Jump to content

Thai Rural Doctors Conclude COVID-19 Mass Testing Mission in Greater Bangkok


Recommended Posts

Posted

63b809f8bb4d030a8d364794265f59c9_small.jpeg

 

BANGKOK (NNT) - Thailand’s Rural Doctors Society (RDS) has completed its mission to help conduct COVID-19 mass testing on at least 50,000 people in 26 locations across Bangkok, Samut Prakan and Nakhon Pathom, with 10,357 people testing positive over the five-day period.

 

The RDS found that 10,357 people, of the 96,087 it tested between August 4th and 8th, had contracted COVID-19. Of those infected, 9,790 underwent RT-PCR testing. False results accounted for 0.55% of those tested while 70.2% exhibited few or no symptoms. Some 27.3% suffered moderate symptoms and 2.5% were severe cases.

 

RDS chairman Supat Hasuwannakit said that, in theory, keeping sufferers with mild symptoms in the home isolation program and sending the medium and critical cases to hospital might work well. The government must deploy enough people to conduct COVID-19 testing, as it helps remove the sick from those who are still healthy, which can keep the transmission in check.

 

He noted that the efficiency and speed with which the program can move could not keep pace with the rapid spread of the virus. The government must quickly add an additional 100,000 beds in hospitals to tackle shortages in response to the severity of the COVID-19 situation.

 

nnt.jpg
  • Thanks 1
Posted
20 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

Thailand’s Rural Doctors Society (RDS) has completed its mission to help conduct COVID-19 mass testing on at least 50,000 people in 26 locations across Bangkok, Samut Prakan and Nakhon Pathom, with 10,357 people testing positive over the five-day period.

 

The RDS found that 10,357 people, of the 96,087 it tested between August 4th and 8th, had contracted COVID-19.

(Underscore in quote added by me.)

 

Granted, while 96,087 technically does qualify as "at least 50,000,"  why the discrepancy in figures?

Posted
13 minutes ago, wpcoe said:

(Underscore in quote added by me.)

 

Granted, while 96,087 technically does qualify as "at least 50,000,"  why the discrepancy in figures?

Thai reporting, so no more! ????

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...