4 minutes ago, Logosone said:

Well you asked for the "real situation" before, you asked if he had been at Barnard Castle, and if he had that he should go.

 

Now Cummings has admitted he was at Barnard Castle, do you still feel he has to go?

 

Yes. Either he previously lied about that, or the PM did. 

 

Deliberately lying is a whole different ball game.

1 hour ago, BillStrangeOgre said:

Personally, i'd do whatever it takes to protect my child. A neighbour of mine in the UK has a daughter, a single parent with 3 toddlers, who couldn't charge her electric vehicle the cable was broken. My neighbour had a spare and drove a round trip of 90 miles to give it to her daughter through the kitchen window. 

My guess is there are millions of people in the UK in the past couple of months who had to make similar choices

 

A perfectly reasonable reason, covered in the rules.

Just now, Baerboxer said:

 

Yes. Either he previously lied about that, or the PM did. 

 

Deliberately lying is a whole different ball game.

He was also lying about his reason for going there and having a stroll by the riverside.

Just now, Baerboxer said:

 

A perfectly reasonable reason, covered in the rules.

Not covered by the rules. Cummings' caveat only applies to life threatening situations. His situation was nothing near that.

3 minutes ago, Logosone said:

Well you asked for the "real situation" before, you asked if he had been at Barnard Castle, and if he had that he should go.

 

Now Cummings has admitted he was at Barnard Castle, do you still feel he has to go?

He was in the town rather than the medieval fortification that gave it it's name. This somewhat changes the context IMO although not enough to appease the professionally outraged.

Just now, evadgib said:

He was in the town rather than the medieval fortification that gave it it's name. This somewhat changes the context IMO although not enough to appease the professionally outraged.

That only makes the offence worse.

14 minutes ago, hotandsticky said:

 

 

Please react to my post or refrain from my post or refrain from quoting.

3 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

A perfectly reasonable reason, covered in the rules.

...right, now add the fact she had a bit of a temperature and a cough when she drove the 90 mile round trip to deliver help to her daughter. Who wouldn't have done the same? 

12 minutes ago, Logosone said:

Well, that's not quite the full picture, because when the UK published its guidelines it allowed for an exception, which was "reasonable excuse".

 

It did not define "reasonable excuse".

 

Whether Cummings broke the actual guidelines depends on how "reasonable excuse" is defined.

 

Cummings made the case that his situation was "reasonable excuse". 

 

Other have argued that only risk to life would have been reasonable excuse. 

 

It's not clear, because the UK government did not publish clear guidelines.

 

Did Cummings have reasonable excuse? One can argue it to death. Did he break lockdown? He certainly did.

 

I posted the BBC's explanation of the rules covering reasonable excuses. It lists examples but stresses the list is not exhaustive.

 

As an example, Scotland's former chief medical officer made two trips, offered no reasonable excuses, and didn't self quarantine on either, as required. Even then her boss said at first she needn't resign but quickly changed her mind.

 

There are 4 Labour MP's who broke the rules:

 

1. MP Stephen Kinnock, a shadow Minister, drove hundreds of miles, with his wife, a former PM of Denmark, to see his elderly parents during lockdown. His local police force shamed him.

2. MP Kevan Jones, attended a constituents’ birthday party.

3.MP Tahir Ali attended a funeral in his constituency as one of 100 mourners at the start of April.

4. Labour’s Health Secretary in Wales, Vaughn Gething, had a picnic with his family in a park at a time when the Welsh Government he sits on explicitly said “No picnics in the park.”

 

None of the above have been pursued by the press. None have apologized or shown any remorse. Sir Keir Starmer, Labour Leader, has not comments on them, rebuked them or suggested they resign. Even though they are far more accountable to the public as elected servants for their behavior.

 

If Cummings deliberately lied about breaking the quarantine when he was in Durham, he should go. 

 

But these 4 Labour politicians, who clearly think they can do as they please, must also be made to go.

 

The law, rules, guidelines and acceptable behavior codes must apply to all equally. And not selectively based on their political affiliations. 

 

 

12 minutes ago, evadgib said:

He was in the town rather than the medieval fortification that gave it it's name. This somewhat changes the context IMO although not enough to appease the professionally outraged.

 

It was specifically stated that he strictly observed the 14 days quarantine with relatives leaving provisions at the door. 

 

If he now changes the story, his credibility has gone, he lied and he must no go.

14 minutes ago, Phil McCaverty said:

Not covered by the rules. Cummings' caveat only applies to life threatening situations. His situation was nothing near that.

 

No it doesn't. Read the actual rules.

17 minutes ago, Phil McCaverty said:

He was also lying about his reason for going there and having a stroll by the riverside.

 

Lying cannot be accepted, and he must go.

 

And then you agree, so must the 4 Labour MP's who broke the rules very clearly?

8 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

I posted the BBC's explanation of the rules covering reasonable excuses. It lists examples but stresses the list is not exhaustive.

 

As an example, Scotland's former chief medical officer made two trips, offered no reasonable excuses, and didn't self quarantine on either, as required. Even then her boss said at first she needn't resign but quickly changed her mind.

 

There are 4 Labour MP's who broke the rules:

 

1. MP Stephen Kinnock, a shadow Minister, drove hundreds of miles, with his wife, a former PM of Denmark, to see his elderly parents during lockdown. His local police force shamed him.

2. MP Kevan Jones, attended a constituents’ birthday party.

3.MP Tahir Ali attended a funeral in his constituency as one of 100 mourners at the start of April.

4. Labour’s Health Secretary in Wales, Vaughn Gething, had a picnic with his family in a park at a time when the Welsh Government he sits on explicitly said “No picnics in the park.”

 

None of the above have been pursued by the press. None have apologized or shown any remorse. Sir Keir Starmer, Labour Leader, has not comments on them, rebuked them or suggested they resign. Even though they are far more accountable to the public as elected servants for their behavior.

 

If Cummings deliberately lied about breaking the quarantine when he was in Durham, he should go. 

 

But these 4 Labour politicians, who clearly think they can do as they please, must also be made to go.

 

The law, rules, guidelines and acceptable behavior codes must apply to all equally. And not selectively based on their political affiliations. 

 

 

Good point.

 

Cummings was not elected to be a representative of the people. Members of Parliament are.

18 minutes ago, evadgib said:

He was in the town rather than the medieval fortification that gave it it's name. This somewhat changes the context IMO although not enough to appease the professionally outraged.

I agree.

 

If that is a true account, it does present different circumstances.

 

I suspect Cummings told the truth on that, because he admitted he saw one person, if he had gone on a full on leisure trip more than one person would have seen him.

10 minutes ago, Phil McCaverty said:

That only makes the offence worse.

Legally it remains far from clear whether any has occurred. It's a non-story. There has probably been a few porkies but there's no way this should have distracted HMG to the point where they're hosting a version of 'Mastermind' in the back garden of No 10.

18 minutes ago, BillStrangeOgre said:

...right, now add the fact she had a bit of a temperature and a cough when she drove the 90 mile round trip to deliver help to her daughter. Who wouldn't have done the same? 

Those who felt that the government instructions applied to them?

13 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

It was specifically stated that he strictly observed the 14 days quarantine with relatives leaving provisions at the door. 

 

If he now changes the story, his credibility has gone, he lied and he must no go.

Agreed, but I cannot see how HMG could get rid of him without appearing to have succumbed to MSMs mob-rule.

5 minutes ago, evadgib said:

Legally it remains far from clear whether any has occurred. It's a non-story. There has probably been a few porkies but there's no way this should have distracted HMG to the point where they're hosting a version of 'Mastermind' in the back garden of No 10.

I agree with you here - in isolation, it is a trivial matter that does not merit the attention it is receiving. However, within the context of the lockdown, people are justifiably outraged at his claim for special circumstances. I am sure that most people will agree that his circumstances were not exceptional; in fact, they were incredibly mild and mundane compared the real difficulties and sacrifices people made up and down the country. 

 

Contrast his selfish, arrogant behaviour with that of the parents of the 13 year old boy who died alone in hospital - and who was later buried alone. That is why people are angry.

18 hours ago, YetAnother said:

the roger stone of the UK

Fatuous comparison.You either know zilch about Roger Stone or zilch about Dominic Cummings - or perhaps nothing about either

Hold the front page.

 

Man drives to parents house, disobeys lockdown.

Punishable by £60 fine.

UK lib tards  in meltdown. 

Edited May 26, 20206 yr by twocatsmac

3 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

Those who felt that the government instructions applied to them?

...so your daughter, a single parent with 3 small children needs help and you as a parent refuse on the grounds you can't drive 90 miles with a slight temperature and a cough? What parent is going to refuse?

11 minutes ago, evadgib said:

There has probably been a few porkies but there's no way this should have distracted HMG to the point where they're hosting a version of 'Mastermind' in the back garden of No 10.

I agree, but it wouldn't have happened if Cummings hadn't ridden a coach and horses through his own rules. The distraction is all his doing.

2 hours ago, vogie said:

For once would it be possible for you to reply to a post without your usual patronization.

 

This may be a huge challenge, but try to stay even remotely in touch with reality.

 

You do read newspapers/etc don't you?

 

Why are your posts all written in the style of Citizen Smith and why all this anger all the time.

 

 

Fair enough. I should have said, "Please get your facts right". I realise that now the LP have a real leader with a brain, he is giving Boris a tough time. This has inspired numerous untrue or truth twisting attacks on him from the increasingly worried Tory tabloids, and the `Torygraph' who can see the writing on the distant wall.  Does this make me angry, yes indeed it does. I can think of times when I have defended Tory politicians when the press has been dishonest about them. Truth is important unless we want to live in a Trumpian world. 

 

Citizen Smith? Orson Wells I think, lost on me, I never watched it. 

He looks a bit like Dr Crippen.

46 minutes ago, Logosone said:

I agree.

 

If that is a true account, it does present different circumstances.

 

I suspect Cummings told the truth on that, because he admitted he saw one person, if he had gone on a full on leisure trip more than one person would have seen him.

I fail to see how the drive to Bernard Castle is reasonable excuse, going for a drive to see if fit to drive. 

The Barnard Castle episode is full of contradiction.

The instinct to protect his family involved driving 260m to be near family, but was prepared to place them in a car whilst he drove unsure of his fitness to drive.

The previous day he had seemed out medical expertise who had cleared him to return to work.Did this medical not include the apparent visual worries.

 

Edited May 26, 20206 yr by cleopatra2

34 minutes ago, evadgib said:

Agreed, but I cannot see how HMG could get rid of him without appearing to have succumbed to MSMs mob-rule.

Bulls Testicles, he should have gracefully gone ages ago
Just like the two before him
these are called precedents
which dont appear to matter to Cummings or those that went before him like A. Campbell Or P.Mandellson from Blairs Era unelected svengalis 
There should be a noticeon the door of No 10
Kindly leave your svengalis at the door

19 hours ago, Upnotover said:

Presumably he's got some dirt on Boris he won't hesitate to use if need be, looks the type.

We can only hope this is true

We Hope 
We pray
WE dance naked around campfires invoking ancient deities
We ask the 8 Ball

Please let it be so 

All you commoners just move along back to your homes. 
We elites have different rules.  You all can just <deleted> off and stop the whinger.  2 meters, masks, and shut up.

Apparently 52% of the population think Cummings should resign.

Surely the will of the people should be respected.

17 hours ago, BillStrangeOgre said:

allegedly took his wife to Barnhard castle...

No longer allegedly and with his 4 year old kid to test his eyesight. Didn't know that Dom sideline as a comedian - he should do  a Jeffery Archer and write fiction when he soon retires from the fray. ! You really couldn't make this stuff but he just did !

An inflammatory post has been removed