1 hour ago, Tippaporn said:

LOL.  I've personally witnessed corruption within the courts firsthand.  Go ahead and believe in "justice" as long as it favours your political persuasion.  Of course if it doesn't favour you (and I'm not talking about you here specifically, candide) then feel free to call out, in this instance William Barr, as a Trump henchman for dismissing the case.  Flip flop, flip flop . . . whatever suits the purpose.

 

I will guarantee that this case is going to the Supreme Court.  What is clear is that some people are absolutely desperate in silencing Flynn as he is not allowed to speak or write as long as this case is not settled.  Flynn knows too much.

 

I'll quote two lines from the above,

 

"I've personally witnessed corruption within the courts firsthand."

"I will guarantee that this case is going to the Supreme Court."

 

and start my comment with yet another:

 

"LOL."

 

Offering unverifiable personal anecdotes, who might not even be relevant to the topic is one way to make your point. Not a good one, but maybe good enough for the home crowd, considering how they gobble the President's nonsense. As for your personal guarantee? Meaningless. Your posts do not display particular in-depth knowledge about such matters, even disregarding the obvious partisanship. Moreover, given the many half-truths, alternative facts, hyper partisan comments etc. populating your contributions, why would such a "guarantee" be trusted anyway?

 

 

1 hour ago, Morch said:

I'll quote two lines from the above,

 

"I've personally witnessed corruption within the courts firsthand."

"I will guarantee that this case is going to the Supreme Court."

 

and start my comment with yet another:

 

"LOL."

 

Offering unverifiable personal anecdotes, who might not even be relevant to the topic is one way to make your point. Not a good one, but maybe good enough for the home crowd, considering how they gobble the President's nonsense. As for your personal guarantee? Meaningless. Your posts do not display particular in-depth knowledge about such matters, even disregarding the obvious partisanship. Moreover, given the many half-truths, alternative facts, hyper partisan comments etc. populating your contributions, why would such a "guarantee" be trusted anyway?

You're entire post is about one thing and one thing only . . . to trash my character.  Nothing in it addresses the topic of this thread.  I could report it but I won't.  I'd rather that people see you for what you are.

3 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

You're entire post is about one thing and one thing only . . . to trash my character.  Nothing in it addresses the topic of this thread.  I could report it but I won't.  I'd rather that people see you for what you are.

Forgive us if we dont believe anything you say without proof. Trump supporters accept it like that, others dont.

I guess after all he still has to go to jail, unless...unless Trump's pardon 555

https://www.yahoo.com/news/monumental-ruling-federal-appeals-court-163119644.html

In a monumental ruling, a federal appeals court denied Michael Flynn's motion to dismiss the DOJ's case against him

2 hours ago, Tippaporn said:

You're entire post is about one thing and one thing only . . . to trash my character.  Nothing in it addresses the topic of this thread.  I could report it but I won't.  I'd rather that people see you for what you are.

 

I was commenting on your posting style and "debate" tactics. As you resort to personal anecdotes and the like quite often, I thought it relevant to demonstrate that, once again, what you confidently offer is based on not much at all.

 

It is somewhat amusing that you cannot make your point, take offense when this is pointed out and cry foul about "trashing", only to continue and "trash" in turn.

This is only going in one direction.

 

An investigation into Barr’s interface in the course of justice.