1 minute ago, OneMoreFarang said:

It's up to the cameraman where he points the camera at and which zoom he uses.

This is one famous example of what might be shown and what might be cut out.

I'm not talking about pictures, do you understand the term 'live action'?

Just now, Jingthing said:

Well, we were warned. 

 

 

Good, they should ALL be sent to Gitmo for the rest of their miserable lives

3 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Tug will continue to repeat the "unmarked feds" lie long after it's been disproven.  The vehicles may be unmarked but that would be no different than unmarked police cars.

What is ludicrous is these hooded, masked ANTIFA people who hide in the crowds complaining police don't identify themselves.

 

You reap what you sow. 

4 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Tug will continue to repeat the "unmarked feds" lie long after it's been disproven.  The vehicles may be unmarked but that would be no different than unmarked police cars.

Because he only watches fake news 24/7 and has no clue about reality

4 hours ago, Tug said:

Un idenifyed troops in unmarked cars pulling American citizens practicing their FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS off the streets isent media spin it is an assault on our democracy and a distraction ploy by an failed administration 

 

distraction?  no, not at all.  it's a strategy.

 

sending in the stormtroopers will result in increased protests, resulting in more violence, resulting in 'justification' to send in more thugs, resulting in a more excited maga base.

 

funny thing though, i spent a lotta time with patriotic, constitution-loving, right to bare arms militia types (lived in texas, new mexico, arizona, idaho).  one of their big issues (then at least) was states rights, and preppin' for when the feds send in the jackbooted thugs to steal whats left of our liberties.  must be tough for them now.  cognitive dissonance is a real bitch.

Just now, Logosone said:

What is ludicrous is these hooded, masked ANTIFA people who hide in the crowds complaining police don't identify themselves.

 

You reap what you sow. 

The best thing is federal charges = huge unaffordable bail and long prison sentences. SWEET

2 minutes ago, Canuck1966 said:

Well Trump has no record of racist language or sniffing kid's hair

He's unfiltered and brash but he's holding the country together right now

Yes, the country is united...

 

Donald Trump has unified America – against him

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jul/19/donald-trump-presidential-election-joe-biden-coronavirus-pandemic

 

Just now, ChouDoufu said:

 

distraction?  no, not at all.  it's a strategy.

 

sending in the stormtroopers will result in increased protests, resulting in more violence, resulting in 'justification' to send in more thugs, resulting in a more excited maga base.

 

funny thing though, i spent a lotta time with patriotic, constitution-loving, right to bare arms militia types (lived in texas, new mexico, arizona, idaho).  one of their big issues (then at least) was states rights, and preppin' for when the feds send in the jackbooted thugs to steal whats left of our liberties.  must be tough for them now.  cognitive dissonance is a real bitch.

A post of absolute nonsense

They are being sent in because these terrorists are creating war zones. 

Trump is trying to help the people/families who are getting killed by these terrorists

1 minute ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Yes, the country is united...

 

Donald Trump has unified America – against him

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jul/19/donald-trump-presidential-election-joe-biden-coronavirus-pandemic

 

Hardly Trump's fault, more the extreme left escalating the division, as we saw with the violent protests.

3 minutes ago, Canuck1966 said:

I'm not talking about pictures, do you understand the term 'live action'?

Is it really too difficult for you to understand that it's up to the cameraman what he shows?

It does not matter if its pictures or live video.

We see what others record. And they record what they want to record.

Maybe there are 100 protesters from version A and 1000 from version B. What do we see? It depends on the cameraman!

5 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Is it really too difficult for you to understand that it's up to the cameraman what he shows?

It does not matter if its pictures or live video.

We see what others record. And they record what they want to record.

Maybe there are 100 protesters from version A and 1000 from version B. What do we see? It depends on the cameraman!

The whole world has seen the violence unleashed by the street thugs in the US. 

 

It's time the hammer came down. 

 

Hard.

6 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Is it really too difficult for you to understand that it's up to the cameraman what he shows?

It does not matter if its pictures or live video.

We see what others record. And they record what they want to record.

Maybe there are 100 protesters from version A and 1000 from version B. What do we see? It depends on the cameraman!

Well there are literally thousands of videos of marauding terrorists killing and maiming people, rioting, desecrating, pillaging, looting etc etc 

A highly inflammatory troll post has been removed

18 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Well, we were warned. 

 

 

Didn't trust her when she was in government and that hasn't changed.

16 minutes ago, Logosone said:

What is ludicrous is these hooded, masked ANTIFA people who hide in the crowds complaining police don't identify themselves.

 

You reap what you sow. 

You justify the behavior of Federal Officers on the basis of the behavior of private citizens who you repeatedly refer to as criminals.

 

Let’s make a list of countries that used paramilitary forces against their own citizens and look at what it lead to.

17 minutes ago, ChouDoufu said:

 

distraction?  no, not at all.  it's a strategy.

 

sending in the stormtroopers will result in increased protests, resulting in more violence, resulting in 'justification' to send in more thugs, resulting in a more excited maga base.

 

funny thing though, i spent a lotta time with patriotic, constitution-loving, right to bare arms militia types (lived in texas, new mexico, arizona, idaho).  one of their big issues (then at least) was states rights, and preppin' for when the feds send in the jackbooted thugs to steal whats left of our liberties.  must be tough for them now.  cognitive dissonance is a real bitch.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it isn't militia types destroying public property, is it? They have nothing to fear from this. The thugs should be scared though, and a good job too. Long overdue.

I know you ever-trumpers don't like it when grown-ups criticize the failure that is the trump "presidency" so I take pleasure in posting such things. 

 

 

Former Bush DHS secretary rips Trump for treating department like 'the president's personal militia'

Edited July 23, 20205 yr by Phoenix Rising

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

You justify the behavior of Federal Officers on the basis of the behavior of private citizens who you repeatedly refer to as criminals.

 

Let’s make a list of countries that used paramilitary forces against their own citizens and look at what it lead to.

Federal Officers did nothing wrong at all, unmarked vans. As the DHS head said, unmarked police cars are so common as to not even merit discussion. Whereas many of the protesters are indeed criminals.

 

And if ever there was a need to deploy troops to uphold US law the current time is it. 

 

Eisenhower sent federal troops to Little Rock to uphold US law. Trump needs to do it here.

 

 

18 minutes ago, Logosone said:

What is ludicrous is these hooded, masked ANTIFA people who hide in the crowds complaining police don't identify themselves.

 

You reap what you sow. 

Very good point.  They're blind to their own hypocrisy.  If a liberal and a conservative both perform an identical act the conservative will be derided while no mention will ever be made of the liberal.

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

She has a family history we could all learn from, particularly those advocating a State’s violence against its own citizens.

Oh please, every day every state uses violence "against its own people", if those people engage in criminal activity.

 

As many of the left have. They are criminals and as criminals they need to be dealt with.

 

 

Edited July 23, 20205 yr by Logosone

1 minute ago, Logosone said:

Federal Officers did nothing wrong at all, unmarked vans. As the DHS head said, unmarked police cars are so common as to not even merit discussion. Whereas many of the protesters are indeed criminals.

 

And if ever there was a need to deploy troops to uphold US law the current time is it. 

 

Eisenhower sent federal troops to Little Rock to uphold US law. Trump needs to do it here.

 

 

Once again, I suggest you acquaint yourself with the Constitution of the United States and the history of nations using paramilitary forces against their own citizens.

 

 

1 minute ago, Logosone said:

Oh please, every day every state uses violence "against its own people", if those people engage in criminal activity.

 

As many of the left have. They are criminals and as criminals they need to be dealt with.

 

 

Like I say, read the history first.

4 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it isn't militia types destroying public property, is it? They have nothing to fear from this. The thugs should be scared though, and a good job too. Long overdue.

 

it's cool when they come for "the other."

they won't come for me or mine, right?

we'll see how they feel about things later.

like maybe in november when "the other" gains the white house.

surely the new guy wouldn't try to grab muh guns!

for the children.

1 minute ago, Logosone said:

Oh please, every day every state uses violence "against its own people", if those people engage in criminal activity.

 

As many of the left have. They are criminals and as criminals they need to be dealt with.

 

 

Apparently it's OK to be  a thug and a criminal if one is on the correct side of politics.

 Acting DHS chief and former lobbyist with zero law enforcement experience Chad Wolf has exceeded by 180 days the legal amount of time anyone can serve in an Acting position without gaining Senate confirmation. Thus, any order he makes is technically illegal and he can be charged.

6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You justify the behavior of Federal Officers on the basis of the behavior of private citizens who you repeatedly refer to as criminals.

 

Let’s make a list of countries that used paramilitary forces against their own citizens and look at what it lead to.

New flash!!  The rioters, looters, vandals, arsonists, while being private citizens, through their own actions become criminals.

5 hours ago, Tug said:

Un idenifyed troops in unmarked cars pulling American citizens practicing their FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS off the streets isent media spin it is an assault on our democracy and a distraction ploy by an failed administration 

This argument about unmarked cars is a total lie. Every city, county, state have numerous unmarked cars. You see every day on the roads where unmarked cars are doing traffic. Investigators doing undercover work in community policing/ crime suppression. The FBI, DHS DOJ have never road around with big marking on their vehicles.

This argument about UNMARKED VEHICLES is so foolish. Either it is just out and out woke talking points or they are just totally ignorant about how LEO enforcement works.

As for the riots, less see, Portland had 51, I say again 51 days of routing with over 23 million dollars damage before the Federal LEO showed up to protect the Federal buildings.

 

The mayor and Governors are nothing but left wing woke politicians.

Trump puting federal troops in place in Democrat-run cities, more cities every month, and could use them to seize the mail-in votes at postal centers and election headquartrrs, ahem, 'to protect the integrity of the election and purge illegal votes', thereby blocking the election results for months, or even disqualifying the election itself. That would certainly allow the appointment of hundreds of additional conservative judges, likely a Supreme Court judge, and more lackeys throughout the government.

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Once again, I suggest you acquaint yourself with the Constitution of the United States and the history of nations using paramilitary forces against their own citizens.

 

 

I suggest you acquaint yourself with the provisions of 40 U.S. Code 1315, which under the Homeland Security Act of 2002 gives the department’s secretary the power to deputize other federal agents to assist the Federal Protective Service in protecting federal property, such as the courthouse in Portland.

 

Turns out Trump has the federal law authority to send in the DHS.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/17/us/politics/federal-agents-portland-arrests.html

 

I should look at history? Sure. What do I see, oh, Eisenhower sent in federal troops to uphold the law in Little Rock.

 

Okay then. Maybe you should study some history Chomper Higgot.

 

7 minutes ago, Logosone said:

Federal Officers did nothing wrong at all, unmarked vans. As the DHS head said, unmarked police cars are so common as to not even merit discussion. Whereas many of the protesters are indeed criminals.

 

And if ever there was a need to deploy troops to uphold US law the current time is it. 

 

Eisenhower sent federal troops to Little Rock to uphold US law. Trump needs to do it here.

 

 

You’ve yet to demonstrate even the vaguest understanding of the Constitution and civil rights abuses being perpetrated by these paramilitary groups.