Nauseus, It is not a question of not accepting your point of view. You and others continually say that the reason that Brexit has not delivered the promised economic benefits is because it was not implemented corrected. I simply ask you to elaborate on this point and explain what this difference implementation would look like in practice. To date, you have been unwilling or unable to do so. The economic argument is central to the Brexit discussion so I don't see how it can be disregarded, however notwithstanding that fact, how have we (the UK) benefitted in practical terms by regaining our 'lost' sovereignty? Imo many Brexiters had an unrealistic vision of the UK's position in a post-Brexit 21st century world. There was a yearning for - and a belief that? - a Britain which would regain its' position on the world stage and, once again, project power, just as we did in the 19th and first half of the 20th century. Whether that was/ would be a good or bad thing is irrelevant; it is a Britain that no longer exists and will not exist again. The concept of sovereignty is a myth: Sure, we can now have as many bendy bananas as we want, but the truth of the matter is that in 2026, the UK is a rule-taker and not a rule-maker. The US, China and the EU (probably in that order) are the world's economic, political and diplomatic superpowers. As the second or third most powerful individual member of the EU, the UK had a voice on the world stage; outside of it we are barely heard and we effectively do what the three major powers tell us to do.
