3 hours ago, Crazy Alex said:

Oh I don't know. Rachel Maddow released portions of Trump's taxes. It was a massive flop. Frankly, most of what I've seen Democrats think they'll find indicates they don't even understand tax returns and what is and isn't on them.

If there was nothing there Trump would have been waving them around like a clean pair of underwear.

Just now, SheungWan said:

If there was nothing there Trump would have been waving them around like a clean pair of underwear.

Not really. He's been masterfully baiting (pun intended) Democrats for years. It's the same old trap every time. Trump sets the bait. Democrats take it. Trump reels them in. Democrats fight violently and make a big deal. The original issue fizzles out. Democrats look like idiots making much ado about nothing.

Just now, Crazy Alex said:

What has been covered up?

isn't that the same innocent question asked by Trump supporters over the little matter of the Ukraine impeachable offences?

1 minute ago, SheungWan said:

isn't that the same innocent question asked by Trump supporters over the little matter of the Ukraine impeachable offences?

After an intense investigation, Trump has been acquitted.

Just now, Crazy Alex said:

Not really. He's been masterfully baiting (pun intended) Democrats for years. It's the same old trap every time. Trump sets the bait. Democrats take it. Trump reels them in. Democrats fight violently and make a big deal. The original issue fizzles out. Democrats look like idiots making much ado about nothing.

Nothing there: ????

Just now, Crazy Alex said:

After an intense investigation, Trump has been acquitted.

Intense blocking of witnesses.

Just now, SheungWan said:

Nothing there: ????

That's right. Nothing there. The justice system has spoken. Trump has been acquitted. It's over. From here on out, Democrats will look silly and petty chasing phantom Russian conspiracies and other nonsense.

1 minute ago, SheungWan said:

Intense blocking of witnesses.

In the House? Yep. I agree. Fortunately, the Senate proceedings were just as fair as those in the House.

Oh my!  Romney's press secretary from 2012 ripped into him pretty good.

 

Rick Gorka:

"I believe Mitt Romney is motivated by bitterness and jealously . . ."

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/481705-former-romney-campaign-spokesman-says-impeachment-decision-is-motivated-by

2 hours ago, Ricohoc said:

Oh my!  Romney's press secretary from 2012 ripped into him pretty good.

 

Rick Gorka:

"I believe Mitt Romney is motivated by bitterness and jealously . . ."

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/481705-former-romney-campaign-spokesman-says-impeachment-decision-is-motivated-by

A very bitter and vindictive sod,a true has been and never was been!  Mr. Trump proved this swamp creature,Washington politician wrong! Be interesting to see how he votes for bills coming up!

 

 

Edited February 8, 20206 yr by riclag

A TDS troll post and the replies have been removed.

 

Some off topic posts and the replies have been removed. 

9 hours ago, Ricohoc said:

Oh my!  Romney's press secretary from 2012 ripped into him pretty good.

 

Rick Gorka:

"I believe Mitt Romney is motivated by bitterness and jealously . . ."

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/481705-former-romney-campaign-spokesman-says-impeachment-decision-is-motivated-by

I've had a feeling this was the issue. I believe Romney felt very embarrassed when Trump pointed out that Romney came to Trump begging for his endorsement.

Edited February 8, 20206 yr by Crazy Alex

22 hours ago, Ricohoc said:

Oh my!  Romney's press secretary from 2012 ripped into him pretty good.

 

Rick Gorka:

"I believe Mitt Romney is motivated by bitterness and jealously . . ."

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/481705-former-romney-campaign-spokesman-says-impeachment-decision-is-motivated-by

Yeah, you and all the other Trump-worshippers are out there blasting Romney for doing the right thing which has no political benefit to himself.  What Romney did is pretty darn rare for a politician, especially a Republican.

 

I watched a Dem Senator saying that he wanted his own sons to grow up to be like Romney, a person of conviction and integrity.  Does anyone want their sons to be like Trump?  A lying cowardly conman?  Quite a contrast.

On 2/8/2020 at 1:54 AM, Crazy Alex said:

In the House? Yep. I agree. Fortunately, the Senate proceedings were just as fair as those in the House.

The house had witnesses. How many witnesses in the senate trial.

On 2/8/2020 at 1:53 AM, Crazy Alex said:

That's right. Nothing there. The justice system has spoken. Trump has been acquitted. It's over. From here on out, Democrats will look silly and petty chasing phantom Russian conspiracies and other nonsense.

What justice system. It was never involved.

20 hours ago, riclag said:

A very bitter and vindictive sod,a true has been and never was been!  Mr. Trump proved this swamp creature,Washington politician wrong! Be interesting to see how he votes for bills coming up!

 

 

Well there are about 300 bills waiting on mitchs desk that havent been dealt with. Could try that for a start.

4 minutes ago, Sujo said:

The house had witnesses. How many witnesses in the senate trial.

Don't you get tired of churning out the same old troll information? the House did not allow Trump a proper defence as they did Clinton and Dems pulled in 18 'witnesses' not one of which said they had seen him do anything wrong. Give it a REST you lost.

13 minutes ago, BobBKK said:

Don't you get tired of churning out the same old troll information? the House did not allow Trump a proper defence as they did Clinton and Dems pulled in 18 'witnesses' not one of which said they had seen him do anything wrong. Give it a REST you lost.

The house is an investigation, not a trial.

 

Clinton did not get investigated by the house, they only voted. Starr did the investigation.

 

There is evidence. Even repubs are saying he did wrong but not worthy of removal.

 

Trump could call witnesses, he just refused to call them, the ones with direct knowledge of his perfect call.

 

We all know why.

 

Interesting you dont like facts.

Edited February 9, 20206 yr by Sujo

27 minutes ago, Sujo said:

The house is an investigation, not a trial.

 

Clinton did not get investigated by the house, they only voted. Starr did the investigation.

 

There is evidence. Even repubs are saying he did wrong but not worthy of removal.

 

Trump could call witnesses, he just refused to call them, the ones with direct knowledge of his perfect call.

 

We all know why.

 

Interesting you dont like facts.

 

The investigation led to dismissal. That's how it works.

48 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Well there are about 300 bills waiting on mitchs desk that havent been dealt with. Could try that for a start.

 

Let the house put through meaningful legislation. We can rename libraries and streets later. Let the house introduce an infrastructure bill. Otherwise McConnell is correct the senate should use the time they have and prioritize confirming judges.

Edited February 9, 20206 yr by Cryingdick

36 minutes ago, Sujo said:

The house is an investigation, not a trial.

 

Clinton did not get investigated by the house, they only voted. Starr did the investigation.

Mueller investigated Trump, for years. Nothing. So the house investigated on their own. Nothing. And you complain about him being acquitted?

1 hour ago, Sujo said:

The house had witnesses. How many witnesses in the senate trial.

Seventeen witnesses in the Senate trial. 
 

1 hour ago, Sujo said:

Well there are about 300 bills waiting on mitchs desk that havent been dealt with. Could try that for a start.

Unless the bills are cutting regulations, I’d rather they just focus on getting more judges seated. 
 

35 minutes ago, rabas said:

Mueller investigated Trump, for years. Nothing. So the house investigated on their own. Nothing. And you complain about him being acquitted?

Yes, but remember, the only reason they did not find anything is because Trump‘s obstruction. 
 

Keep in mind, there is never any accountability on the left, they just move to the next hysteria. 
 

 

6 hours ago, mogandave said:

Seventeen witnesses in the Senate trial. 
 

I missed them giving evidence in the trial.

5 hours ago, mogandave said:

Yes, but remember, the only reason they did not find anything is because Trump‘s obstruction. 
 

Keep in mind, there is never any accountability on the left, they just move to the next hysteria. 
 

 

Plenty was found, even repubs say he did wrong.

6 hours ago, rabas said:

Mueller investigated Trump, for years. Nothing. So the house investigated on their own. Nothing. And you complain about him being acquitted?

Mueller found collusion but considered trump jr and friends too dumb to know so couldnt bring it to a conspiracy to be a crime.

Mueller also found other evidence of wrongdoing but said a president cannot be charged with any crime so instead said that he could not clear him.

 

There was also a lot of money returned and a few people in jail that would contradict your opinion.

7 hours ago, BobBKK said:

Don't you get tired of churning out the same old troll information? the House did not allow Trump a proper defence as they did Clinton and Dems pulled in 18 'witnesses' not one of which said they had seen him do anything wrong. Give it a REST you lost.

America lost. 

7 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

 

Let the house put through meaningful legislation. We can rename libraries and streets later. Let the house introduce an infrastructure bill. Otherwise McConnell is correct the senate should use the time they have and prioritize confirming judges.

Many of the bills are bipartisan. Sitting waiting.

1 hour ago, Gweiloman said:

America lost. 

Yes and Putin won.