Trump's favorite pet Barr does nothing about it? Yes sure, highly likely and hugely credible.

Anyone of you base Trump supporters ever heard of "critical thinking"?

Of course he does nothing. Now the Trump camp can keep on pointing at the democrats, MSM, biden, etc. After an investigation all that would be left is 'oops'.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Of course he does nothing. Now the Trump camp can keep on pointing at the democrats, MSM, biden, etc. After an investigation all that would be left is 'oops'.

Durham criminal investigation will 'shock the conscience and soul of the nation'

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/sean-hannity-durham-criminal-investigation-will-shock-the-conscience-and-soul-of-the-nation

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/italian-australian-officials-defend-helping-barr-in-review-of-russia-probes-origins-11571953551

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/william-barr-and-john-durham-ask-uk-italy-and-australia-for-help-in-investigation-of-mueller-inquiry-origins

 

https://www.lawfareblog.com/justice-department-should-share-more-information-durham-investigation

 

Of course he does nothing.

 

More utter nonsense being spouted.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

Yes, no doubt Shokin says that. Does that make it true? His deputy says he's lying. The Ukrainian parliament says he's lying and corrupt. Anti Corruption NGO's in Ukraine say he's lying and corrupt. Do you have any knowledge of all of his disgraceful conduct as a prosecutor? And that statement of his was solicited by Giuliani in support of the corrupt oligarch Dmytro Firtash. Who held a massive grudge against Ambassador Yovanovitch and Joseph Biden because they dislodged him from his lucrative and corrupt position in the Ukrainian gas industry. And who is still trying to get back into it by pushing to dislodge the person who is now in charge and by all accounts is doing a great job in cleansing that part of the Ukrainian economy.

Yes, no doubt Shokin says that. Does that make it true?

 

Follow the facts.  Reportedly on the do-not-prosecute list provided to Yuriy Lutsenko.  I'm sure more facts will come to light.

 

Anti-Corruption Action Centre (AntAC)

 

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/435906-us-embassy-pressed-ukraine-to-drop-probe-of-george-soros-group-during-2016

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tippaporn said:

Yes, no doubt Shokin says that. Does that make it true?

 

Follow the facts.  Reportedly on the do-not-prosecute list provided to Yuriy Lutsenko.  I'm sure more facts will come to light.

 

Anti-Corruption Action Centre (AntAC)

 

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/435906-us-embassy-pressed-ukraine-to-drop-probe-of-george-soros-group-during-2016

Actually, more facts did come to light.

Are you aware that Lutsenko recanted about his "do not prosecute list?"

More tripe from John Solomon.

Once again Solomon is getting his information from Dmytro Firtash via his corrupt associates Parnas and Furman.

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

My post was about Barr and Durham, not Ukraine.  Solomon was not used in any of the sources I provided in that post.

 

Why are you people so deliberately dishonest?

You're right. I did post my evidence to the wrong post of yours. My mistake.

Your mistake is in using that dishonest journalist, John Solomon to support your case.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...