Jump to content

FFW opposes court's decision on requested hearing


webfact

Recommended Posts

FFW opposes court's decision on requested hearing 

By The Nation

 

800_ff839b025a9adf7.jpg?v=1580991619

Piyabutr Saengkanokkul in the middle.

 

Future Forward Party (FFW) secretary-general Piyabutr Saengkanokkul disagreed with the Constitutional Court's decision not to allow a hearing in which it planned to present to the court the Election Commission's documents and only request written testimony from 17 EC officials who deemed the party not guilty of the accusation.

 

He said in a press conference on Thursday (February 6) that the Election Commission allegedly filed the documents to two subcommittees of inquiry and investigation. According to the law, such an act is prohibited and the procedure should be ceased but the EC continued with the case regardless, he said. 

 

Meanwhile, FFW has not been given an opportunity to present an explanation even though the party’s situation differed from that stated in the accusation, Piyabutr said.

 

Moreover, the court ruling was delivered on February 4, three days before the censure debate, meaning that FFW could have been dissolved by then and the government would benefit from it. 

 

FFW still believes in justice and would fight the dissolution of the party, Piyabutr said.

 

However, should the effort fail, FFW’s MPS will make sure that the censure debate take place since the information it prepared have yet to be presented to the media and might lead to the government losing its legitimacy, he said.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30381708

 

nation.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2020-02-07
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, webfact said:

According to the law, such an act is prohibited and the procedure should be ceased but the EC continued with the case regardless, he said. 

As this case is against Mr P's strongest opposition, the fact that the act is prohibited is irrelevant, and the process to dissolve the F.F.P. will continue.

Democracy ? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webfact said:

....might lead to the government losing its legitimacy,

That statement alone lacks a certain sense of legitimacy.   It is painfully obvious this government rules by fear, not on any sort of mandate that is good for the Thai people.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...