Explainer: Why Indonesia is vaccinating its working population first, not elderly

By Stanley Widianto and Tabita Diela

 

FILE PHOTO: A medical worker stands inside a swab chamber as he prepares to collect swab samples to be tested for the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), as the outbreak continues in Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia, November 24, 2020. REUTERS/Willy Kurniawan

 

JAKARTA (Reuters) - As Indonesia prepares to begin mass inoculations against COVID-19, its plan to prioritise working age adults over the elderly, aiming to reach herd immunity fast and revive the economy, will be closely watched by other countries.

 

Several countries such as the United States and Britain that have already begun vaccinations are giving priority to elderly people who are more vulnerable to the respiratory disease.

 

The following are experts' views on merits and risks of the Indonesian approach, under which working age adults will be vaccinated after frontline health workers and public servants.

 

WHY 18-59 YEAR-OLDS FIRST?

 

Indonesia, which plans to begin mass inoculations with a vaccine developed by China's Sinovac Biotech, says it does not have enough data yet of the vaccine's efficacy on elderly people, as clinical trials underway in the country involves people aged 18-59.

 

"We're not bucking the trend," said Siti Nadia Tarmizi, a senior health ministry official, adding authorities would await recommendations from the country's drug regulators to decide on vaccination plans for the elderly.

 

While Britain and the United States began immunizations with a shot developed by Pfizer Inc and its partner BioNTech that showed it works well in people of all ages, Indonesia has initial access only to the Sinovac vaccine.

 

The Southeast Asian country has a deal to receive 125.5 million doses of Sinovac's CoronaVac shot, and a first batch of 3 million doses are already in the country.

 

Shipments of the Pfizer vaccine to the country are expected to begin from the third quarter, while a vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and Oxford University will start being distributed in the second quarter.

 

"I don't think anybody can get too dogmatic about what is the right approach," said Peter Collignon, professor of infectious diseases at Australian National University, adding that Indonesia's strategy could slow the spread of the disease, although it may not affect mortality rates.

 

"Indonesia doing it different to the U.S. and Europe is of value, because it will tell us (whether) you'll see a more dramatic effect in Indonesia than Europe or U.S. because of the strategy they're doing, but I don't think anybody knows the answer."

 

Professor Dale Fisher from the Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine at the National University of Singapore said he understood the rationale of Indonesia's approach.

 

"Younger working adults are generally more active, more social and travel more so this strategy should decrease community transmission faster than vaccinating older individuals," he said.

 

"Of course older people are more at risk of severe disease and death so vaccinating those has an alternative rationale. I see merit in both strategies."

 

WILL IT HELP ACHIEVE HERD IMMUNITY QUICKLY?

 

By vaccinating more socially mobile and economically active groups first, Indonesian government officials hope the government can quickly reach herd immunity.

 

Budi Gunadi Sadikin, Indonesia's health minister, said the country needs to vaccinate 181.5 million people, or roughly 67% of its population, to reach herd immunity, and requires almost 427 million doses of vaccines, assuming a double-dose regimen and a 15% wastage rate.

 

Some experts are skeptical about reaching herd immunity, as more research needs to be done to ascertain whether or not vaccinated people can transmit the virus.

 

"There could be the risk of people still capable of spreading the disease to the others," said Hasbullah Thabrany, chief of the Indonesian Health Economic Association.

 

WILL IT HELP ECONOMIC RECOVERY?

 

Economists have argued a successful vaccination programme covering around 100 million people will help jumpstart the economy, as they are more likely to resume economic activity such as spending and production.

 

Faisal Rachman, an economist with Bank Mandiri, said that the 18-59 age group has consumption needs that are higher than other groups.

 

"They could jack up the economic recovery faster because household consumption contributes more than 50% to Indonesia's economy," he said, warning that rising COVID-19 cases in the country could also risk lowering people's confidence.

 

The pandemic pushed Indonesia, Southeast Asia's largest economy, into its first recession in more than two decades last year, with the government estimating a contraction of as much as 2.2%.

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2021-01-04

 

- Whatever you're going through, the Samaritans are here for you

- Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates

Mmmm...very interesting and something someone was suggesting on another thread.

And no real loss to a country if more older people die, i know i'm one of the older people and the goverment would be happy to save paying my pension. 

 

This is not a bad idea, 19-59 the work force and the ones that are spreading it the most by traveling the most. I think we could learn a lot from this Indonesian plan especially when there are a lack of vaccines going around.

Good that different countries try different approaches, ultimately we will know what works best.

 

3 hours ago, Caldera said:

Good that different countries try different approaches, ultimately we will know what works best.

Assuming every country maintains full & accurate statistics on the same bases ...

7 hours ago, lockyv7 said:

And no real loss to a country if more older people die, i know i'm one of the older people and the goverment would be happy to save paying my pension. 

 

Average age of deaths from Covid in UK = 82

Average life expectancy in UK                   = 83

 

Conclusion: by vaccinating older people first we (may) be saving ONE year of life. And for many with dementia etc. is the quality of that year of life really worth it?

Either way countries decide to prioritize 60 yr olds are screwed. 

On 1/5/2021 at 9:18 AM, vandeventer said:

This is not a bad idea, 19-59 the work force and the ones that are spreading it the most by traveling the most. I think we could learn a lot from this Indonesian plan especially when there are a lack of vaccines going around.

The Indonesians are following China's approach.

China mocks West’s ‘elderly first’ vaccine plan as Beijing prioritises working population