An heiress, a judge and a job: France's Sarkozy goes on trial for corruption

By Richard Lough

 

FILE PHOTO: Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy arrives to attend the traditional annual ceremony at the Mont-Valerien, a memorial for the French who fought against the Nazis and those who were killed by the occupying forces, in Suresnes, west of Paris, France June 18, 2020. Ludovic Marin/Pool via REUTERS

 

PARIS (Reuters) - Former French president Nicolas Sarkozy goes on trial on Monday accused of trying to bribe a judge and of influence-peddling, one of several criminal investigations that threaten to cast an ignominious pall over his decades-long political career.

 

Prosecutors allege Sarkozy offered to secure a plum job in Monaco for judge Gilbert Azibert in return for confidential information about an inquiry into claims that Sarkozy had accepted illegal payments from L'Oreal heiress Liliane Bettencourt for his 2007 presidential campaign.

 

Sarkozy, who led France from 2007-2012 and has remained influential among conservatives, has denied any wrongdoing in all the investigations against him and fought vigorously to have the cases dismissed.

 

Investigators had from 2013 been wiretapping conversations between Sarkozy and his lawyer Thierry Herzog as they delved into allegations of Libyan financing in Sarkozy's 2007 campaign.

 

As they did, they learned that Sarkozy and his lawyer were communicating using mobile phones registered under false names. Sarkozy's phone was registered to a Paul Bismuth.

 

Prosecutors have said the wiretaps revealed that Sarkozy and Herzog had on multiple occasions discussed contacting Azibert, a magistrate at the Cour de Cassation, France's top appeals court for criminal cases, and well-informed on the Bettencourt inquiry.

 

They allege that Sarkozy offered to help Azibert get the Monaco job in return for insider help.

 

"Mr Azibert never got the job in Monaco," Sarkozy told BFM TV this month.

 

Herzog and Azibert are both on trial with Sarkozy, charged with corruption and influence-peddling. They are also accused of "violating professional secrecy". All three face up to 10 years in prison and hefty fines if convicted.

 

Sarkozy and his centre-right party Les Republicains have for years said the investigations against the former president are politically motivated.

 

Next March, Sarkozy is due in court on accusations of violating campaign financing rules during his failed 2012 re-election bid. The so-called "Bygmalion" case centres on accusations that Sarkozy's party worked with a friendly public relations firm to hide the true cost of his campaign.

 

Prosecutors are still investigating claims that Libya's former leader Muammar Gaddafi provided Sarkozy’s 2007 campaign with millions of euros shipped to Paris in suitcases - allegations that Sarkozy denies. His main accuser, a French-Lebanese businessman, withdrew his account of events this month.

 

(Reporting by Richard Lough; Editing by Hugh Lawson)

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-11-23

 

- Whatever you're going through, the Samaritans are here for you

- Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates

That behavior is probably pretty endemic throughout elite power politics.  I just wonder who in the billionaire class he angered seeing that he's getting tossed under the bus.
Need to throw a power elite against the wall occasionally in order to make the rest of the swamp creatures look clean and pristine by comparison.

Trump take note.  It can happen.

Al Jazira did a doco about him some time ago. Be good to see him get what he IMO deserves.

6 hours ago, cmarshall said:

Trump take note.  It can happen.

Can happen even to me...or you.

Beware the pen. It is so much mightier than the sword. Write an article, pepper it with lies and at best half truths and 40-60% of the people will believe it. Personally, IMO, that is exactly what this article is. Written by none other than a Reuters rumor writer.

9 hours ago, cmarshall said:

Trump take note.  It can happen.

Yes, it all sounds familiar of late......politically motivated investigations.... sounds like a standard playbook for has been leaders on their way out.

1 hour ago, car720 said:

One must consider just how much of the world Murdoch really controls.

IMO far too much.

Influence, sure, corruption, sure, neither of those would surprise me. But suitcases full of cash from Lybia, I have serious doubts about that.

On 11/23/2020 at 9:15 AM, connda said:

That behavior is probably pretty endemic throughout elite power politics.  I just wonder who in the billionaire class he angered seeing that he's getting tossed under the bus.
Need to throw a power elite against the wall occasionally in order to make the rest of the swamp creatures look clean and pristine by comparison.

 

Indeed.

 

Madame Lagarde was found guilty of corruption. But the judge let her off with no punishment as apparently is permissible under French law. Her reward - she got to be head of EU Central Bank!

 

So yeah, he must've seriously peed someone off, or made a vengeful enemy.

23 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Indeed.

 

Madame Lagarde was found guilty of corruption. But the judge let her off with no punishment as apparently is permissible under French law. Her reward - she got to be head of EU Central Bank!

 

So yeah, he must've seriously peed someone off, or made a vengeful enemy.

She was not found guilty of corruption but negligence. Not the same thing. In corruption you benefit from the deal in negligence you just did not do your job good. 

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38369822