On 6/20/2020 at 7:40 AM, baansgr said:

Although they may spend 5 times the amount of sexpats..it doesn't create 5 times as many jobs which is what's needed most

 

7 hours ago, 4MyEgo said:

After all the sex he had at his fingertips on countless porn sets, and being paid for it, it appears he couldn't take a woman on his own and had to resort to rape. I have to say @ 67 he don't look good at all.

 

If the allegations are true, som nom nah.

Indeed, if the allegations are true.

It is also said he is rather rich.

I always get a funny feeling if accusations come years later.

2 hours ago, Saint Nick said:

Maybe I am not getting it, because I am not a native English- speaker or it is a "law"- term, but..."forcibly raped"?!

Is there any other way of rape?

Sex with anyone who is not in a position to give (or not give) consent - whether it be by being affected by drugs or alcohol, mental illness, or being a minor, is rape, no matter whether force is used or not.

Isn't he a BM on here?

Ron (the porn star version) appeared in something like 1,700+ porn movies alone.
From a 2007 article:
"Ron Jeremy’s phallus has made him what one trade magazine called the “top porn star of all time”; he has performed in more than 1,700 porn films with over 4,000 women"

He wasn't "huge" by industry standards, clocking in at around 9-9/12" apparently.

What producers/directors liked about him was his ability to "make it happen" on demand. So when the director called for the "money shot" - he didn't need an extra 10 minutes of "fluffing" to make it happen.

I'm always a little suspicious when people come out with claims like this, years after the event allegedly happened. It doesn't take the cops or prosecutors/DA's 3-4 years to investigate a case before bringing charges.
Or 6+ years as one incident supposedly happened in 2014.

Did he do it ? Maybe. Maybe not. I'm sure for someone who got as much @ss as he did over the years, "normal" probably got boring a long time ago.

By the same token, it wouldn't be the first time someone made a false accusation in the hopes of getting an "out of court settlement". Some people pay up just to make the story go away quicker as they know, even if they are innocent, people will believe the worst because that's more entertaining. And sells more copy.
 

16 minutes ago, ballpoint said:

Sex with anyone who is not in a position to give (or not give) consent - whether it be by being affected by drugs or alcohol, mental illness, or being a minor, is rape, no matter whether force is used or not.

You forgot the word 'woman' in your little rant ........ no court or police ever cared if I were drunk/drugged or suffering from 'mental illness' when they had sex with me.

Edited June 24, 20206 yr by BritManToo

1 hour ago, ballpoint said:

Sex with anyone who is not in a position to give (or not give) consent - whether it be by being affected by drugs or alcohol, mental illness, or being a minor, is rape, no matter whether force is used or not.

Ah...okay! Thanks for clearing that up for me!

7 hours ago, Oliver Holzerfilled said:

I had a part as an extra in a low budget film he was in.  It wasn't a porn flick.  I didn't see him on the set but spent some time around him at the release party.  He seemed a little creepy.  That being said I've run into many much creepier degenerate sex addicts in Thailand.  

So he did not filled your Holzer is asume? ????

Edited June 24, 20206 yr by terminatorchiangmai

How can anyone want to have sex with this creep `? 

I read somewhere he's a good friend of Randy Andy ????

2 hours ago, hansnl said:

 

Indeed, if the allegations are true.

It is also said he is rather rich.

I always get a funny feeling if accusations come years later.

A mate of mine met him in Vegas, he was living out of his car had a good laugh with him but said he wasn't in good shape felt sorry for him, so i dont think he is rich at all.

9 hours ago, Somtamnication said:

Hope spends a long and hard time away from home.

He is entitled to a trial and if found guilty is punished according to the law. The court of public opinion and hope does not constitute either.

What's the name of that West Hollywood Bar ?  He must be a good customer for them to keep letting him drink there.

So far only one side of the story is out.

9 hours ago, Pilotman said:

well I wouldn't cut 2 inches off mine for anyone. ????

Il have it pilot if it's going spare, I'm hung like a light switch...

11 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

Wow it's that old ugly guy who has been in every porn imaginable. He was always unattractive since the beginning of time. I always wondered how and why he got so many jobs.

He's so hairy that he's known as 'the hedgehog' in the industry.

14 hours ago, 4MyEgo said:

it appears he couldn't take a woman on his own and had to resort to rape.

Innocent until proven guilty. I'm not saying he's not guilty, I just think your comment is, well, just wrong to make.

Wait.

 

He met a woman in a bar in West Hollywood?

 

The Gay Capital of Los Angeles?

 

Maybe she "wasn't interested" for some strange reason? ????????????

 

17 hours ago, Oliver Holzerfilled said:

I had a part as an extra in a low budget film he was in.  It wasn't a porn flick.  I didn't see him on the set but spent some time around him at the release party.  He seemed a little creepy.  

Oh Lord! What is a release party? I'm conjuring images of a baby shower but that doesn't seem right either.  ????

If he wanted to get away with grabbing women with  impunity why did he not go to Patts. 

11 hours ago, AgMech Cowboy said:

Innocent until proven guilty. I'm not saying he's not guilty, I just think your comment is, well, just wrong to make.

Naturally your entitled to your opinion, as I am, however, when woman and others, children, males, start coming out from the shadows and start pointing the finger at celebrities, as they have done in the past, the most recent Harvey, past, Rolf Harris, Bill Crosby etc etc you have to think, innocent until proven guilty yes, but just a matter of time before my comment is right ????

 

he might get lots of ASS in the jail, but not the kind he likes

On 6/24/2020 at 4:54 PM, Benmart said:

He is entitled to a trial and if found guilty is punished according to the law. The court of public opinion and hope does not constitute either.

The court of public opinion seems to have a lot of clout, it seems, on the elected and chosen figures playing their parts in the US justice system.

On 6/24/2020 at 7:56 AM, faraday said:

Apparently, he was able to ejaculate on demand, & this 'skill' meant he was often used at the err...last moment, when the actor couldn't finish.

Thank you for those pearls of wisdom.

28 minutes ago, ratcatcher said:

Thank you for those pearls of wisdom.

Please don't give me a necklace.

 

????

On 6/24/2020 at 1:15 PM, Bohemianfish said:

Rape is about power and control. Must be what floats his boat. Romance and love are not there.

So you think he's guilty?

 

Supposed to have raped them in a bar- seriously?

 

Raped a 25 year old, a 33 and 46 year old, a 30 year old when he was over 60. Can't say I believe it when I look at that photo.

Sounds to me like the female thing of when something isn't to their satisfaction accusing the guy of something very bad. Just like we've seen before.

I'll never forget being told by a female manager that "ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS".