https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/ive-seen-donald-trump-without-37589270.amp

I've seen Donald Trump without make-up – he looks like an open can of Spam'

Mirror

3 hours ago

A former colleague who has seen Donald Trump without his make-up says "he looks like an open can of Spam" before applying his bronzer - but the president "thinks it looks fantastic"

You ever seen Amanda Holden without make-up?

Yes but he gets three cents for every can sold !

Why do leftists always attack people for the way they look?

47 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Why do leftists always attack people for the way they look?

After the fake narratives all turned to crap, what do they have left?

Gone from "hes a mass murderer who killed millions" to "he has bad skin"😅

MOA climbdowns? I think it is.

11 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

After the fake narratives all turned to crap, what do they have left?

Gone from "hes a mass murderer who killed millions" to "he has bad skin"😅

MOA climbdowns? I think it is.

Yeah, its' been the diapers for a month, but no evidence of that, and of course the box in his pants only leftists can see, he closed he eyes for a few seconds it's a new headline, and now his skin looks like Spam.

An 80-year-old man has bad skin, and it's newsworthy to the left.

The leftists generally petty know-nothings.

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Why do leftists always attack people for the way they look?

Of course, you would never attack a leftist for thinking wealth distribution has got out of hand. That would be hypocrisy, yes?

1 minute ago, Lacessit said:

Of course, you would never attack a leftist for thinking wealth distribution has got out of hand. That would be hypocrisy, yes?

I think it's fine to attack people's policy positions, but I think calling them ugly and fat and whatnot is childish. It's what schoolyear bully's do.

For example, when you were regurgitation lies in another thread, I corrected your lies, I did not attack your personally.

You think you should get more of other people's money, and you call them greedy if they don't want to give it to you. That is a personal attack, not a policy attack. What right do you have to other people's money?

36 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I think it's fine to attack people's policy positions, but I think calling them ugly and fat and whatnot is childish. It's what schoolyear bully's do.

For once I agree with you.

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Why do leftists always attack people for the way they look?

It is hardly only the leftist that do that, is it? Actually, I don't recall any leftist president that has done that, on the other hand, Trump ...

9 hours ago, farang51 said:

For once I agree with you.

It is hardly only the leftist that do that, is it? Actually, I don't recall any leftist president that has done that, on the other hand, Trump ...

I do not remember any president other than Trump doing it, but why does that give everyone a pass to do it?

I hate the crap Trump spews, but in all fairness, he generally does not start it.

11 hours ago, Lacessit said:

Of course, you would never attack a leftist for thinking wealth distribution has got out of hand. That would be hypocrisy, yes?

Wealth is earned, not 'distributed'.

31 minutes ago, emptypockets said:

Wealth is earned, not 'distributed'.

Not per the left.

40 minutes ago, emptypockets said:

Wealth is earned, not 'distributed'.

A misunderstanding which might explain your empty pockets.

9 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Not per the left.

Not per the nepo babies.

12 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Not per the nepo babies.

That's what I said

32 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

A misunderstanding which might explain your empty pockets.

Difficult to keep real estate and share market investments in one's pocket.

12 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I think it's fine to attack people's policy positions, but I think calling them ugly and fat and whatnot is childish. It's what schoolyear bully's do.

For example, when you were regurgitation lies in another thread, I corrected your lies, I did not attack your personally.

You think you should get more of other people's money, and you call them greedy if they don't want to give it to you. That is a personal attack, not a policy attack. What right do you have to other people's money?

You mean if someone calls a reporter "piggy"?Yes childish at least! it is not only schoolyard bullies who do this,some peoples heroes are on the same level.

1 minute ago, jvs said:

You mean if someone calls a reporter "piggy"?Yes childish at least! it is not only schoolyard bullies who do this,some peoples heroes are on the same level.

No, that's not what I meant. What I said was: I think it's fine to attack people's policy positions, but I think calling them ugly and fat and whatnot is childish. It's what schoolyear bully's do.

For example, when you were regurgitation lies in another thread, I corrected your lies, I did not attack your personally.

You think you should get more of other people's money, and you call them greedy if they don't want to give it to you. That is a personal attack, not a policy attack. What right do you have to other people's money?

20 minutes ago, emptypockets said:

Difficult to keep real estate and share market investments in one's pocket.

Interestingly unless you do any work to improve real estate you own, then no wealth created by owning it is derived from your work, holding stocks/shares is again not work.

Thank you for two examples of wealth being created other than by the work of the individual accumulating the wealth created.

Edited August 26Aug 26 by Chomper Higgot

14 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Interestingly unless you do any work to improve real estate you own, then no wealth created by owning it is derived from your work, holding stocks/shares is again not work.

Thank you for two examples of wealth being created other than by the work of the individual accumulating the wealth created.

How do you define work?

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I do not remember any president other than Trump doing it, but why does that give everyone a pass to do it?

I hate the crap Trump spews, but in all fairness, he generally does not start it.

He is the president, as a president he sets the tone. Both for his followers and his opponents. Mind you, the leaders of his opponents do not go that low, it is mostly ordinary people that follow his examples.

He starts it every time! None of the politicians he has called cow, horse face etc. has called him anything like that. None of the journalists has replied to his personally insults when they do their job. None of the disabled has publicly made fun of him. He is simply the worst kind of bully and it is disheartening to see religious people treat him like a messiah and that people that used to praise themselves for high moral standards, like many conservatives used to do, defend everything he does.

39 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

How do you define work?

Oh gawd he’s off on his impersonation of a three year old again.

I think that is rather disparaging to SPAM ,why can't the World see what Donald

actually looks like without make up, how long in the morning does it take to

apply the coating, brush over his hair, put a new diaper on, and is Natalie doing

all this for him, because I am sure Melania is not doing those duties...

We need to see Trump when he gets out of bed in the morning ,so MAGA can

see he is not the macho man that he likes to portray ,an Emperor has no clothes

moment...

regards Worgeordie

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Oh gawd he’s off on his impersonation of a three year old again.

That's what I thought. When I tried to discuss income disparities with you after you stood up for someone that was lying about CEO compensation, you defined CEO as someone making hundreds of times as much as their employees.

I think it a good bet you never did an honest day's work in your life. You seem to spend your days bleating on about the rich and how unfair it is they are rich. Perhaps you should have worked a bit to sweeten up that public teat you seem so desperate for.

10 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

That's what I thought. When I tried to discuss income disparities with you after you stood up for someone that was lying about CEO compensation, you defined CEO as someone making hundreds of times as much as their employees.

I think it a good bet you never did an honest day's work in your life. You seem to spend your days bleating on about the rich and how unfair it is they are rich. Perhaps you should have worked a bit to sweeten up that public teat you seem so desperate for.

Now you switch to outright lies.

“you defined CEO as someone making hundreds of times as much as their employees”

I did no such thing.

Spend less times telling lies and less time imagining stuff:

10 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I think it a good bet you never did an honest day's work in your life. You seem to spend your days bleating on about the rich and how unfair it is they are rich. Perhaps you should have worked a bit to sweeten up that public teat you seem so desperate for.

^ hogwash.

13 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Now you switch to outright lies.

“you defined CEO as someone making hundreds of times as much as their employees”

I did no such thing.

You did, and you know you did, and after you did you ran away,

13 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Spend less times telling lies and less time imagining stuff:

^ hogwash.

I doubt it. Like 90 percent of all the leftists here, you never admit to what you majored in and kind of work you did.

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

You did, and you know you did, and after you did you ran away,

I said no such thing, no amount of lies on your part will change the fact.

And you certainly won’t be posting a quote from me to back up your lie:

“you defined CEO as someone making hundreds of times as much as their employees”

5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I doubt it. Like 90 percent of all the leftists here, you never admit to what you majored in and kind of work you did.

This isn’t a dating site and I sure don’t want to make you feel inadequate.

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I said no such thing, no amount of lies on your part will change the fact.

And you certainly won’t be posting a quote from me to back up your lie:

“you defined CEO as someone making hundreds of times as much as their employees”

You said it, and you know you said it, and after you said it you ran away, you remember now, yes?

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

This isn’t a dating site and I sure don’t want to make you feel inadequate.

I'm sure that's it. I'm guessing you sold the family counsel house to a Tory too early.

36 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

You said it, and you know you said it, and after you said it you ran away, you remember now, yes?

I'm sure that's it. I'm guessing you sold the family counsel house to a Tory too early.

If I said something you’ll have no problem quoting me.

You can’t quote me on your lie ““you defined CEO as someone making hundreds of times as much as their employees”

You lied and you know you lied

Redeem yourself, simply say you were mistaken , or you misremembered.

Alternatively be known as a liar.

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

If I said something you’ll have no problem quoting me.

You can’t quote me on your lie ““you defined CEO as someone making hundreds of times as much as their employees”

You lied and you know you lied

Redeem yourself, simply say you were mistaken , or you misremembered.

Alternatively be known as a liar.

Oh, boo hoo, a leftist called me a liar, how will I ever move on from this?

You said it, and you know you said it, and after you said it you ran about

I know it, you know it, and everyone I care about knows it.

I don't know that you're never done an honest day's work, that was just a guess based on your seething hate for those that do. And like 90 percent of all the leftists here, you never admit to what you majored in and kind of work you did.