Pareena confident she's not guilty in defamation case

By THE NATION

 

 

Phalang Pracharath Party Ratchaburi MP Pareena Kraikup reported to the Criminal Court today (February 17) to give testimony in a defamation case brought by Future Forward party-list MP and spokeswoman Pannika Wanich.

 

Pareena had claimed in a Facebook post that Future Forward leader Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit and Pannika were allegedly involved in bomb incidents in several areas of Bangkok and the unrest in three southern provinces, prompting Pannika to sue her for defamation under Sections 326 and 328 of the Criminal Law.

 

After reporting to the court today, Pareena told the press she was “100 per cent confident that she was not guilty and would neither seek reconciliation nor any settlement”.

 

She added that she would hold a press conference at Phalang Pracharath Party headquarters tomorrow.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30382273

 

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2020-02-17

Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking Thailand news and visa info

7 minutes ago, webfact said:

After reporting to the court today, Pareena told the press she was “100 per cent confident that she was not guilty and would neither seek reconciliation nor any settlement”.

My god this woman is completely vulgar. Proper trash. Sad to think that she's supposed to be representing and helping members of the public. 

Part of the governing party,so well may be found not guilty.

regards worgeordie

Why bother with the farce of going to court?

She is 1 of the bunch of cronies, so the judgement is a foregone conclusion, not guilty.

She is a very, very nasty piece of work and I hope she gets everything she so justly deserves. If there is karma, baby you are going to pay one day.

Edited February 17, 20206 yr by BobBKK

Isn't that the very same high-standing member of society who not so long ago claimed she was “100 per cent confident that she was not guilty" regarding her by now judicially confirmed illegal encroachment on national forest land for her chicken farm?

 

My, my, some people are truly brimming with "100% confidence", it almost borders on a miracle.

Edited February 17, 20206 yr by Misterwhisper

We don’t need a court ruling to pass judgement on her. Just look at the facts.

17 hours ago, webfact said:

Pareena told the press she was “100 per cent confident that she was not guilty

She was spreading fake news .

Isn't there a law and punishment against this ?

I do not believe anybody saying " 100% sure " .

2 hours ago, nobodysfriend said:

She was spreading fake news .

Isn't there a law and punishment against this ?

I do not believe anybody saying " 100% sure " .

News is only deemed 'fake' if it affects the ruling party.

Edited February 18, 20206 yr by rwill

19 hours ago, rkidlad said:

My god this woman is completely vulgar. Proper trash. Sad to think that she's supposed to be representing and helping members of the public. 

Not to forget her role on the anti-corruption body!

 

 

If it is clear and the evidence unretractable that she did indeed post something as the sort, she will be found guilty and then put on a suspended 2 year sentence not going to jail. I find her to be cute. If I wasn't married I would like to play with her.

This lady appears to have quite a long neck for a lady????

18 hours ago, BobBKK said:

She is a very, very nasty piece of work

I've seen worse in some 'red light districts' in Thailand. 

 

17 hours ago, Misterwhisper said:

Isn't that the very same high-standing member of society who not so long ago claimed she was “100 per cent confident that she was not guilty" regarding her by now judicially confirmed illegal encroachment on national forest land for her chicken farm?

 

My, my, some people are truly brimming with "100% confidence", it almost borders on a miracle.

'100% confident' means;- "I have paid the requested brown envelope consultancy fee and had confirmation of my innocence". 555 ????????????????

52 minutes ago, holy cow cm said:

If it is clear and the evidence unretractable that she did indeed post something as the sort, she will be found guilty and then put on a suspended 2 year sentence not going to jail. I find her to be cute. If I wasn't married I would like to play with her.

So you up for a game of Tik Tak Toe or Snakes & Ladders?  Me, I'd be doing things to her that would shock my dear old granny......but then again......granny had 9 kids so my assumption about Dear old granny maybe based more on fantasy than fact! 

Edited February 18, 20206 yr by Grumpy John
Smeling

Another Hi So proudly claiming ownership both of land reserved for the poor , and Public Land ( 46 rai of National Park). I simply cannot stand this kind of greed...

"She was also found to own a 691-rai plot in an area reserved for poor farmers under the land reform policy governed by the Agricultural Land Reform Office (Alro)."

 

3 hours ago, nobodysfriend said:

She was spreading fake news .

Isn't there a law and punishment against this ?

I do not believe anybody saying " 100% sure " .

I'm 100% sure you are correct.

1 hour ago, Grumpy John said:

So you up for a game of Tik Tak Toe or Snakes & Ladders?

Snakes and ladders? Isn't that when you climb all over her and hide the serpent?